Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Scott Walker

Appeal Number 2012AP002067

Supreme Court

CASE HISTORY
Status
Court
Filing Date
Anticipated Due Date
Activity
OCCD
SC
01-06-2015
Remittitur

OCCD
SC
08-20-2014
Motion for Reconsideration
Filed By: M. Padway
Submit Date: 9-3-2014
Decision: (D) Deny
Decision Date: 11-5-2014
ORD that the motion is denied, with $50 costs.
Motion Response
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 9-4-2014
Motion Response
Filed By: M. Padway
Submit Date: 9-12-2014
Motion Response
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 9-18-2014
Motion Response
Filed By: M. Padway
Submit Date: 10-1-2014

OCCD
SC
07-31-2014
Cites
358 Wis. 2d 1

OCCD
SC
07-31-2014
Cites
851 N.W.2d 337

OCCD
SC
07-31-2014
Judge Panel: Abrahamson, Bradley, Crooks, Prosser, Roggensack, Ziegler, Gableman
Opinion: Opinion
Decision: Reversed Pages: 90
Written by: Gableman, Michael J.
Abrahamson, Shirley S. Joined Dissenting Opinion
Crooks, N. Patrick Wrote Concurring Opinion 8 pages.
Bradley, Ann Walsh Wrote Dissenting Opinion 28 pages.
Order Text: The decision and order of the circuit court is reversed.

OCCD
SC
07-30-2014
Public Domain Citation
Comment: PDC No: 2014 WI 99

OCCD
SC
04-30-2014
Briefs Received At State Law Library
Comment: Additional Authorities

OCCD
SC
04-23-2014
Additional Authorities
Comment: filed by AAG Kilpatrick on behalf of defendants-appellants ("the State"); submitted to S.Ct. Additional Authorities-filed by AAG Kilpatrick on behalf of defendants-appellants ("the State")

OCCD
SC
01-22-2014
Briefs Received At State Law Library
Comment: Rsp. to Add'l/Supplemental Authorities

OCCD
SC
01-14-2014
Rsp. to Add'l/Supplemental Authorities
Comment: filed by AAG Kilpatrick on behalf of Defendants-Appellants; submitted to S.Ct. Rsp. to Add'l/Supplemental Authorities-filed by AAG Kilpatrick on behalf of Defandants-Appellants

OCCD
SC
01-13-2014
Briefs Received At State Law Library
Comment: Additional Authorities

OCCD
SC
01-07-2014
Additional Authorities
Comment: filed by Atty. Padway on behalf of plaintiff-respondent Public Employees Union Local 61; submitted to S.Ct. Additional Authorities-Filed by Atty. Padway on behalf of plaintiff-respondent Public Employees Union Local 61

OCCD
SC
11-22-2013
Public Domain Citation
Comment: PDC No: 2013 WI 91

OCCD
SC
11-21-2013
Cites
351 Wis. 2d 237

OCCD
SC
11-21-2013
Cites
839 N.W.2d 388

OCCD
SC
11-21-2013
Court Order
Per Curiam. By the Court. -The contempt order of the circuit court is vacated.
Dissent: Abrahamson, CJ and Bradley, J.

OCCD
SC
11-11-2013
Oral Argument
Comment: at 9:45 a.m., 2nd case (rescheduled from 1:30 p.m.): AG J.B. Van Hollen and AAG Kevin St. John for Def-App; Atty Tamara Packard, M. Nicol Padway, Lester A. Pines for Pla-Res

OCCD
SC
11-08-2013
Court Order
IT IS ORDERED that the non-party union movants' motion to intervene is denied because it is untimely. "The general rule [is] that postjudgment motions for intervention will be granted only upon a strong showing of justification for failure to request intervention sooner and that a postjudgment motion to intervene by its nature prolongs litigation beyond the point anticipated by the original parties." Olivarez v. Unitrin, 2005 WI App 189, 20, 296 Wis. 2d 337, 723 N.W.2d 131. The movants have not asserted that they attempted to intervene in the circuit court or in the court of appeals, nor have they proffered any reason why they could not have done so. Intervention at this late stage will cause delay in the case that has been waiting for our review since June 14, 2013.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of non-party union movants and the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to participate in oral argument are denied. In addition, we also deny the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to intervene. We are confident that the pending motions and contentions regarding the constitutionality of Act 10 and Act 32 will be well addressed by the parties at oral argument and the written filings of all.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendants-Appellants will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address. This time can be divided between argument-in-chief and rebuttal if the Defendants-Appellants so choose. The Plaintiffs-Respondents will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address.
Dissent: Abrahamson, CJ, Bradley, J. and Crooks, J.

