Outagamie County v. R. G. K.
Appeal Number 2019AP002134
CONFIDENTIAL
Court of Appeals District 3
CASE HISTORY
|
Status
|
Court
|
Filing Date
|
Anticipated Due Date
|
Activity
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-16-2022
|
Remittitur
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-28-2022
|
Cites
|
|
|
982 N.W.2d 350
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-28-2022
|
Cites
|
|
|
404 Wis. 2d 750
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-28-2022
|
Opinion Ordered Unpublished
|
|
|
Comment: Opinion Ordered Unpublished; Opinion Ordered Unpublished (Amended)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-07-2022
|
Motion for Reconsideration
|
|
|
Filed By: Kyle Sargent
Submit Date: 10-7-2022 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 10-12-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-20-2022
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Stark
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Reversed Pages: 16 Order Text: Order reversed Comment: Opinion/Decision |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-05-2022
|
Sua Sponte
|
|
|
Filed By: Unassigned District 3
Submit Date: 8-8-2022 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 8-9-2022 IT IS ORDERED that this appeal shall be submitted to the court and placed upon the conference calendar based upon the briefs that have already been filed. Comment: County's Correspondence re: no supplemental brief will be filed |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-01-2022
|
Sua Sponte
|
|
|
Filed By: Unassigned District 3
Submit Date: 8-2-2022 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 8-4-2022 IT IS ORDERED that, if Outagamie County still contends that this appeal is moot, it shall file a supplemental brief no longer than twenty pages regarding the impact of S.A.M. on the issue of mootness within fifteen days of this order. If Outagamie County files a supplemental brief, R.G.K. shall have fifteen days to file its own supplemental brief no longer than twenty pages. Comment: Letter from corp counsel seeking clarification of 7/13/22 cto |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-11-2022
|
Sua Sponte
|
|
|
Filed By: Unassigned District 3
Submit Date: 7-12-2022 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 7-13-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file supplemental briefs addressing whether this appeal is moot in light of S.A.M. and, if so, whether any exceptions to the mootness doctrine appeal. R.G.K.'s brief shall be filed within fifteen days of the date of this order, and Outagamie County's brief shall be filed within fifteen days after R.G.K.'s brief is filed. The briefs shall be no longer than twenty pages. Comment: Letter to Court re: SAM case, filed by Atty Rich |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-11-2022
|
Hold Status
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-23-2021
|
Sua Sponte
|
|
|
Filed By: Unassigned District 3
Submit Date: 4-23-2021 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 4-26-2021 IT IS ORDERED that the courts April 22, 2021 order for supplemental briefing is withdrawn. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal is on hold pending the Wisconsin Supreme Court's decision in Sauk County v. S.A.M., No. 2019AP1033. Comment: Letter from Atty Guidote re: supplemental briefing |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-22-2021
|
Court Order
|
|
|
IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file supplemental briefs that address the identified issues. R.G.K.'s brief shall be filed within fifteen days of the date of this order, and Outagamie County's brief shall be filed within fifteen days after R.G.K.'s brief is filed. The briefs shall be no longer than twenty pages. WITHDRAWN per cto 4/26/21.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-23-2020
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-14-2020
|
Court Order
|
|
|
A paper copy of the Reply brief has been filed by the respondent-appellant's attorney. This document has not been filed in electronic form as required by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(12) or 809.32(1)(fm). Counsel shall file a copy of the document in electronic form within 5 days of the date of this order or file a motion under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(12)(g) or 809.32(1)(fm) seeking relief from the electronic filing requirement. Failure to file the document in electronic form or to file a motion may result in the imposition of a penalty under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.83(2). See also WIS. STAT. RULE 809.80(5)(b).
