State v. Tavodess Matthews

Appeal Number 2018AP002142

Supreme Court

CASE HISTORY
Status
Court
Filing Date
Anticipated Due Date
Activity
PEND
SC
10-19-2020
Response Brief-Supreme Court

OCCD
SC
09-29-2020
Certificate of Filing by Mail
Comment: RE: BR1 Brief and Appendix, Mailed 9-24-2020, Copies (22), COS.

OCCD
SC
09-29-2020
Filed By: Dustin Haskell
Comment: Appendix - First Brief-Supreme Court Ack. Notice - First Brief-Supreme Court

OCCD
SC
09-02-2020
Response
Comment: Justice Dallet participation - responses not received

OCCD
SC
08-26-2020
Caption Amended

OCCD
SC
08-26-2020
Letter/Correspondence
Comment: Justice Dallet to SPD Haskell and AAG Shaeffer advising she will participate in case, should they choose to respond, response due no later than noon 9/2/20

OCCD
SC
08-26-2020
Court Changed to Supreme Court

OCCD
CA
07-08-2020
Final Publication

OCCD
CA
06-24-2020
Cites
946 N.W.2d 200

OCCD
CA
06-24-2020
Opinion Ordered Published

OCCD
CA
06-24-2020
Public Domain Citation
Comment: PDC No: 2020 WI App 33

OCCD
SC
06-15-2020
Letter/Correspondence
Comment: State opposed petition for review, will not file formal response unless ordered by court.

OCCD
SC
06-10-2020
Petition for Review
Filed By: Dustin Haskell
Submit Date: 6-17-2020
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 8-26-2020
IT IS ORDERED that the petition for review is granted and that pursuant to Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.62(6), the respondent-appellant-petitioner may not raise or argue issues not set forth in the petition for review unless otherwise ordered by the court; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Wis. Stat. (Rules) 809.62(6) and 809.63, within 30 days after the date of this order the respondent-appellant-petitioner must file a brief in this court; that within 20 days of filing the petitioner-respondent, State of Wisconsin, must file either a brief or a statement that no brief will be filed; and that if a brief is filed by the petitioner-respondent, within 10 days of filing the respondent-appellant-petitioner must file either a reply brief or a statement that no reply brief will be filed; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in any brief filed in this court the parties shall not incorporate by reference any portion of their court of appeals' brief or petition for review or response; instead, any material in these documents upon which there is reliance should be restated in the brief filed in this court; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the first brief filed in this court must contain, as part of the appendix, a copy of the decision of the court of appeals in this case; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if a party has not previously filed an electronic copy of the briefs filed on behalf of that party in the court of appeals, the party, within 30 days after the date of this order, must provide the clerk of this court with 10 copies of the brief previously filed on behalf of that party in the court of appeals; but if the party has already filed an electronic copy of such briefs, then there is no obligation to provide additional copies of those briefs to the clerk of this court; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the allowance of costs, if any, in connection with the gran
Comment: Court order 8/26/20

OCCD
CA
05-12-2020
Judge Panel: Dugan, Brash, Donald
Opinion: Opinion
Decision: Affirmed Pages: 10
Written by: Dugan, Timothy G.
Order Text: Order affirmed

OCCD
CA
12-05-2019
Submitted on Briefs

OCCD
CA
08-19-2019
Briefs Received At State Law Library

OCCD
CA
08-05-2019
Record and Briefs Sent to District 1

OCCD
CA
08-02-2019
Certificate of Filing by Mail
Comment: Re: Reply Brief; Rcvd 10 copies of briefs, mailed, 07-31-2019.