OCCD
SC
11-08-2013
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Filed By: Daniel Borowski
Submit Date: 11-8-2013
Decision: (D) Deny
Decision Date: 11-8-2013
ORD that the non-party union movants' motion to intervene is denied because it is untimely. The movants have not asserted that they attempted to intervene in the circuit court or in the court of appeals, nor have they proffered any reason why they could not have done so. Intervention at this late stage will cause delay in the case that has been waiting for our review since June 14, 2013.
FRO that the motion of non-party union movants and the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to participate in oral argument are denied. In addition, we also deny the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to intervene. We are confident that the pending motions and contentions regarding the constituionality of Act 10 and Act 32 will be well addressed by the parties at oral argument and the written filings of all.
FRO that the Defendants-Appellants will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address. This time can be divided between argument-in-chief and rebuttal if the Defendants-Appellants so choose. The Plaintiffs-Respondents will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address.
Shirley S. Abrahamson, C.J., Ann Walsh Bradley, J., and N. Patrick Crooks, J. (dissenting).
Comment: Motion for Leave to Appear and Present Oral Argument

OCCD
SC
11-07-2013
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 11-7-2013
Decision: (O) Other
Decision Date: 11-8-2013
ORD that the non-party union movants' motion to intervene is denied because it is untimely. The movants have not asserted that they attempted to intervene in the circuit court or in the court of appeals, nor have they proffered any reason why they could not have done so. Intervention at this late stage will cause delay in the case that has been waiting for our review since June 14, 2013.
FRO that the motion of non-party union movants and the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to participate in oral argument are denied. In addition, we also deny the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to intervene. We are confident that the pending motions and contentions regarding the constituionality of Act 10 and Act 32 will be well addressed by the parties at oral argument and the written filings of all.
FRO that the Defendants-Appellants will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address. This time can be divided between argument-in-chief and rebuttal if the Defendants-Appellants so choose. The Plaintiffs-Respondents will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address.
Shirley S. Abrahamson, C.J., Ann Walsh Bradley, J., and N. Patrick Crooks, J. (dissenting).
Motion Response
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 11-7-2013
Motion Response
Filed By: Lester Pines
Submit Date: 11-7-2013
Comment: Affidavit of Steven C. Kilpatrick with attached Exhibit C

OCCD
SC
11-07-2013
Motion for Clarification
Filed By: Timothy Hawks
Submit Date: 11-7-2013
Decision: (D) Deny
Decision Date: 11-8-2013
ORD that the non-party union movants' motion to intervene is denied because it is untimely. The movants have not asserted that they attempted to intervene in the circuit court or in the court of appeals, nor have they proffered any reason why they could not have done so. Intervention at this late stage will cause delay in the case that has been waiting for our review since June 14, 2013.
FRO that the motion of non-party union movants and the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to participate in oral argument are denied. In addition, we also deny the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to intervene. We are confident that the pending motions and contentions regarding the constituionality of Act 10 and Act 32 will be well addressed by the parties at oral argument and the written filings of all.
FRO that the Defendants-Appellants will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address. This time can be divided between argument-in-chief and rebuttal if the Defendants-Appellants so choose. The Plaintiffs-Respondents will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address.
Shirley S. Abrahamson, C.J., Ann Walsh Bradley, J., and N. Patrick Crooks, J. (dissenting).
Motion Response
Filed By: Timothy Hawks
Submit Date: 11-7-2013
Motion Response
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 11-8-2013
Motion Response
Filed By: Timothy Hawks
Submit Date: 11-8-2013

