Albert D. Moustakis v. State of Wisconsin Department of Justice
Appeal Number 2014AP001853
Supreme Court
CASE HISTORY
|
Status
|
Court
|
Filing Date
|
Anticipated Due Date
|
Activity
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
06-22-2016
|
Remittitur
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
05-20-2016
|
Cites
|
|
|
880 N.W.2d 142
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
05-20-2016
|
Cites
|
|
|
368 Wis. 2d 677
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
05-20-2016
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Roggensack, Abrahamson, Bradley, Prosser, Ziegler, Gableman, Bradley
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Affirmed Pages: 32 Written by: Abrahamson, Shirley S. Ziegler, Annette K. Joined Concur/Dissent Opinion Gableman, Michael J. Joined Concur/Dissent Opinion Roggensack, Patience Drake Wrote Concur/Dissent Opinion 7 pages. Order Text: The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed, and the cause is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
05-18-2016
|
Public Domain Citation
|
|
|
Comment: PDC No: 2016 WI 42
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
02-04-2016
|
Oral Argument
|
|
|
Comment: 1st case, 9:45 a.m. (rescheduled from 2nd case). Atty Scott A. Swid for Pla-App-Pet. Atty Brian Keenan for Def-Res
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-19-2016
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: To counsel notifying of oral argument schedule change from 2nd case to 1st case on Feb. 4th. cjp
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-14-2016
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-11-2016
|
Certificate of Filing by Mail
|
|
|
Comment: BR3
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-08-2016
|
Reply Brief-Supreme Court
Reply Brief-Supreme Court |
|
|
Filed By: Benjamin Krautkramer
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-07-2016
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-28-2015
|
Response Brief-Supreme Court
Response Brief-Supreme Court |
|
|
Filed By: Brian Keenan
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-22-2015
|
Assigned-Oral Argument
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-10-2015
|
Response
|
|
|
Comment: 10 addl copies of CA briefs for SC
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-07-2015
|
Certificate of Filing by Mail
|
|
|
Comment: BR1
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-04-2015
|
First Brief-Supreme Court
First Brief-Supreme Court |
|
|
Filed By: Benjamin Krautkramer
Comment: Separate appendix: Please note that the title of this brief has been corrected, Please note the party designation on the caption was corrected on the covers of all briefs. Please use the above caption on all future briefs. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-05-2015
|
Caption Amended
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-05-2015
|
Court Changed to Supreme Court
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-16-2015
|
Final Publication
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-31-2015
|
Fee Paid
|
|
|
Comment: Receipt No: 15R 002133
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-31-2015
|
Petition for Review
|
|
|
Filed By: Scott Swid
Submit Date: 9-4-2015 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 11-5-2015 IT IS ORDERED that the petition for review is granted and that pursuant to Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.62(6), the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner may not raise or argue issues not set forth in the petition for review unless otherwise ordered by the court; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Wis. Stat. (Rules) 809.62(6) and 809.63, within 30 days after the date of this order the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner must file a brief in this court; that within 20 days of filing the defendant-respondent, State of Wisconsin Department of Justice, must file either a brief or a statement that no brief will be filed; and that if a brief is filed by the defendant-respondent, within 10 days of filing the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner must file either a reply brief or a statement that no reply brief will be filed; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in any brief filed in this court the parties shall not incorporate by reference any portion of their court of appeals' brief or petition for review; instead, any material in these documents upon which there is reliance should be restated in the brief filed in this court; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the first brief filed in this court must contain, as part of the appendix, a copy of the decision of the court of appeals in this case; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this order, each party must provide the clerk of this court with 10 copies of the brief previously filed on behalf of that party in the court of appeals; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the allowance of costs, if any, in connection with the granting of the petition will abide the decision of this court on review. Motion Response Filed By: Brian Keenan Submit Date: 9-4-2015 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-26-2015
|
Opinion Ordered Published
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-26-2015
|
Cites
|
|
|
364 Wis. 2d 740
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-26-2015
|
Cites
|
|
|
869 N.W.2d 788
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-26-2015
|
Public Domain Citation
|
|
|
Comment: PDC No: 2015 WI App 63
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-31-2015
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Hoover, Stark, Hruz
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Affirmed and remanded Pages: 13 Written by: Hruz, Thomas M. Order Text: Order affirmed and cause remanded for further proceedings. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-24-2015
|
Submitted on Briefs
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-19-2015
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-30-2014
|
Record and Briefs Sent to District 3
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-23-2014
|
Certificate of Filing by Mail
|
|
|
Comment: BRY (IB)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-22-2014
|
Reply Brief
Reply Brief |
|
|
Filed By: Benjamin Krautkramer
Comment: received 10 copies of BRY for SC use. PS 12-7-2015 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-10-2014
|
Brief of Respondent(s)
Brief of Respondent |
|
|
Filed By: Brian Keenan
Comment: received 10 additional copies of BRS for SC use. EW 12/10/15 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-04-2014
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Henry Schultz
Submit Date: 12-4-2014 Decision: (M) Dismiss Decision Date: 12-5-2014 ORD that the motion is dismissed. Comment: MXT to file Intervenor's brief |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-11-2014
|
Certificate of Filing by Mail
|
|
|
Comment: BAP (IB)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-10-2014
|
Brief & Appx of Appellant(s)
Brief of Appellant |
|
|
Filed By: Benjamin Krautkramer
Comment: Note that the caption has been corrected on this brief. Please use the above caption on all future briefs.: received 10 copies of BAP for SC use. PS 12-7-2015 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-17-2014
|
Record
|
|
|
Comment: 1-5 to 65-1
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-03-2014
|
Motion to Dismiss
|
|
|
Filed By: Brian Keenan
Submit Date: 9-19-2014 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 10-2-2014 ORD that the motion to dismiss is denied. FRO that, if the order from which this appeal is taken is not appealable as a matter of right, we grant leave to appeal the non-final order. Motion Response Filed By: Benjamin Krautkramer Submit Date: 9-24-2014 Comment: Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Treat the Notice of Appeal as a Petition for Leave to Appeal |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-22-2014
|
Statement on Transcript
|
|
|
Filed By: Scott Swid
Status: Prev. Filed Comment: 8/22/14 CRS filed by S. Beever |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-13-2014
|
Attorney Change
|
|
|
Comment: W/drew AAG Burke, added AAG Keenan as counsel for DOJ per filing of "Notice of Appearance and Substitution of Counsel".
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-11-2014
|
Notif. Sent-Filing of NAP & Ct. Record
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-11-2014
|
Docketing Statement Submitted
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-11-2014
|
Fee Paid
|
|
|
Comment: Receipt No: 14R 002149
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-11-2014
|
Notice of Appeal & Circuit Court Docket Entries
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-11-2014
|
Docketing Statement from Appellant
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-08-2014
|
Notice of Appeal filed in Cir. Ct.
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-21-2014
|
Order of Circuit Court
|
|