OCCD
CA
08-02-2019
Reply Brief
Reply Brief
Filed By: Dustin Haskell

OCCD
CA
07-24-2019
Motion to Extend Time
Filed By: Dustin Haskell
Submit Date: 7-24-2019
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 7-26-2019
ORD that the time for the appellant to file the reply brief is extended to August 5, 2019. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.82(2)(a) (2017-18).
See BRY event due on 8-5-2019
Comment: 2

OCCD
CA
06-24-2019
Motion to Extend Time
Filed By: Dustin Haskell
Submit Date: 6-24-2019
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 6-26-2019
IT IS ORDERED that the deadline for Matthews tof ile the reply brief in this matter is extended to July 24, 2019.
See BRY event due on 7-24-2019

OCCD
CA
06-07-2019
Brief of Respondent(s)
Brief of Respondent(s)
Filed By: Sara Shaeffer

OCCD
CA
05-28-2019
Motion to Extend Time
Filed By: Sara Shaeffer
Submit Date: 5-28-2019
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 5-29-2019
IT IS ORDERED that the deadline for the State to file the respondent's brief in this matter is extended to June 28, 2019.
See BRS event due on 6-28-2019

OCCD
CA
04-30-2019
Certificate of Filing by Mail
Comment: RE: Appellant's Brief, Shipped 4-26-19, COS

OCCD
CA
04-30-2019
Brief & Appx of Appellant(s)
Brief of Appellant
Filed By: Dustin Haskell

Comment: Appx to Brief of Appellant(s)

OCCD
CA
03-21-2019
Record
Comment: 1-65 to 15-1, ELECTRONICALLY FILED

OCCD
CA
03-06-2019
Attorney Change
Comment: SPD Haskell appears for applnt. per notice of subsitution of counsel

OCCD
CA
03-06-2019
Received SPD Appointment Order
Comment: Dustin C. Haskell

OCCD
CA
03-06-2019
Statement on Transcript
Filed By: Dustin Haskell
Status: Prev. Filed

OCCD
CA
03-04-2019
Notif. Sent-Filing of LVO & Court Record

OCCD
CA
03-04-2019
Copy of CTO Grtg. PLV-from Cir. Ct.

OCCD
CA
02-15-2019
Copy of CTO Grtg. PLV Filed in Cir. Ct.

OCCD
CA
02-14-2019
Caption Amended

OCCD
CA
11-28-2018
Attorney Change
Comment: AG Shaeffer added, Kawski and Potter removed

OCCD
CA
11-27-2018
Certificate of Service
Comment: AG's statement PLV was served (hand delivery) 11/26/18

OCCD
CA
11-26-2018
Response
Comment: per 11/20/18 CTO Matthews to serve State w/ petition

OCCD
CA
11-26-2018
Certificate of Service
Comment: SPD (re: service of petition for leave to appeal)

OCCD
CA
11-20-2018
Court Order
IT IS ORDERED that Matthews shall serve the Attorney General, as counsel for respondent, with his petition for leave to appeal by November 27, 2018.
IT IS FURTHER ORDRED that, once service is complete, Matthews shall file a statement with this court, confirming the date and manner of service.
See PLV event filed on 11-12-2018

OCCD
CA
11-16-2018
Affidavit of No Service filed
Comment: State has not rcvd. petition for leave to appeal

OCCD
CA
11-12-2018
Fee Waived
Comment: SPD

OCCD
CA
11-12-2018
Petition for Leave to Appeal
Filed By: Michael Jude
Submit Date: 11-12-2018
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 2-14-2019
IT IS ORDERED that the petition for leave to appeal is granted. Entry of this order has the effect of the filing of a notice of appeal. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.50(3). A copy of this order has been forwarded to the clerk of the circuit court. Pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.11(2), the clerk shall return this order and the docket entries maintained pursuant to WIS. STAT. 59.40 within three days of receipt of this order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the alternative request for a supervisory writ is denied ex parte.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no costs shall be recovered by any party.
Motion Response
Filed By: Sara Shaeffer
Submit Date: 12-11-2018
This motion contains court order(s).

OCCD
CA
11-12-2018
X Transfer

OCCD
CA
10-04-2018
Miscellaneous Motion on XX-Case
Filed By: Alejandro Lockwood
Submit Date: 10-5-2018
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 10-9-2018
ORD that the deadline for filing a petition for leave to appeal is extended until November 9, 2018.
Comment: MXT to file PLV

OCCD
CA
09-20-2018
Non-Final Order of Circuit Court