Timothy W. Miller v. Angela L. Carroll
Appeal Number 2017AP002132
Supreme Court
CASE HISTORY
|
Status
|
Court
|
Filing Date
|
Anticipated Due Date
|
Activity
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-26-2020
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: From U.S. Supreme Court: petition for writ of certiorari denied 10/13/20.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-22-2020
|
Remittitur
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
06-16-2020
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Roggensack, Bradley, Ziegler, Bradley, Kelly, Dallet, Hagedorn
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Affirmed Pages: 23 Written by: Dallet, Rebecca F. Bradley, Ann Walsh Wrote Concurring Opinion 11 pages. Ziegler, Annette K. Wrote Concurring Opinion 23 pages. Dallet, Rebecca F. Wrote Concurring Opinion 3 pages. Hagedorn, Brian K. Joined Concurring Opinion Hagedorn, Brian K. Wrote Dissenting Opinion 14 pages. Bradley, Rebecca Grassl Joined Dissenting Opinion Kelly, Daniel Joined Dissenting Opinion Order Text: The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed. Comment: Opinion/Decision |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
06-15-2020
|
Public Domain Citation
|
|
|
Comment: PDC No: 2020 WI 56
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-16-2020
|
Cites
|
|
|
392 Wis. 2d 49
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-16-2020
|
Cites
|
|
|
944 N.W.2d 542
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-13-2020
|
Oral Argument
|
|
|
Comment: 1st case, 9:45 a.m. Attorney Brandon M. Schwartz for Joint-Petitioner-Respondent-Petitioner, Attorney Terry Moore for Joint-Petitioner-Appellant.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-27-2019
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: filed by Atty Terry L. Moore re: co-counsel for Timothy W. Miller
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-06-2019
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
Comment: Amicus Curiae WCAAML
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-29-2019
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Two electronic versions of the Brief of Amicus Curiae were uploaded for an unknown reason. The version which was uploaded last has been accepted for filing and the initially loaded version is hereby rejected to avoid duplicity in the electronic document queue for this case. No further action is required in response to this email.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-29-2019
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae
Brief of Amicus Curiae - Wisconsin Chapter of American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers |
|
|
Filed By: Jennifer Van Kirk
Comment: Wisconsin Chapter of American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-22-2019
|
MXT Pages In Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Daniel Bestul
Submit Date: 11-25-2019 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 11-29-2019 ORD that the motion is granted. The Wisconsin Chapter of AAML's 4,157-word non-party brief is accepted as filed. Comment: Motion Requesting a Word Extension and, in the Alternative, a Motion for Extension to File an Amicus Brief (re: brief of Wisconsin Chapter of American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-14-2019
|
Assigned-Oral Argument
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-11-2019
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: From Clerk's Office: per counsel's request, this case has been removed from the court's December oral argument calendar and will be rescheduled to a date/time TBD.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-30-2019
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-25-2019
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Daniel Bestul
Submit Date: 10-28-2019 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 10-29-2019 ORD that the motion is granted. Twenty-two copies of the brief shall be filed on or before 11/12/19. Comment: re: Wisconsin Chapter of American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-11-2019
|
Certificate of Filing by Mail
|
|
|
Comment: RE: Reply Brief - Supreme Court, (IB), Shipped 10-10-19, COS
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-11-2019
|
Reply Brief-Supreme Court
Reply Brief-Supreme Court |
|
|
Filed By: Brandon Schwartz
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-02-2019
|
Certificate of Filing by Mail
|
|
|
Comment: Re: SC Response Breifs; Rcvd 22 copies of briefs and two-part separate appendices,
shipped, (IB)10-01-2019. COS
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-02-2019
|
Response Brief-Supreme Court
|
|
|
Filed By: Stephanie Finn
Comment: Two Separate Appendices. When using staples, please make sure there are no protruding or sharp staples. Appx Part 1 to Response Brief-Supreme Court Appx Part 2 to Response Brief-Supreme Court |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-13-2019
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The electronic version of the Appendix to the First Brief - Supreme Court is rejected for lack of an electronic appendix certification; see Rule 809.19(13)(f). You are not required to file an appendix electronically and therefore, do not need to take any further action in response to this email.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-12-2019
|
Certificate of Filing by Mail
|
|
|
Comment: Re: First Brief Supreme Court, (IB) shipped 9/11/19. COS.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-12-2019
|
First Brief-Supreme Court
First Brief-Supreme Court |
|
|
Filed By: Brandon Schwartz
Comment: Separate Appendix. Note that the cover color has been corrected on all separate appendices. Please see Rule 809.19(9) regarding requirements. Appx Part 1 to First Brief-Supreme Court Appx Part 2 to First Brief-Supreme Court |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-14-2019
|
Caption Amended
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-14-2019
|
Court Changed to Supreme Court
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-05-2019
|
Final Publication
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-27-2019
|
Cites
|
|
|
386 Wis. 2d 267
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-27-2019
|
Cites
|
|
|
925 N.W.2d 580
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-27-2019
|
Opinion Ordered Published
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-27-2019
|
Public Domain Citation
|
|
|
Comment: PDC No: 2019 WI App 10
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-18-2019
|
Fee Paid
|
|
|
Comment: Invoice No: 19002; Receipt No: 19R 000714
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-18-2019
|
Invoice Issued
|
|
|
Comment: Invoice No: 19002
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-13-2019
|
Court Order
|
|
|
ORD that unless within ten (10) days of the date of this order, the filing fee is received by the clerk of the supreme court, the action will be subject to dismissal under Rule 809.83.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-13-2019
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The electronic version of the Appendix to the Petition for Review is rejected for lack of an electronic appendix certification; see Rule 809.19(13)(f). You are not required to file an appendix electronically and therefore, do not need to take any further action in response to this email.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-13-2019
|
Petition for Review
|
|
|
Filed By: Brandon Schwartz
Submit Date: 3-27-2019 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 8-14-2019 ORD petition for review is granted. Briefs due 30/20/10. Motion Response Filed By: Stephanie Finn Submit Date: 3-27-2019 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-20-2019
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Stark, Hruz, Seidl
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Reversed and remanded Pages: 15 Written by: Seidl, Mark A. Order Text: Orders reversed and cause remanded with directions |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-05-2018
|
Submitted on Briefs
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-04-2018
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-19-2018
|
Record and Briefs Sent to District 3
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-16-2018
|
Certificate of Filing by Mail
|
|
|
Comment: RE: Reply Brief (IB), shipped 4-13-18. COS Included
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-16-2018
|
Reply Brief
Reply Brief |
|
|
Filed By: Stephanie Finn
Comment: Note that the caption has been corrected on this brief. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-02-2018
|
Certificate of Service
|
|
|
Comment: BRS - 3-29-2018, IB
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-02-2018
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The electronic copy of the Appendix to the Respondent's brief is rejected because it does not contain the electronic appendix certification pursuant to Rule 809.19(13)(f).
