State v. William Dinkins, Sr.

Appeal Number 2009AP001643 - CR

Supreme Court

CASE HISTORY
Status
Court
Filing Date
Anticipated Due Date
Activity
OCCD
SC
04-13-2012
Remittitur

OCCD
SC
03-13-2012
Cites
810 N.W.2d 787

OCCD
SC
03-13-2012
Cites
339 Wis. 2d 78

OCCD
SC
03-13-2012
Judge Panel: Abrahamson, Bradley, Crooks, Prosser, Roggensack, Ziegler, Gableman
Opinion: Opinion
Decision: Affirmed Pages: 24
Written by: Bradley, Ann Walsh
Ziegler, Annette K. Wrote Dissenting Opinion 16 pages.
Gableman, Michael J. Joined Dissenting Opinion
Roggensack, Patience Drake Wrote Concurring Opinion 10 pages.
Order Text: The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

OCCD
SC
03-12-2012
Public Domain Citation
Comment: PDC No: 2012 WI 24

OCCD
SC
01-12-2012
Attorney Change
Comment: AAG Weber for AAG Freimuth due to Freimuth's retirement

OCCD
SC
10-10-2011
Briefs Received At State Law Library
Comment: Additional Authorities

OCCD
SC
09-08-2011
Letter/Correspondence
Comment: Atty. Freimuth answer to Justice Gableman question during oral argument in S.Ct. on September 6; submitted to S.Ct.

OCCD
SC
09-06-2011
Oral Argument
Comment: 1st case at 9:45 a.m. James M. Freimuth atty for Pla-Resp-Pet; Steven D. Phillips atty for the Def-App

OCCD
SC
08-31-2011
Additional Authorities
Comment: Second Supplemental Authority filed by AAG Freimuth on behalf of plaintiff-respondent-petitioner, State of Wisconsin; submitted to S.Ct. Additional Authorities 8.31.2011

OCCD
SC
08-29-2011
Additional Authorities
Comment: Filed by AAG Freimuth on behalf of plaintiff-respondent-petitioner, State of Wisconsin.; submitted to S.Ct. Additional Authorities 8.29.2011

OCCD
SC
07-15-2011
Briefs Received At State Law Library

OCCD
SC
06-29-2011
Assigned-Oral Argument

OCCD
SC
05-09-2011
Reply Brief-Supreme Court
Reply Brief-Supreme Court
Filed By: James Freimuth

OCCD
SC
04-29-2011
Response Brief-Supreme Court
Response Brief-Supreme Court
Filed By: Steven Phillips
Comment: Appx to Response Brief-Supreme Court

OCCD
SC
04-29-2011
Response
Comment: add'l 10 copies of briefs previously filed by each party in ct. app.

OCCD
SC
04-12-2011
First Brief-Supreme Court
First Brief-Supreme Court
Filed By: James Freimuth
Comment: Appx to First Brief-Supreme Court

OCCD
SC
03-18-2011
Caption Amended

OCCD
SC
03-16-2011
Court Changed to Supreme Court

OCCD
CA
01-20-2011
Final Publication

OCCD
CA
12-14-2010
Cites
330 Wis. 2d 591

OCCD
CA
12-14-2010
Cites
794 N.W.2d 236

OCCD
CA
12-14-2010
Opinion Ordered Published

OCCD
CA
12-14-2010
Public Domain Citation
Comment: PDC No: 2010 WI App 163

OCCD
SC
12-09-2010
Fee Waived

OCCD
SC
12-09-2010
Petition for Review
Filed By: James Freimuth
Submit Date: 12-21-2010
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 3-16-2011
ORD that the petition for review is granted and that pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.62(6), the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner may not raise or argue issues not set forth in the petition for review unless otherwise ordered by the court; and
FRO that pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rules 809.62(6) and 809.63, within 30 days after the date of this order the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner must file a brief in this court; that within 20 days of filing the defendant-appellant, William Dinkins, Sr., must file either a brief or a statement that no brief will be filed; and that if a brief is filed by the defendant-appellant, within 10 days of filing the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner must file either a reply brief or a statement that no reply brief will be filed; and
FRO that in any brief filed in this court the parties shall not incorporate by reference any portion of their court of appeals' brief or petition for review or response; instead, any material in these documents upon which there is reliance should be restated in the brief filed in this court; and
FRO that the first brief filed in this court must contain, as part of the appendix, a copy of the decision of the court of appeals in this case; and
FRO that within 30 days after the date of this order, each party must provide the clerk of this court with 10 copies of the brief previously filed on behalf of that party in the court of appeals; and
FRO that the allowance of costs, if any, in connection with the granting of the petition will abide the decision of this court on review.
Motion Response
Filed By: Steven Phillips
Submit Date: 12-21-2010

OCCD
CA
11-18-2010
Judge Panel: Lundsten, Higginbotham, Vergeront
Opinion: Opinion
Decision: Reversed Pages: 17
Written by: Higginbotham, Paul B.
Order Text: Judgment and order reversed.

OCCD
CA
04-20-2010
Oral Argument

OCCD
CA
04-16-2010
Additional Authorities

OCCD
CA
02-11-2010
Assigned-Oral Argument

OCCD
CA
11-24-2009
Briefs Received At State Law Library

OCCD
CA
11-11-2009
Record and Briefs Sent to District 4

OCCD
CA
11-10-2009
Reply Brief
Reply Brief
Filed By: Steven Phillips

OCCD
CA
10-29-2009
Brief of Respondent(s)
Brief of Respondent
Filed By: James Freimuth

OCCD
CA
09-30-2009
Motion to Extend Time
Filed By: James Freimuth
Submit Date: 9-30-2009
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 10-1-2009
ORD that the time for the State to file its brief is extended to October 29, 2009.
See BRS event due on 10-29-2009

OCCD
CA
09-22-2009
Attorney Change

OCCD
CA
09-08-2009
Brief & Appx of Appellant(s)
Brief of Appellant
Filed By: Steven Phillips

OCCD
CA
08-03-2009
Record

OCCD
CA
07-28-2009
Court Reporter's Statement-Trans.
Court Reporter Name: (Wild, Tammy)

OCCD
CA
07-24-2009
Delinquent

OCCD
CA
07-02-2009
Transcript filed in Circuit Court

OCCD
CA
06-30-2009
Notif. Sent-Filing of NAP & Ct. Record

OCCD
CA
06-30-2009
Fee Waived

OCCD
CA
06-30-2009
Notice of Appeal & Circuit Court Docket Entries

OCCD
CA
06-24-2009
Statement on Transcript
Filed By: Steven Phillips
Status: Ordered

OCCD
CA
06-18-2009
Notice of Appeal filed in Cir. Ct.

OCCD
CA
06-17-2009
Received SPD Appointment Order

OCCD
CA
06-15-2009
Order of Circuit Court

OCCD
CA
11-24-2008
Judgment of Circuit Court