Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Scott Walker
Appeal Number 2012AP002067
Supreme Court
CASE HISTORY
|
Status
|
Court
|
Filing Date
|
Anticipated Due Date
|
Activity
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-06-2015
|
Remittitur
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-20-2014
|
Motion for Reconsideration
|
|
|
Filed By: M. Padway
Submit Date: 9-3-2014 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 11-5-2014 ORD that the motion is denied, with $50 costs. Motion Response Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick Submit Date: 9-4-2014 Motion Response Filed By: M. Padway Submit Date: 9-12-2014 Motion Response Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick Submit Date: 9-18-2014 Motion Response Filed By: M. Padway Submit Date: 10-1-2014 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-31-2014
|
Published Opinion Citation
|
|
|
358 Wis. 2d 1
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-31-2014
|
Published Opinion Citation
|
|
|
851 N.W.2d 337
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-31-2014
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Abrahamson, Bradley, Crooks, Prosser, Roggensack, Ziegler, Gableman
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Reversed Pages: 90 Written by: Gableman, Michael J. Abrahamson, Shirley S. Joined Dissenting Opinion Crooks, N. Patrick Wrote Concurring Opinion 8 pages. Bradley, Ann Walsh Wrote Dissenting Opinion 28 pages. Order Text: The decision and order of the circuit court is reversed. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-30-2014
|
Public Domain Citation
|
|
|
Comment: PDC No: 2014 WI 99
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
04-30-2014
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
Comment: Additional Authorities
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
04-23-2014
|
Additional Authorities
|
|
|
Comment: filed by AAG Kilpatrick on behalf of defendants-appellants ("the State"); submitted to S.Ct. Additional Authorities-filed by AAG Kilpatrick on behalf of defendants-appellants ("the State")
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-22-2014
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
Comment: Rsp. to Add'l/Supplemental Authorities
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-14-2014
|
Response to Additional/Supplemental Authorities
|
|
|
Comment: filed by AAG Kilpatrick on behalf of Defendants-Appellants; submitted to S.Ct. Rsp. to Add'l/Supplemental Authorities-filed by AAG Kilpatrick on behalf of Defandants-Appellants
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-13-2014
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
Comment: Additional Authorities
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-07-2014
|
Additional Authorities
|
|
|
Comment: filed by Atty. Padway on behalf of plaintiff-respondent Public Employees Union Local 61; submitted to S.Ct. Additional Authorities-Filed by Atty. Padway on behalf of plaintiff-respondent Public Employees Union Local 61
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-22-2013
|
Public Domain Citation
|
|
|
Comment: PDC No: 2013 WI 91
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-21-2013
|
Published Opinion Citation
|
|
|
351 Wis. 2d 237
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-21-2013
|
Published Opinion Citation
|
|
|
839 N.W.2d 388
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-21-2013
|
Order
|
|
|
Per Curiam. By the Court. -The contempt order of the circuit court is vacated.
Dissent: Abrahamson, CJ and Bradley, J. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-11-2013
|
Oral Argument
|
|
|
Comment: at 9:45 a.m., 2nd case (rescheduled from 1:30 p.m.): AG J.B. Van Hollen and AAG Kevin St. John for Def-App; Atty Tamara Packard, M. Nicol Padway, Lester A. Pines for Pla-Res
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-08-2013
|
Order
|
|
|
IT IS ORDERED that the non-party union movants' motion to intervene is denied because it is untimely. "The general rule [is] that postjudgment motions for intervention will be granted only upon a strong showing of justification for failure to request intervention sooner and that a postjudgment motion to intervene by its nature prolongs litigation beyond the point anticipated by the original parties." Olivarez v. Unitrin, 2005 WI App 189, 20, 296 Wis. 2d 337, 723 N.W.2d 131. The movants have not asserted that they attempted to intervene in the circuit court or in the court of appeals, nor have they proffered any reason why they could not have done so. Intervention at this late stage will cause delay in the case that has been waiting for our review since June 14, 2013.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of non-party union movants and the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to participate in oral argument are denied. In addition, we also deny the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to intervene. We are confident that the pending motions and contentions regarding the constitutionality of Act 10 and Act 32 will be well addressed by the parties at oral argument and the written filings of all. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendants-Appellants will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address. This time can be divided between argument-in-chief and rebuttal if the Defendants-Appellants so choose. The Plaintiffs-Respondents will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address. Dissent: Abrahamson, CJ, Bradley, J. and Crooks, J. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-08-2013
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Daniel Borowski
