Village of Elm Grove v. Richard K. Brefka
Appeal Number 2011AP002888
Supreme Court
CASE HISTORY
|
Status
|
Court
|
Filing Date
|
Anticipated Due Date
|
Activity
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-30-2013
|
Remittitur
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-22-2013
|
Cites
|
|
|
350 Wis. 2d 724
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-22-2013
|
Cites
|
|
|
838 N.W.2d 87
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-22-2013
|
Court Order
|
|
|
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that footnote 3 is editorially revised to add the following paragraph to the beginning of the footnote: "Finally, we note that Attorney Andrew Mishlove first made an appearance in this case subsequent to the time that the ten-day time limit for demanding a refusal hearing had expired. It appears that Mr. Brefka, or his predecessor counsel, missed the time prior to the date of Attorney Mishlove's appearance." The second paragraph of footnote 3 will then begin, "Further, we note that Tthe municipal court . . . ."
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-22-2013
|
Public Domain Citation
|
|
|
Comment: PDC No: 2013 WI 86
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-16-2013
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Andrew Mishlove
Submit Date: 7-16-2013 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 10-22-2013 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that footnote 3 is editorially revised to add the following paragraph to the beginning of the footnote: "Finally, we note that Attorney Andrew Mishlove first made an appearance in this case subsequent to the time that the ten-day time limit for demanding a refusal hearing had expired. It appears that Mr. Brefka, or his predecessor counsel, missed the time prior to the date of Attorney Mishlove's appearance." The second paragraph of footnote 3 will then begin, "Further, we note that Tthe municipal court . . . ." Comment: Motion to revise the written decision |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
06-26-2013
|
Cites
|
|
|
348 Wis. 2d 282
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
06-26-2013
|
Cites
|
|
|
832 N.W.2d 121
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
06-26-2013
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Abrahamson, Bradley, Crooks, Prosser, Roggensack, Ziegler, Gableman
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Affirmed Pages: 23 Written by: Bradley, Ann Walsh Order Text: The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
06-25-2013
|
Public Domain Citation
|
|
|
Comment: PDC No: 2013 WI 54
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-13-2013
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
Comment: Additional Authorities
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-13-2013
|
Oral Argument
|
|
|
Comment: 2nd case, 9:45 a.m; Atty Andrew Mishlove for Def-App-Pet ; Atty Douglas Hoffer for Pla-Res
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-07-2013
|
Additional Authorities
|
|
|
Comment: filed by DEF-APP-PET, Richard K. Brefka; forwarded to marshall's office for delivery to the court Additional Authorities
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
02-06-2013
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-17-2013
|
Assigned-Oral Argument
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-14-2013
|
Attorney Change
|
|
|
Comment: Added L. Stuckert, Counsel for Def-App-Pet
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-14-2013
|
Reply Brief-Supreme Court
Reply Brief-Supreme Court |
|
|
Filed By: Andrew Mishlove
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-08-2013
|
Response
|
|
|
Comment: **10 EXTRA COPIES OF CA BRIEFS FOR SC **
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-03-2013
|
Response Brief-Supreme Court
Response Brief-Supreme Court |
|
|
Filed By: Douglas Hoffer
Comment: Appx to Response Brief-Supreme Court |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-14-2012
|
First Brief-Supreme Court
First Brief-Supreme Court |
|
|
Filed By: Andrew Mishlove
Comment: Appx to First Brief-Supreme Court |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-14-2012
|
Caption Amended
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-14-2012
|
Court Changed to Supreme Court
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-26-2012
|
Cites
|
|
|
343 Wis. 2d 680
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-26-2012
|
Cites
|
|
|
819 N.W.2d 563
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-26-2012
|
Opinion Ordered Unpublished
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-20-2012
|
Fee Paid
|
|
|
Comment: Receipt No: 12R 001694
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-19-2012
|
Petition for Review
|
|
|
Filed By: Andrew Mishlove
Submit Date: 7-30-2012 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 11-14-2012 IT IS ORDERED the petition for review is granted. Briefs/statements 3020/10. Motion Response Filed By: Douglas Hoffer Submit Date: 7-30-2012 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-19-2012
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Brennan
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Affirmed Pages: 8 Order Text: Order affirmed |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-08-2012
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-18-2012
|
Submitted on Briefs
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-16-2012
|
Record and Briefs Sent to District 1
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-15-2012
|
No Brief to Be Filed
|
|
|
Comment: No reply brief to be filed because the respondent's rely solely on unpublished decision in their brief. No Brief to Be Filed
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-02-2012
|
Brief of Respondent(s)
Brief of Respondent(s) |
|
|
Filed By: Douglas Hoffer
Comment: 11/26/12 - rcvd 10 copies of CA brief for SC use. Appx to Brief of Respondent(s) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-10-2012
|
Brief & Appx of Appellant(s)
Brief of Appellant |
|
|
Filed By: Andrew Mishlove
Comment: Please note a Statement on Oral Argument and Publication was added to all briefs. RECD 10 addl copie sof CA BAP and BNO for SC use 11/28/12 Appx of Appellant(s) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-01-2012
|
Record
|
|
|
Comment: 1-2 to 12-1
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-10-2012
|
Court Reporter's Statement-Trans.
|
|
|
Court Reporter Name: (Zeniecki, Bonita)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-09-2012
|
Transcript filed in Circuit Court
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-22-2011
|
Statement on Transcript
|
|
|
Filed By: Andrew Mishlove
Status: Ordered |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-15-2011
|
Transfer to District I
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-15-2011
|
Notif. Sent-Filing of NAP & Ct. Record
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-15-2011
|
Fee Paid
|
|
|
Comment: Receipt No: 11R 003102
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-15-2011
|
Notice of Appeal & Circuit Court Docket Entries
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-15-2011
|
Docketing Statement from Appellant
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-14-2011
|
Notice of Appeal filed in Cir. Ct.
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-01-2011
|
Order of Circuit Court
|
|