OCCD
SC
11-06-2013
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Filed By: M. Padway
Submit Date: 11-6-2013
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 11-8-2013
ORD that the non-party union movants' motion to intervene is denied because it is untimely. The movants have not asserted that they attempted to intervene in the circuit court or in the court of appeals, nor have they proffered any reason why they could not have done so. Intervention at this late stage will cause delay in the case that has been waiting for our review since June 14, 2013.
FRO that the motion of non-party union movants and the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to participate in oral argument are denied. In addition, we also deny the motions of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Company and Community Insurance Corporation to intervene. We are confident that the pending motions and contentions regarding the constituionality of Act 10 and Act 32 will be well addressed by the parties at oral argument and the written filings of all.
FRO that the Defendants-Appellants will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address. This time can be divided between argument-in-chief and rebuttal if the Defendants-Appellants so choose. The Plaintiffs-Respondents will have 45 minutes to argue the topics they choose to address.
Shirley S. Abrahamson, C.J., Ann Walsh Bradley, J., and N. Patrick Crooks, J. (dissenting).
Motion Response
Filed By: Lester Pines
Submit Date: 11-7-2013
Motion Response
Filed By: M. Padway
Submit Date: 11-7-2013
Comment: Motion for Additional Time for Oral Argument Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

OCCD
SC
11-05-2013
Letter/Correspondence
Comment: DOJ's ltr requesting relief from the 11-4-13 CA order.

OCCD
SC
11-05-2013
Additional Authorities
Comment: AG Kilpatrick filed - 12AP2490

OCCD
SC
11-04-2013
Attorney Change
Comment: Delete Kurt C. Kobelt; add Stephen Pieroni for Wisconsin Education Association Council

OCCD
SC
10-29-2013
Additional Authorities
Comment: filed by Atty. Esenberg; submitted to S.Ct.

OCCD
SC
10-29-2013
Court Order
The court of appeals ordinarily considers motions to stay circuit court orders in the first instance, and this court normally does not address such matters until after the court of appeals has ruled. In the interest of judicial economy, we deem it appropriate to follow that established practice in this case. Accordingly, this court will take no action on the defendants-appellants motion to stay until after the court of appeals has issued its decision. If any party seeks relief from the court of appeals decision in this matter, such request for relief shall be filed on the day following the court of appeals decision. If such a request for relief is filed and any party wishes to supplement the filings made in the court of appeals, supplements are to be filed by 5:00 p.m. on November 7, 2013. The parties shall be prepared to address the motions to stay the circuit court orders at the oral argument in this matter currently scheduled for November 11, 2013.

OCCD
SC
10-28-2013
Briefs Received At State Law Library
Comment: Surreply

OCCD
SC
10-25-2013
Motion for Stay
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 10-25-2013
Decision: (O) Other
Decision Date: 7-31-2014
see 11/8/13 order.
Comment: Emergency Motion to Stay Appeal, Memo in Support, Affidavits of Kilpatrick and Davis

OCCD
SC
10-23-2013
Letter/Correspondence
Comment: From Clerk's Office to counsel advising of OA schedule change making this the 2nd case argued at 9:45 on Nov. 11, 2013.

OCCD
SC
10-22-2013
Filed By: M. Padway
Comment: Surreply

OCCD
SC
10-18-2013
Motion to Strike
Filed By: M. Padway
Submit Date: 10-21-2013
Decision: (O) Other
Decision Date: 10-22-2013
ORD that the motion to file a surreply brief is granted and the brief submitted with the motion is accepted for filing.
Comment: Strike Appellants' Argument or in Alternative Motion for Leave to file Surreply Brief

OCCD
SC
10-17-2013
Attorney Change
Comment: Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel; delete Attys. Joseph Olson and Michael Screnock

OCCD
SC
10-04-2013
Attorney Change
Comment: Notice of Withdrawal filed; Atty. Means will no longer appear on behalf of defendants-appellants; delete from service list.