Submit Date: 11-8-2013 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 11-8-2013 ORD that the non-party union movants' motion to intervene is denied because it is untimely. The movants have not asserted that they attempted to intervene in the circuit court or in the court of appeals, nor have they proffered any reason why they could not have done so. Intervention at this late stage will cause delay in the case that has been waiting for our review since June 14, 2013. FRO that the motion of non-party union movants and the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to participate in oral argument are denied. In addition, we also deny the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to intervene. We are confident that the pending motions and contentions regarding the constituionality of Act 10 and Act 32 will be well addressed by the parties at oral argument and the written filings of all. FRO that the Defendants-Appellants will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address. This time can be divided between argument-in-chief and rebuttal if the Defendants-Appellants so choose. The Plaintiffs-Respondents will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address. Shirley S. Abrahamson, C.J., Ann Walsh Bradley, J., and N. Patrick Crooks, J. (dissenting). Comment: Motion for Leave to Appear and Present Oral Argument |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-07-2013
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 11-7-2013 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 11-8-2013 ORD that the non-party union movants' motion to intervene is denied because it is untimely. The movants have not asserted that they attempted to intervene in the circuit court or in the court of appeals, nor have they proffered any reason why they could not have done so. Intervention at this late stage will cause delay in the case that has been waiting for our review since June 14, 2013. FRO that the motion of non-party union movants and the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to participate in oral argument are denied. In addition, we also deny the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to intervene. We are confident that the pending motions and contentions regarding the constituionality of Act 10 and Act 32 will be well addressed by the parties at oral argument and the written filings of all. FRO that the Defendants-Appellants will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address. This time can be divided between argument-in-chief and rebuttal if the Defendants-Appellants so choose. The Plaintiffs-Respondents will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address. Shirley S. Abrahamson, C.J., Ann Walsh Bradley, J., and N. Patrick Crooks, J. (dissenting). Motion Response Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick Submit Date: 11-7-2013 Motion Response Filed By: Lester Pines Submit Date: 11-7-2013 Comment: Affidavit of Steven C. Kilpatrick with attached Exhibit C |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-07-2013
|
Motion for Clarification
|
|
|
Filed By: Timothy Hawks
Submit Date: 11-7-2013 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 11-8-2013 ORD that the non-party union movants' motion to intervene is denied because it is untimely. The movants have not asserted that they attempted to intervene in the circuit court or in the court of appeals, nor have they proffered any reason why they could not have done so. Intervention at this late stage will cause delay in the case that has been waiting for our review since June 14, 2013. FRO that the motion of non-party union movants and the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to participate in oral argument are denied. In addition, we also deny the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to intervene. We are confident that the pending motions and contentions regarding the constituionality of Act 10 and Act 32 will be well addressed by the parties at oral argument and the written filings of all. FRO that the Defendants-Appellants will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address. This time can be divided between argument-in-chief and rebuttal if the Defendants-Appellants so choose. The Plaintiffs-Respondents will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address. Shirley S. Abrahamson, C.J., Ann Walsh Bradley, J., and N. Patrick Crooks, J. (dissenting). Motion Response Filed By: Timothy Hawks Submit Date: 11-7-2013 Motion Response Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick Submit Date: 11-8-2013 Motion Response Filed By: Timothy Hawks Submit Date: 11-8-2013 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-06-2013
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: M. Padway
Submit Date: 11-6-2013 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 11-8-2013 ORD that the non-party union movants' motion to intervene is denied because it is untimely. The movants have not asserted that they attempted to intervene in the circuit court or in the court of appeals, nor have they proffered any reason why they could not have done so. Intervention at this late stage will cause delay in the case that has been waiting for our review since June 14, 2013. FRO that the motion of non-party union movants and the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to participate in oral argument are denied. In addition, we also deny the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to intervene. We are confident that the pending motions and contentions regarding the constituionality of Act 10 and Act 32 will be well addressed by the parties at oral argument and the written filings of all. FRO that the Defendants-Appellants will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address. This time can be divided between argument-in-chief and rebuttal if the Defendants-Appellants so choose. The Plaintiffs-Respondents will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address. Shirley S. Abrahamson, C.J., Ann Walsh Bradley, J., and N. Patrick Crooks, J. (dissenting). Motion Response Filed By: Lester Pines Submit Date: 11-7-2013 Motion Response Filed By: M. Padway Submit Date: 11-7-2013 Comment: Motion for Additional Time for Oral Argument Motion for Miscellaneous Relief |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-05-2013
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: DOJ's ltr requesting relief from the 11-4-13 CA order.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-05-2013
|
Additional Authorities
|
|
|
Comment: AG Kilpatrick filed - 12AP2490
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-04-2013
|
Attorney Change
|
|
|
Comment: Delete Kurt C. Kobelt; add Stephen Pieroni for Wisconsin Education Association Council
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-29-2013
|
Additional Authorities
|
|
|
Comment: filed by Atty. Esenberg; submitted to S.Ct.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-29-2013
|
Order
|
|
|