You are not required to file an electronic copy of the appendix, but if you opt to do so you must fax a copy of the electronic appendix certification to the clerk's office for insertion in the hard copies, and upload a corrected electronic version of the appendix that includes the requisite certification.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-02-2018
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The electronic version of the Respondent's brief lists an incorrect case caption on the brief cover. Corrections to the caption have been made by clerk's office staff on the hardcopies of the brief. Please upload a corrected electronic version of the brief and notify clerk's office staff by calling 608-266-1880 when done so that it may be accepted for filing. Failure to notify may result in delayed acceptance of the corrected e-document.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-02-2018
|
Brief of Respondent(s)
Brief of Respondent |
|
|
Filed By: Brandon Schwartz
Comment: 2 separate appendix; Note that the caption has been corrected on this brief. Please use the above caption on all future briefs. Appx to Brief of Respondent(s) PT 1 Appx to Brief of Respondent(s) PT 2 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-28-2018
|
Certificate of Filing by Mail
|
|
|
Comment: BAP-IB 02/27/18
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-28-2018
|
Brief & Appx of Appellant(s)
Brief of Appellant |
|
|
Filed By: Stephanie Finn
Comment: Separate Appendix Appx to Brief of Appellant(s) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-18-2018
|
Supplement to Record
|
|
|
Comment: ELECTRONICALLY FILED: 131-1 to 134-63
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-10-2018
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The electronic copy of "ANGELA CARROLL'S MEMORANDUM IN RESPONSE TO THE COURTS DECEMBER 22, 2017 ORDER AND THE MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD" is rejected because there is no statutory provision for the acceptance of e-filed memorandums/responses to motions. The Rules of Appellate Procedure (Wis. Stat. ch. 809) require attorneys to electronically file a copy of all appellate briefs, no-merit reports, petitions for review, and responses thereto.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-08-2018
|
Motion to Correct/Supplement Record
|
|
|
Filed By: Stephanie Finn
Submit Date: 1-10-2018 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-12-2018 ORD that this court has jurisdiction over the appeal. FRO that the motion to supplement the record with the aforementioned documents is granted. The circuit court clerk shall immediately transmit the documents by supplemental return. FRO that the appellant's brief is due 40 days from the date of the supplemental return. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-29-2017
|
Court Reporter's Statement-Trans.
|
|
|
Court Reporter Name: (Lundmark, Staci)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-22-2017
|
Jurisdiction Check
|
|
|
Filed By: Unassigned District 3
Submit Date: 1-10-2018 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 1-12-2018 ORD that this court has jurisdiction over the appeal. FRO that the motion to supplement the record with the aforementioned documents is granted. The circuit court clerk shall immediately transmit the documents by supplemental return. FRO that the appellant's brief is due 40 days from the date of the supplemental return. Motion Response Filed By: Stephanie Finn Submit Date: 1-10-2018 Motion Response Filed By: Brandon Schwartz Submit Date: 1-10-2018 Comment: +7 for respondent's memo; Atty Schwartz's memo/response to MCR is not signed, spoke w/ofc staff 1/10/18, plz fax at least one signed copy...to be submitted for review upon receipt of signed version |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-19-2017
|
Record
|
|
|
Comment: ELECTRONICALLY FILED: 1-8 to 130-63
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-14-2017
|
Delinquent
|
|
|
Comment: New due date of connected CRS: 12-21-2017
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-01-2017
|
Transcript filed in Circuit Court
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-06-2017
|
Statement on Transcript
|
|
|
Filed By: Stephanie Finn
Status: Ordered |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-02-2017
|
Fee Paid
|
|
|
Comment: Invoice No: 18494; Receipt No: 17R 002663
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-02-2017
|
Invoice Issued
|
|
|
Comment: Invoice No: 18494
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-30-2017
|
Notif. Sent-Filing of NAP & Ct. Record
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-30-2017
|
Docketing Statement Submitted
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-30-2017
|
Court Order for Filing Fee Issued
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-30-2017
|
Notice of Appeal & Court Record
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-27-2017
|
Docketing Statement from Appellant
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-26-2017
|
Notice of Appeal filed in Cir. Ct.
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-10-2017
|
Order of Circuit Court
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-01-2017
|
Order of Circuit Court
|
|