OCCD
SC
10-02-2013
Assigned-Oral Argument

OCCD
SC
09-17-2013
Briefs Received At State Law Library

OCCD
SC
09-09-2013
Certificate of Filing by Mail
Comment: BAM - Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation

OCCD
SC
09-04-2013
Filed By: Daniel Borowski
Comment: Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation; Please note that the brief certification pursuant to Rule 809.19(8)(b) and (c) has been corrected on this brief. Please refer to rule 809.19 regarding the brief certification.Please note that the certification pursuant to Rule 809.19(12)(f) has been corrected on all brief copies. Please include this certification in all briefs.

OCCD
SC
09-03-2013
Briefs Received At State Law Library

OCCD
SC
08-29-2013
Filed By: Timothy Hawks
Comment: Joint Union Movants

OCCD
SC
08-28-2013
Reply Brief-Supreme Court
Reply Brief-Supreme Court
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick

OCCD
SC
08-27-2013
Filed By: Richard Esenberg
Comment: Elijah Grajkowski, Kristi Lacroix and Nathan Berish

OCCD
SC
08-23-2013
Briefs Received At State Law Library

OCCD
SC
08-20-2013
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Filed By: Andrew Phillips
Submit Date: 8-21-2013
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 8-21-2013
ORD that the motion is granted. Twenty-two copies of the brief shall be filed on or before September 4, 2013.
Comment: Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation

OCCD
SC
08-19-2013
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Filed By: Timothy Hawks
Submit Date: 8-19-2013
Decision: (O) Other
Decision Date: 8-20-2013
ORD that this court duly notes the addition of AFSCME District Council 48 to the Joint Union Movants, and the Joint Union Movants shall file their non-party brief amicus curiae on or before August 29, 2013.
Comment: Joint Union Movants (Corrected)

OCCD
SC
08-19-2013
Filed By: Stuart Mukamal
Comment: City of Milwaukee; Please note an amended signature page per Rule 802.05/809.19(1)(h) has been added to all briefs.

OCCD
SC
08-16-2013
Briefs Received At State Law Library

OCCD
SC
08-15-2013
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Filed By: Timothy Hawks
Submit Date: 8-15-2013
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 8-15-2013
ORD that the motion is granted. Twenty-two copies of the brief shall be filed on or before August 29, 2013.
Comment: Joint Union Movants

OCCD
SC
08-15-2013
Filed By: Michael May
Comment: City of Madison

OCCD
SC
08-15-2013
Filed By: Bruce Ehlke
Comment: Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO

OCCD
SC
08-15-2013
Response Brief-Supreme Court
Response Brief-Supreme Court
Filed By: Lester Pines

OCCD
SC
08-15-2013
Response
Comment: 22 copies of any briefs filed or 17 copies of previously filed briefs if party stands on ct. app. briefs

OCCD
SC
08-14-2013
Briefs Received At State Law Library

OCCD
SC
08-13-2013
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Filed By: Richard Esenberg
Submit Date: 8-13-2013
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 8-13-2013
ORD that the motion is granted. Twenty-two copies of the brief shall be filed on or before August 27, 2013.
Comment: Elijah Grajkowski, Kristi Lacroix and Nathan Berish

OCCD
SC
08-08-2013
Letter/Correspondence
Comment: From Clerk's Office to counsel: oral argument has been removed from the court's October calendar at reschedule request of AAG Kilpatrick. Counsel will be notified of new date and time for oral argument.

OCCD
SC
08-05-2013
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Filed By: John Strange
Submit Date: 8-6-2013
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 8-6-2013
ORD that the motion is granted. Twenty-two copies of the brief shall be filed on or before August 20, 2013.
Comment: City of Madison

OCCD
SC
08-05-2013
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Filed By: Stuart Mukamal
Submit Date: 8-5-2013
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 8-6-2013
ORD that the motion is granted. Twenty-two copies of the brief shall be filed on or before August 20, 2013.
Comment: City of Milwaukee

OCCD
SC
08-01-2013
Letter/Correspondence
Comment: Ltr from AAG Kilpatrick requesting oral argument be scheduled for a time other than the week of October 21-25, 2013; submitted to S.Ct.