The court of appeals ordinarily considers motions to stay circuit court orders in the first instance, and this court normally does not address such matters until after the court of appeals has ruled. In the interest of judicial economy, we deem it appropriate to follow that established practice in this case. Accordingly, this court will take no action on the defendants-appellants motion to stay until after the court of appeals has issued its decision. If any party seeks relief from the court of appeals decision in this matter, such request for relief shall be filed on the day following the court of appeals decision. If such a request for relief is filed and any party wishes to supplement the filings made in the court of appeals, supplements are to be filed by 5:00 p.m. on November 7, 2013. The parties shall be prepared to address the motions to stay the circuit court orders at the oral argument in this matter currently scheduled for November 11, 2013.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-28-2013
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
Comment: Surreply
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-25-2013
|
Motion to Stay
|
|
|
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 10-25-2013 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 7-31-2014 see 11/8/13 order. Comment: Emergency Motion to Stay Appeal, Memo in Support, Affidavits of Kilpatrick and Davis |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-23-2013
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: From Clerk's Office to counsel advising of OA schedule change making this the 2nd case argued at 9:45 on Nov. 11, 2013.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-22-2013
|
Other Brief
Other Brief - Surreply |
|
|
Filed By: M. Padway
Comment: Surreply |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-18-2013
|
Motion to Strike
|
|
|
Filed By: M. Padway
Submit Date: 10-21-2013 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 10-22-2013 ORD that the motion to file a surreply brief is granted and the brief submitted with the motion is accepted for filing. Comment: Strike Appellants' Argument or in Alternative Motion for Leave to file Surreply Brief |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-17-2013
|
Attorney Change
|
|
|
Comment: Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel; delete Attys. Joseph Olson and Michael Screnock
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-04-2013
|
Attorney Change
|
|
|
Comment: Notice of Withdrawal filed; Atty. Means will no longer appear on behalf of defendants-appellants; delete from service list.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-02-2013
|
Assigned for Oral Argument
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-17-2013
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-09-2013
|
Certificate of Filing by Mail
|
|
|
Comment: BAM - Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-04-2013
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae/Non-Party
Brief of Amicus Curiae - Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation |
|
|
Filed By: Daniel Borowski
Comment: Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation; Please note that the brief certification pursuant to Rule 809.19(8)(b) and (c) has been corrected on this brief. Please refer to rule 809.19 regarding the brief certification.Please note that the certification pursuant to Rule 809.19(12)(f) has been corrected on all brief copies. Please include this certification in all briefs. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-03-2013
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-29-2013
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae/Non-Party
Brief of Amicus Curiae - Joint Union Movants |
|
|
Filed By: Timothy Hawks
Comment: Joint Union Movants |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-28-2013
|
Reply Brief-Supreme Court
Reply Brief-Supreme Court |
|
|
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-27-2013
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae/Non-Party
Brief of Amicus Curiae - Elijah Grajkowski, Kristi Lacroix and Nathan Berish |
|
|
Filed By: Richard Esenberg
Comment: Elijah Grajkowski, Kristi Lacroix and Nathan Berish |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-23-2013
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-20-2013
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Andrew Phillips
Submit Date: 8-21-2013 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 8-21-2013 ORD that the motion is granted. Twenty-two copies of the brief shall be filed on or before September 4, 2013. Comment: Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-19-2013
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Timothy Hawks
Submit Date: 8-19-2013 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 8-20-2013 ORD that this court duly notes the addition of AFSCME District Council 48 to the Joint Union Movants, and the Joint Union Movants shall file their non-party brief amicus curiae on or before August 29, 2013. Comment: Joint Union Movants (Corrected) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-19-2013
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae/Non-Party
Brief of Amicus Curiae - City of Milwaukee |
|
|
Filed By: Stuart Mukamal
Comment: City of Milwaukee; Please note an amended signature page per Rule 802.05/809.19(1)(h) has been added to all briefs. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-16-2013
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-15-2013
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Timothy Hawks
Submit Date: 8-15-2013 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 8-15-2013 ORD that the motion is granted. Twenty-two copies of the brief shall be filed on or before August 29, 2013. Comment: Joint Union Movants |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-15-2013
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae/Non-Party
Brief of Amicus Curiae - City of Madison |
|
|
Filed By: Michael May
Comment: City of Madison |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-15-2013
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae/Non-Party
Brief of Amicus Curiae - Laborer's Local 236 and AFSCME Local 60 |
|
|
Filed By: Bruce Ehlke
Comment: Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-15-2013
|
Response Brief-Supreme Court
Response Brief-Supreme Court |
