State v. Tramell E. Starks
Appeal Number 2010AP000425
Supreme Court
CASE HISTORY
|
Status
|
Court
|
Filing Date
|
Anticipated Due Date
|
Activity
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
04-02-2018
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: From Chase Boruch, dated 3/30/18, seeking cost for copy service of SC-MRC; one-time courtesy copy sent 4/6/18 w/letter indicating cost for future copy service is 40 cents/page per 809.25(2).
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-27-2015
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: From U.S. Supreme Court: petition for writ of certiorari denied 3/23/15
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-11-2014
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: From U.S. Supreme Court: petition for writ of certiorari filed 10/21/14, docketed 11/4/14 as case no. 14-7004
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-28-2014
|
Remittitur
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-24-2014
|
Cites
|
|
|
357 Wis. 2d 142
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-24-2014
|
Cites
|
|
|
849 N.W.2d 724
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-23-2014
|
Public Domain Citation
|
|
|
Comment: PDC No: 2014 WI 91
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-31-2013
|
Motion for Reconsideration
|
|
|
Filed By: Robert Henak
Submit Date: 7-31-2013 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 7-24-2014 IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Reconsideration is denied, without costs. Abrahamson, C.J. wrote concurring order; Prosser, J., wrote concurring order; Bradley, J., joins concurring order. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-31-2013
|
Attorney Change
|
|
|
Comment: Notice of Appearance filed, added Robert Henak, Counsel for Starks, withdrew Bushnell
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-30-2013
|
Motion for Reconsideration
|
|
|
Filed By: Sarah Larson
Submit Date: 8-16-2013 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 7-24-2014 IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Reconsideration is denied, without costs. Abrahamson, C.J. wrote concurring order; Prosser, J., wrote concurring order; Bradley, J., joins concurring order. Comment: State |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-12-2013
|
Cites
|
|
|
349 Wis. 2d 274
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-12-2013
|
Cites
|
|
|
833 N.W.2d 146
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-12-2013
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Abrahamson, Bradley, Crooks, Prosser, Roggensack, Ziegler, Gableman
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Affirmed Pages: 41 Written by: Gableman, Michael J. Abrahamson, Shirley S. Joined Dissenting Opinion Crooks, N. Patrick Joined Dissenting Opinion Bradley, Ann Walsh Wrote Dissenting Opinion 12 pages. Order Text: The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-11-2013
|
Public Domain Citation
|
|
|
Comment: PDC No: 2013 WI 69
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-09-2013
|
Oral Argument
|
|
|
Comment: Atty Tricia Bushnell for Def.-App.-Pet.; AAG Sarah Larson for Pla.-Res.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-14-2012
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-06-2012
|
Reply Brief-Supreme Court
Reply Brief-Supreme Court |
|
|
Filed By: Tricia Bushnell
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-05-2012
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-05-2012
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae
Brief of Amicus Curiae of WI Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers |
|
|
Filed By: Robert Henak
Comment: WI Assn of Criminal Defense Lawyers |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-04-2012
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Robert Henak
Submit Date: 12-4-2012 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 12-5-2012 IT IS ORDERED the motion is granted and the brief is accepted for filing. Comment: WI Assn of Criminal Defense Lawyers |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-03-2012
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-21-2012
|
Response Brief-Supreme Court
Response Brief-Supreme Court |
|
|
Filed By: Sarah Larson
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-15-2012
|
Assigned-Oral Argument
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-22-2012
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-16-2012
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: To all counsel from Clerk's Office notifying of OA removal from December calendar (copy of revised December OA calendar enclosed).