OCCD
SC
07-26-2013
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Filed By: Bruce Ehlke
Submit Date: 7-26-2013
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 7-30-2013
ORD that the motion is granted. Twenty-two copies of the brief shall be filed on or before August 19, 2013.
Comment: Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO

OCCD
SC
07-25-2013
First Brief-Supreme Court
First Brief-Supreme Court
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Comment: Corrected Brief Separate Appendix Appx to First Brief-Supreme Court

OCCD
SC
07-24-2013
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 7-25-2013
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 7-25-2013
ORD that the motion is granted and the corrected brief is accepted for filing.
Comment: Motion for Leave to File Corrected Brief By Defendants-Appellants

OCCD
SC
07-15-2013
First Brief-Supreme Court
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick

Comment: Separate Appendix First Brief-Supreme Court

OCCD
SC
07-11-2013
Letter/Correspondence
Comment: From non-party addressed to C. J. Abrahamson (dated 6/18/13); response from J. A. Nelson to non-party (dated 6/26/13). Both letters placed in file.

OCCD
SC
06-14-2013
Court Changed to Supreme Court

OCCD
SC
05-06-2013
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Filed By: Richard Esenberg
Submit Date: 5-7-2013
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 6-14-2013
ORD that the motion is granted and the amicus curiae brief in support of the certification is accepted for filing.
Comment: Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty

OCCD
SC
04-25-2013
Certification Filed
Filed By: Unassigned District 4
Submit Date: 4-26-2013
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 6-14-2013
ORD certification is granted; 30/20/10
FRO if party elects to file new brief(s), 10 copies of their court of appeals brief(s) must be provided. If a party elects to stand on their court of appeals brief(s), 17 copies of each of their court of appeals brief(s) must be provided.
Motion Response
Filed By: Steven Means
Submit Date: 5-1-2013
See DEC event filed on 4-25-2013

OCCD
CA
04-25-2013
Judge Panel: Blanchard, Lundsten, Higginbotham
Opinion: Certification
Decision: Certification Filed Pages: 24
Order Text: Whether statutory changes accomplished by the passage of 2011 Wis. Act 10 and 2011 Wis. Act 32 fundamentally alter the balance of power between municipal employees and their municipal employers with respect to wages and conditions of employment.

OCCD
CA
04-23-2013
Supplement to Record
Comment: 65-3 to 66-1

OCCD
CA
03-19-2013
Submitted on Briefs

OCCD
CA
03-04-2013
Briefs Received At State Law Library

OCCD
CA
02-15-2013
Record and Briefs Sent to District 4

OCCD
CA
02-14-2013
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Filed By: Lester Pines
Submit Date: 2-15-2013
Decision: (D) Deny
Decision Date: 2-19-2013
ORD that the Respondents motion to file a reply to a non-party brief is denied.
Motion Response
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 2-18-2013
Comment: Motion for Leave to file Response to Non-Party Brief of Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation

OCCD
CA
02-12-2013
Filed By: Andrew Phillips

Comment: Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation Appx to Brief of Amicus Curiae-Add'l Wis. Co. Mut. Ins. Corp. & Community Ins. Corp.

OCCD
CA
02-11-2013
Filed By: Rudolph Konrad

Comment: City of Milwaukee

OCCD
CA
02-06-2013
Other Brief
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick

Comment: Appellants' Reply Memorandum per CTO 12/28/12

OCCD
CA
02-05-2013
Brief of Amicus Curiae
Filed By: Andrew Phillips

Comment: Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation; Separate Appendix

OCCD
CA
02-01-2013
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Filed By: Stuart Mukamal
Submit Date: 2-1-2013
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 2-11-2013
ORD that the clerk's office shall accept the non-party brief of the City of Milwaukee for filing, and shall submit all of the briefs to the court for its consideration.
Comment: City of Milwaukee

OCCD
CA
02-01-2013
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Filed By: Andrew Phillips
Submit Date: 2-1-2013
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 2-5-2013
ORD that the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation may file a non-party brief in this matter. The brief shall be due five business days from the date of this order.
FRO that the motion to reconsider permitting the City of Madison to file a non-party brief is denied.
Comment: Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation

OCCD
CA
02-01-2013
Filed By: Timothy Hawks

Comment: Joint Union Movants

OCCD
CA
02-01-2013
Filed By: Thomas Kamenick

Comment: Separate Appendix. Elijah Grajkowski, Kristi Lacroix and Nathan Berish (individual public employees who are members of WEAC affiliates)

OCCD
CA
01-30-2013
Other Brief
Comment: Respondents' Supplemental Memorandum per CTO 12/28/12

OCCD
CA
01-25-2013
Filed By: John Strange

Comment: City of Madison

OCCD
CA
01-23-2013
Interim Motion for Reconsideration
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 1-24-2013
Decision: (D) Deny
Decision Date: 2-5-2013
ORD that the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation may file a non-party brief in this matter. The brief shall be due five business days from the date of this order.
FRO that the motion to reconsider permitting the City of Madison to file a non-party brief is denied.
Motion Response
Filed By: John Strange
Submit Date: 1-28-2013
Comment: Reconsider Granting of Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief of City of Madison

OCCD
CA
01-23-2013
Rejected Electronic Document
Comment: City of Madison Non-Party Brief Appendix: The e-file is rejected. See order dated January 22, 2013.

OCCD
CA
01-23-2013
Rejected Electronic Document
Comment: City of Madison Non-Party Brief: The e-file is rejected because the brief exceeds the permissible length. See order dated January 22, 2013.

OCCD
CA
01-22-2013
Filed By: Bruce Ehlke

Comment: Laborer's Local 236 and AFSCME Local 60; Received 10 copies of BAM for SC use, PS 8-15-13

OCCD
CA
01-22-2013
Reply Brief
Reply Brief
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick

Comment: Received 10 copies of BRY for SC use, PS 7-9-13

OCCD
CA
01-22-2013
Brief of Respondent(s)
Brief of Respondent(s)
Filed By: Lester Pines

Comment: Received 10copies of BRS for SC use, PS 8-15-13

OCCD
CA
01-18-2013
Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
Filed By: Thomas Kamenick
Submit Date: 1-22-2013
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 1-22-2013
ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order.
FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties.
FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013.
FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied.

OCCD
CA
01-15-2013
Other Brief
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick

Comment: Appellants' Supplemental Memorandum per CTO 12/28/12

OCCD
CA
01-14-2013
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Filed By: Timothy Hawks
Submit Date: 1-14-2013
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 1-22-2013
ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order.
FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties.
FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013.
FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied.
Comment: Joint Union Movants

OCCD
CA
01-09-2013
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Filed By: Richard Esenberg
Submit Date: 1-10-2013
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 1-22-2013
ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order.
FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties.
FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013.
FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied.
Comment: Elijah Grajkowski, Kristi LaCroix and Nathan Berish

OCCD
CA
01-09-2013
Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
Filed By: Richard Esenberg
Submit Date: 1-10-2013
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 1-22-2013
ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order.
FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties.
FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013.
FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied.

OCCD
CA
01-08-2013
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Filed By: Michael May
Submit Date: 1-9-2013
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 1-22-2013
ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order.
FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties.
FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013.
FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied.
Comment: City of Madison

OCCD
CA
01-04-2013
Motion to Intervene
Filed By: Bruce Ehlke
Submit Date: 1-7-2013
Decision: (D) Deny
Decision Date: 1-22-2013
ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order.
FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties.
FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013.
FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied.
Motion Response
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 1-22-2013
Comment: "Laborers"

OCCD
CA
12-28-2012
Court Order
ORD that the appellants shall file a supplemental memorandum, not exceeding 4,500 words, addressing the above questions within 10 business days of this order, and the respondents shall have 10 business days after the appellants' memoranda is filed to submit their own supplemental memorandum, not exceeding 4,500 words. The appellants may then either advise this court that they will not reply or file a reply memorandum, not exceed 3,000 words, within 5 business days. We further direct the parties to provide this court with copies of any materials from the record that are relevant to these issues, if they have not been attached to previous submissions.