|
|
Filed By: Lester Pines
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-15-2013
|
Response
|
|
|
Comment: 22 copies of any briefs filed or 17 copies of previously filed briefs if party stands on ct. app. briefs
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-14-2013
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-13-2013
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Richard Esenberg
Submit Date: 8-13-2013 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 8-13-2013 ORD that the motion is granted. Twenty-two copies of the brief shall be filed on or before August 27, 2013. Comment: Elijah Grajkowski, Kristi Lacroix and Nathan Berish |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-08-2013
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: From Clerk's Office to counsel: oral argument has been removed from the court's October calendar at reschedule request of AAG Kilpatrick. Counsel will be notified of new date and time for oral argument.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-05-2013
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: John Strange
Submit Date: 8-6-2013 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 8-6-2013 ORD that the motion is granted. Twenty-two copies of the brief shall be filed on or before August 20, 2013. Comment: City of Madison |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-05-2013
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Stuart Mukamal
Submit Date: 8-5-2013 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 8-6-2013 ORD that the motion is granted. Twenty-two copies of the brief shall be filed on or before August 20, 2013. Comment: City of Milwaukee |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-01-2013
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Ltr from AAG Kilpatrick requesting oral argument be scheduled for a time other than the week of October 21-25, 2013; submitted to S.Ct.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-26-2013
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Bruce Ehlke
Submit Date: 7-26-2013 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 7-30-2013 ORD that the motion is granted. Twenty-two copies of the brief shall be filed on or before August 19, 2013. Comment: Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-25-2013
|
First Brief-Supreme Court
First Brief-Supreme Court |
|
|
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Comment: Corrected Brief Separate Appendix Appx to First Brief-Supreme Court |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-24-2013
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 7-25-2013 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 7-25-2013 ORD that the motion is granted and the corrected brief is accepted for filing. Comment: Motion for Leave to File Corrected Brief By Defendants-Appellants |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-15-2013
|
First Brief-Supreme Court
|
|
|
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Comment: Separate Appendix First Brief-Supreme Court |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-11-2013
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: From non-party addressed to C. J. Abrahamson (dated 6/18/13); response from J. A. Nelson to non-party (dated 6/26/13). Both letters placed in file.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
06-14-2013
|
Court Changed to Supreme Court
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
05-06-2013
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Richard Esenberg
Submit Date: 5-7-2013 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 6-14-2013 ORD that the motion is granted and the amicus curiae brief in support of the certification is accepted for filing. Comment: Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
04-25-2013
|
Certification
|
|
|
Filed By: Unassigned District 4
Submit Date: 4-26-2013 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 6-14-2013 ORD certification is granted; 30/20/10 FRO if party elects to file new brief(s), 10 copies of their court of appeals brief(s) must be provided. If a party elects to stand on their court of appeals brief(s), 17 copies of each of their court of appeals brief(s) must be provided. Motion Response Filed By: Steven Means Submit Date: 5-1-2013 See DEC event filed on 4-25-2013 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-25-2013
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Blanchard, Lundsten, Higginbotham
Opinion: Certification Decision: Certification Filed Pages: 24 Order Text: Whether statutory changes accomplished by the passage of 2011 Wis. Act 10 and 2011 Wis. Act 32 fundamentally alter the balance of power between municipal employees and their municipal employers with respect to wages and conditions of employment. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-23-2013
|
Supplement to Record
|
|
|
Comment: 65-3 to 66-1
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-19-2013
|
Submitted on Briefs
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-04-2013
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-15-2013
|
Record and Briefs Sent to District 4
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-14-2013
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Lester Pines
Submit Date: 2-15-2013 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 2-19-2013 ORD that the Respondents motion to file a reply to a non-party brief is denied. Motion Response Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick Submit Date: 2-18-2013 Comment: Motion for Leave to file Response to Non-Party Brief of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-12-2013
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae/Non-Party
Brief of Amicus Curiae - Add'l Wis. Co. Mut. Ins. Corp. & Community Ins. Corp. |
|
|
Filed By: Andrew Phillips
Comment: Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation Appx to Brief of Amicus Curiae-Add'l Wis. Co. Mut. Ins. Corp. & Community Ins. Corp. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-11-2013
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae/Non-Party
Brief of Amicus Curiae - City of Milwaukee |
|
|
Filed By: Rudolph Konrad
Comment: City of Milwaukee |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-06-2013
|