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-13-2020
|
Submitted on Briefs
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-12-2020
|
Record and Briefs Sent to District 3
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-09-2020
|
Reply Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Elizabeth Rich
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-25-2020
|
Certificate of Filing by Mail
|
|
|
Comment: respondent's brief 10 copies mailed 09-24-2020 (IB)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-25-2020
|
Brief of Respondent(s)
|
|
|
Filed By: Kyle Sargent
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-18-2020
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The electronic version of the brief uploaded under appeal number 19AP2134 is rejected because the document that was uploaded is actually the fast-track respondent's brief filed in appeal number 20AP1171-FT.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-27-2020
|
Motion to Correct/Supplement Record
|
|
|
Filed By: Kyle Sargent
Submit Date: 5-11-2020 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 9-16-2020 IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss this appeal is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to supplement the record is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the respondent's brief is due thirty days from the date of this order. Motion Response Filed By: Elizabeth Rich Submit Date: 5-11-2020 Comment: Court Order of 9/16/20 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-27-2020
|
Motion to Dismiss
|
|
|
Filed By: Kyle Sargent
Submit Date: 5-11-2020 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 9-16-2020 IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss this appeal is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to supplement the record is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the respondent's brief is due thirty days from the date of this order. Motion Response Filed By: Elizabeth Rich Submit Date: 5-11-2020 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-19-2020
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Kyle Sargent
Submit Date: 2-19-2020 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 2-20-2020 ORD that the time for filing the respondent's brief is extended to March 27, 2020. See BRS event due on 3-27-2020 Comment: duplicate motion rec'd via US Mail 2/24/20 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-14-2020
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The corrected electronic version of the Appellant's brief is rejected for the following reasons:
- The document's cover page identifies it as "Appendix to Initial Brief of Respondent-Appellant"
- The tables of contents and authorities are missing
- The text positioning in the hardcopy does not match the text on the electronic version, therefore the two are not identical
- The form and length and electronic certifications are missing
Please upload a corrected, complete electronic version of the brief that is identical to the hardcopies as certified by Rule 809.19(12)(f). Please notify clerk's office staff when done by calling 608-266-1880. Failure to notify will result in the delayed acceptance of the corrected e-document.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-03-2020
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by Deputy Corp. Counsel Kyle J. Sargent.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-31-2020
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The electronic version of the Brief of Appellant is rejected because it contains both the brief and appendix. Rule 809.19(13)(c) states, in part, that an electronic appendix shall be filed as a document or documents separate from the brief.
You are not required to file an electronic version of the appendix but if you opt to do so you must also include the requisite electronic appendix certification pursuant to Rule 809.19(13)(f) and load a separate, corrected electronic appendix that includes the certification.
If you opt to exclude the appendix in your electronic filing you may simply upload a corrected version of the electronic brief that excludes the appendix documents. Please contact clerk's office staff by calling 608-266-1880 when done so that the brief may be accepted for filing. Failure to notify may result in delayed acceptance of the corrected e-document.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-27-2020
|
Brief & Appx of Appellant(s)
|
|
|
Filed By: Elizabeth Rich
Comment: Appendix to Brief of Appellant(s) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-17-2019
|
Record
|
|
|
Comment: 1-6 to 61-6 ELECTRONICALLY FILED
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-04-2019
|
Statement on Transcript
|
|
|
Filed By: Elizabeth Rich
Status: Prev. Filed |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-18-2019
|
Interim Motion for Reconsideration
|
|
|
Filed By: Joseph Guidote
Submit Date: 11-18-2019 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 11-19-2019 ORD that the motion for reconsideration of this court's November 13, 2019 order is denied. Comment: Letter from Atty Guidote re: 11/13/19 cto |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-18-2019
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by Corporation Counsel, Joseph P. Guidote, Jr.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-12-2019
|
Notif. Sent-Filing of NAP & Ct. Record
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-12-2019
|
Fee Waived
|
|
|
Comment: SPD order on file
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-12-2019
|
Notice of Appeal & Court Record
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-12-2019
|
X Transfer
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-05-2019
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Elizabeth Rich
Submit Date: 11-12-2019 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 11-13-2019 ORD that the time for filing a notice of appeal is extended to make timely the notice of appeal filed in the circuit court on 11/5/19. Comment: Motion to Enlarge Time for Filing Notice of Appeal or Motion for Post-judgment Relief |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-05-2019
|
Notice of Appeal filed in Cir. Ct.
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-05-2019
|
Docketing Statement from Appellant
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-25-2019
|
MXT to appoint counsel & order trans.
|
|
|
Filed By: Joseph E
Submit Date: 7-26-2019 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 7-26-2019 ORD that the deadline for the state public defender to appoint postcommitment counsel and to order transcripts is extended through July 11, 2019. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-07-2019
|
Order of Circuit Court
|
|