OCCD
CA
12-21-2012
Motion to Extend Time
Filed By: Lester Pines
Submit Date: 12-21-2012
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 1-22-2013
ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order.
FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties.
FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013.
FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied.
See BRS event due on 1-22-2013

OCCD
CA
12-18-2012
Motion to Extend Time
Filed By: Lester Pines
Submit Date: 12-18-2012
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 1-22-2013
ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order.
FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties.
FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013.
FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied.
See BRS event due on 1-22-2013

OCCD
CA
12-14-2012
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Filed By: Bruce Ehlke
Submit Date: 12-14-2012
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 1-22-2013
ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order.
FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties.
FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013.
FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied.
Comment: Laborers Local 236 and AFSCME Local 60

OCCD
CA
12-05-2012
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Filed By: Stuart Mukamal
Submit Date: 12-5-2012
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 1-22-2013
ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order.
FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties.
FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013.
FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied.
Motion Response
Filed By: 34783 (St. John, Kevin)
Submit Date: 12-19-2012
Comment: Motion for Leave to Reply to Appellants' Memorandum in Opposition to the City of Milwaukee's Petition to Intervene

OCCD
CA
11-29-2012
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Filed By: Andrew Phillips
Submit Date: 11-30-2012
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 1-22-2013
ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order.
FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties.
FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013.
FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied.
Motion Response
Filed By: Lester Pines
Submit Date: 12-10-2012
Comment: Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and Community Insurance Corporation

OCCD
CA
11-21-2012
Attorney address updated
Comment: Address changed for attorney: 33656 Joseph Louis Olson

OCCD
CA
11-20-2012
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Filed By: Rudolph Konrad
Submit Date: 11-21-2012
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 1-22-2013
ORD that we accept the Respondents' brief and the Appellants' reply brief as timely filed as of the date of this order.
FRO that we grant the City of Milwaukee's motion to file a reply on its motion to intervene as a respondent, but deny the motion for intervention. We also deny the motion of the Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO to intervene as parties.
FRO that we grant all four of the motions to file non-party briefs on the merits of the appeal, as well as the request to have attorneys admitted pro hac vice to represent the WEAC affiliates. The non-party briefs shall be limited to 13 pages or 3000 words, and shall be due February 1, 2013.
FRO that the motion of the Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation and the Community Insurance Corporation to participate on the pending stay motion is denied.
Motion Response
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 11-30-2012
Comment: City of Milwaukee's Petition to Intervene

OCCD
CA
11-20-2012
Brief & Appx of Appellant(s)
Brief of Appellant
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick

Comment: Separate Appendix; Received 10 copies of BAP for SC use, PS 7-9-13

OCCD
CA
11-02-2012
Motion to Dismiss
Filed By: Lester Pines
Submit Date: 11-5-2012
Decision: (D) Deny
Decision Date: 11-12-2012
ORD that the respondents' motion to dismiss the appellant's motion for a stay, or in the alternative, to supplement the appellate record is denied.
FRO that the time for the respondents to file a response to the pending stay motion is extended, upon the court's own motion, to three business days from the date of this order.
Motion Response
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 11-6-2012
Comment: or, in the alternative, Motion to Supplement the Record

OCCD
CA
10-25-2012
Motion for Stay
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 10-25-2012
Decision: (D) Deny
Decision Date: 3-12-2013
ORD that the motion for relief pending appeal is denied.
Motion Response
Filed By: Lester Pines
Submit Date: 11-15-2012

OCCD
CA
10-11-2012
Record
Comment: 1-4 to 64-1, Separate Box

OCCD
CA
09-20-2012
Notif. Sent-Filing of NAP & Ct. Record

OCCD
CA
09-20-2012
Fee Waived
Comment: State

OCCD
CA
09-20-2012
Notice of Appeal & Court Record

OCCD
CA
09-18-2012
Statement on Transcript
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Status: Not Needed

OCCD
CA
09-18-2012
Notice of Appeal filed in Cir. Ct.

OCCD
CA
09-18-2012
Docketing Statement from Appellant

OCCD
CA
09-14-2012
Order of Circuit Court