Other Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Comment: Appellants' Reply Memorandum per CTO 12/28/12 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-05-2013
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae/Non-Party
|
|
|
Filed By: Andrew Phillips
Comment: Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation; Separate Appendix |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-01-2013
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Stuart Mukamal
Submit Date: 2-1-2013 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 2-11-2013 ORD that the clerk's office shall accept the non-party brief of the City of Milwaukee for filing, and shall submit all of the briefs to the court for its consideration. Comment: City of Milwaukee |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-01-2013
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Andrew Phillips
Submit Date: 2-1-2013 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 2-5-2013 ORD that the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation may file a non-party brief in this matter. The brief shall be due five business days from the date of this order. FRO that the motion to reconsider permitting the City of Madison to file a non-party brief is denied. Comment: Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-01-2013
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae/Non-Party
Brief of Amicus Curiae - Joint Union Movants |
|
|
Filed By: Timothy Hawks
Comment: Joint Union Movants |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-01-2013
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae/Non-Party
Brief of Amicus Curiae - Elijah Grajkowski, Kristi Lacroix and Nathan Berish |
|
|
Filed By: Thomas Kamenick
Comment: Separate Appendix. Elijah Grajkowski, Kristi Lacroix and Nathan Berish (individual public employees who are members of WEAC affiliates) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-30-2013
|
Other Brief
|
|
|
Comment: Respondents' Supplemental Memorandum per CTO 12/28/12
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-25-2013
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae/Non-Party
Brief of Amicus Curiae - City of Madison |
|
|
Filed By: John Strange
Comment: City of Madison |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-23-2013
|
Interim Motion for Reconsideration
|
|
|
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 1-24-2013 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 2-5-2013 ORD that the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation may file a non-party brief in this matter. The brief shall be due five business days from the date of this order. FRO that the motion to reconsider permitting the City of Madison to file a non-party brief is denied. Motion Response Filed By: John Strange Submit Date: 1-28-2013 Comment: Reconsider Granting of Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief of City of Madison |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-22-2013
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae/Non-Party
Brief of Amicus Curiae - Laborer's Local 236 and AFSCME Local 60 |
|
|
Filed By: Bruce Ehlke
Comment: Laborer's Local 236 and AFSCME Local 60; Received 10 copies of BAM for SC use, PS 8-15-13 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-22-2013
|
Reply Brief
Reply Brief |
|
|
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Comment: Received 10 copies of BRY for SC use, PS 7-9-13 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-22-2013
|
Brief of Respondent(s)
Brief of Respondent(s) |
|
|
Filed By: Lester Pines
Comment: Received 10copies of BRS for SC use, PS 8-15-13 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-18-2013
|
Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
|
|
|
Filed By: Thomas Kamenick
Submit Date: 1-22-2013 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-22-2013 ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order. FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties. FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013. FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-15-2013
|
Other Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Comment: Appellants' Supplemental Memorandum per CTO 12/28/12 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-14-2013
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Timothy Hawks
Submit Date: 1-14-2013 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-22-2013 ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order. FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties. FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013. FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied. Comment: Joint Union Movants |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-09-2013
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Richard Esenberg
Submit Date: 1-10-2013 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-22-2013 ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order. FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties. FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013. FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied. Comment: Elijah Grajkowski, Kristi LaCroix and Nathan Berish |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-09-2013
|
Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
|
|
|
Filed By: Richard Esenberg
Submit Date: 1-10-2013 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-22-2013 ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order. FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties. FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013. FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-08-2013
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Michael May
Submit Date: 1-9-2013 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-22-2013 ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order. FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties. FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013. FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied. Comment: City of Madison |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-04-2013
|
Motion to Intervene
|
|
|
Filed By: Bruce Ehlke