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-05-2012
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Sarah Larson
Submit Date: 10-8-2012 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 10-8-2012 IT IS ORDERED that the motion is granted. Plaintiff-respondent-respondent's response brief shall be served and filed on or before November 21, 2012. No further extensions of time will be granted to this party. See BR2 event due on 11-21-2012 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-04-2012
|
First Brief-Supreme Court
First Brief-Supreme Court |
|
|
Filed By: Tricia Bushnell
Comment: Separate Appendix |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-12-2012
|
Response
|
|
|
Comment: (10 extra copies of Court of Appeals briefs for Supreme Court)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-07-2012
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Tricia Bushnell
Submit Date: 8-7-2012 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 8-14-2012 ORD the motion for extension to file petitioner's brief is granted. Petitioner's brief shall be served and filed on or before 10/4/12. No further extensions of time will be granted to this party. See BR1 event due on 10-4-2012 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-02-2012
|
Caption Amended
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-02-2012
|
Court Changed to Supreme Court
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-17-2012
|
Response
|
|
|
Comment: Response from Atty to 06/21/12 letter; rcvd 7-17-12 from Atty. Tricia J. Bushnell letter acknowledging willingness to represent & statement from Defendant-Appellant accepting Atty. Bushnell as his Counsel
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
06-21-2012
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Rec'd Copy of Letter dated 06/21/12, sent from SC, M. Neuser to WI Innocence Project, Atty. T. Bushnell
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
06-21-2012
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Rec'd Copy of Letter dated 06/21/12, sent from SC, M. Neuser to Tramell E. Starks
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
06-08-2012
|
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
|
|
|
Filed By: Robert Henak
Submit Date: 6-11-2012 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 8-2-2012 IT IS ORDERED that the "Contingent Motion to Withdraw" is hereby deemed withdrawn. Motion Response Filed By: Robert Henak Submit Date: 7-30-2012 Comment: For the WI Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; 07/30/12, Rec'd letter requesting to withdraw motion |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-19-2012
|
Court Order
|
|
|
IT IS ORDERED that, within 10 days of the date of this order, the State is directed to file a response to the following issue: Whether Stark's motion to vacate a DNA surcharge counts as a prior motion for purposes of the successive motion bar under Wis. Stat. 974.06(4) and State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W. 2d 157 (1994), addressing specifically the holdings in State v. Starks, No. 10AP425, unpublished slip op. (wis. Ct. App, June 14, 2011), State v. Matamoros, No. 09AP2982, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App, Dec. 21, 2010), and State v. Nickel, 2010 Wi App 161, 330 Wis. 2d 750, 794 N. W. 2d 765.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
02-03-2012
|
E-Filing Certification
|
|
|
Comment: For Response to Amicus Brief in support of PRE
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-25-2012
|
Court Order
|
|
|
IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff-respondent, State of WI, is directed to file response to the WI Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers' amicus brief in support of the petition for review by 02/07/12.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-26-2011
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae
|
|
|
Filed By: Robert Henak
Comment: WI Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-15-2011
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Sarah Larson
Submit Date: 9-15-2011 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 9-20-2011 IT IS ORDERED the motion is granted. Nine copies of the brief shall be filed on or before 10/04/11. Comment: Motion of Wisconsin Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers for Leave to File Nonparty Brief in Support of Defendant-Appellant Petitioner. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-26-2011
|
Cites
|
|
|
336 Wis. 2d 474
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-26-2011
|
Cites
|
|
|
801 N.W.2d 348
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-26-2011
|
Opinion Ordered Unpublished
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-11-2011
|
Indig. Forms/Motion filed by pro se
|
|
|
Filed By: Tramell Starks
Submit Date: 7-13-2011 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 7-13-2011 IT IS ORDERED court, grants permission to proceed without payment of filing fee. This order only waives the filing fees in the S/C. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-11-2011
|
Court Order
|
|
|
IT IS ORDERED that a statement in support of the petition, conforming to the requirements of Wis. Stat. Sections 809.62(2) and (4), must be filed by the defendant-appellant with the clerk of this court by September 12, 2011. If the statement is not filed by that time, this petition will be summarily dismissed. No further time extensions will be granted; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff-respondent's, State of Wisconsin, response to the petition for review shall be filed within 14 days after service of the defendant-appellant's statement in support.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-06-2011
|
Petition for Review
|
|
|
Filed By: Tramell Starks