Submit Date: 1-7-2013 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 1-22-2013 ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order. FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties. FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013. FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied. Motion Response Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick Submit Date: 1-22-2013 Comment: "Laborers" |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-28-2012
|
Order
|
|
|
ORD that the appellants shall file a supplemental memorandum, not exceeding 4,500 words, addressing the above questions within 10 business days of this order, and the respondents shall have 10 business days after the appellants' memoranda is filed to submit their own supplemental memorandum, not exceeding 4,500 words. The appellants may then either advise this court that they will not reply or file a reply memorandum, not exceed 3,000 words, within 5 business days. We further direct the parties to provide this court with copies of any materials from the record that are relevant to these issues, if they have not been attached to previous submissions.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-21-2012
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Lester Pines
Submit Date: 12-21-2012 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-22-2013 ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order. FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties. FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013. FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied. See BRS event due on 1-22-2013 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-18-2012
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Lester Pines
Submit Date: 12-18-2012 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-22-2013 ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order. FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties. FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013. FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied. See BRS event due on 1-22-2013 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-14-2012
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Bruce Ehlke
Submit Date: 12-14-2012 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-22-2013 ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order. FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties. FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013. FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied. Comment: Laborers Local 236 and AFSCME Local 60 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-05-2012
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Stuart Mukamal
Submit Date: 12-5-2012 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-22-2013 ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order. FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties. FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013. FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied. Motion Response Filed By: 34783 (St. John, Kevin) Submit Date: 12-19-2012 Comment: Motion for Leave to Reply to Appellants' Memorandum in Opposition to the City of Milwaukee's Petition to Intervene |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-29-2012
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Andrew Phillips
Submit Date: 11-30-2012 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-22-2013 ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order. FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties. FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013. FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied. Motion Response Filed By: Lester Pines Submit Date: 12-10-2012 Comment: Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-20-2012
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Rudolph Konrad
Submit Date: 11-21-2012 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-22-2013 ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order. FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties. FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013. FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied. Motion Response Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick Submit Date: 11-30-2012 Comment: City of Milwaukee's Petition to Intervene |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-20-2012
|
Brief & Appendix of Appellant(s)
Brief of Appellant |
|
|
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Comment: Separate Appendix; Received 10 copies of BAP for SC use, PS 7-9-13 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-02-2012
|
Motion to Dismiss
|
|
|
Filed By: Lester Pines
Submit Date: 11-5-2012 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 11-12-2012 ORD that the respondents' motion to dismiss the appellant's motion for a stay, or in the alternative, to supplement the appellate record is denied. FRO that the time for the respondents to file a response to the pending stay motion is extended, upon the court's own motion, to three business days from the date of this order. Motion Response Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick Submit Date: 11-6-2012 Comment: or, in the alternative, Motion to Supplement the Record |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-25-2012
|
Motion to Stay
|
|
|
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 10-25-2012 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 3-12-2013 ORD that the motion for relief pending appeal is denied. Motion Response Filed By: Lester Pines Submit Date: 11-15-2012 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-11-2012
|
Record
|
|
|
Comment: 1-4 to 64-1, Separate Box
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-20-2012
|
Notif. Sent-Filing of NAP & Ct. Record
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-20-2012
|
Fee Waived
|
|
|
Comment: State
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-20-2012
|
Notice of Appeal & Circuit Court Docket Entries
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-18-2012
|
Statement on Transcript
|
|
|
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Status: Not Needed |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-18-2012
|
Notice of Appeal filed in Circuit Court
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-18-2012
|
Docketing Statement from Appellant
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-14-2012
|
Order of Circuit Court
|
|