Submit Date: 9-12-2011 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 8-2-2012 IT IS ORDERED that the petition for review is granted... Briefs/statements due 30/20/10... IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Attorney Tricia J. Bushnell shall serve as counsel for defendant-appellant-petitioner, Tramell E. Starks. Attorney Bushnell's representation shall be on a pro bono basis and not subject to compensation under SCR ch. 81. The court notes that Tramell E. Starks has given his consent to be represented by Attorney Bushnell ... Motion Response Filed By: Tramell Starks Submit Date: 9-12-2011 Motion Response Filed By: Sarah Larson Submit Date: 9-12-2011 Motion Response Filed By: Sarah Larson Submit Date: 9-28-2011 Motion Response Filed By: Sarah Larson Submit Date: 2-1-2012 Motion Response Filed By: Sarah Larson Submit Date: 3-28-2012 Comment: Statement in support due by 9/12/11 per 7/11/11 cto; Statement in support received 8/29/11, State's response due 9/12/11.' 9/28/11, State's letter response re: Amicus Brief; 02/01/12, Rec'd State's response to Amicus per 1/24/12 cto; 03/28/12, Rec'd State's response |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-06-2011
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Tramell Starks
Submit Date: 7-6-2011 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 7-7-2011 IT IS ORDERED the motion is denied. The 30 day period in which to file a petition for review may not be enlarged. First Wisconsin National Bank of Madison v. Nicholaou, 87 Wis. 2d 360, 274 N. W. 2d 704 (1979); IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the motion itself shall be deemed to be a timely petition for review. IT IS ORDERED the petition for review shall be held in abeyance pending action by the court of appeals on the motion for reconsideration. One the court of appeals has ruled on the motion for reconsideration, an order will be issued notifying the parties of the dates by which they will be required to make further filings. A date will be established by which defendant-appellant will be required to file a statement in support of the petition, conforming to the requirements of Wis. Stat. 809.62(2) and (4). A date will also be established for plaintiff-respondent, State of WI to file a response to the petition for review. Comment: MXT/PRE |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-06-2011
|
Motion for Reconsideration
|
|
|
Filed By: Tramell Starks
Submit Date: 7-6-2011 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 7-8-2011 IT IS ORDERED the motion for reconsideration is denied. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-14-2011
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Curley, Fine, Brennan
Opinion: Per Curiam Decision: Affirmed Pages: 4 Order Text: Order affirmed |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-07-2011
|
Submitted on Briefs
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-05-2011
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-29-2010
|
Record and Briefs Sent to District 1
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-23-2010
|
Reply Brief
Reply Brief |
|
|
Filed By: Tramell Starks
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-16-2010
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Tramell Starks
Submit Date: 11-17-2010 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 11-18-2010 IT IS ORDERED that the deadline for Starks to file his reply brief is extended to December 20, 2010. See BRY event due on 12-20-2010 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-05-2010
|
Brief of Respondent(s)
Brief of Respondent |
|
|
Filed By: Sarah Larson
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-20-2010
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Sarah Larson
Submit Date: 9-21-2010 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 9-22-2010 IT IS ORDERED the deadline for the State to file the respondent's brief in this matter extended to 11/05/10. See BRS event due on 11-5-2010 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-31-2010
|
Attorney Change
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-19-2010
|
Brief & Appx of Appellant(s)
Brief of Appellant(s) |
|
|
Filed By: Tramell Starks
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-22-2010
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Tramell Starks
Submit Date: 7-23-2010 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 7-26-2010 IT IS ORDERED the deadline for Starks to file his appellant's brief and appendix is extended to 09/02/10. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.82(2)(a) (2007-08). See BAP event due on 9-2-2010 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-24-2010
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Tramell Starks
Submit Date: 5-24-2010 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 5-25-2010 IT IS ORDERED that the deadline for Starks to file his appellate brief and appendix is extended through August 2, 2010. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.82(2)(a)(2007-08). See BAP event due on 8-2-2010 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-07-2010
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Tramell Starks
Submit Date: 4-7-2010 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 4-8-2010 IT IS ORDERED that the deadline for Starks to file his brief is extended through June 1, 2010. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.82(2)(a)(2007-08). See BAP event due on 6-1-2010 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-12-2010
|
Record
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-19-2010
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-17-2010
|
Notif. Sent-Filing of NAP & Ct. Record
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-17-2010
|
RAP and Guide Sent
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-17-2010
|
Indigency Forms Sent
|
|
|
Filed By: Unassigned District 1
Submit Date: 3-3-2010 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 3-3-2010 IT IS ORDERED court, grants permission to proceed without payment of filing fee. This order only waives the filing fees in the C/A. Motion Response Filed By: Tramell Starks Submit Date: 3-3-2010 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-16-2010
|
Notice of Appeal & Circuit Court Docket Entries
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-10-2010
|
Notice of Appeal filed in Cir. Ct.
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-09-2010
|
Statement on Transcript
|
|
|
Filed By: Tramell
Status Starks: Prev. Filed |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-01-2010
|
Order of Circuit Court
|
|