Edward A. Vanderventer v. Hyundai Motor America
Appeal Number 2020AP001052
Court of Appeals District 2
CASE HISTORY
|
Status
|
Court
|
Filing Date
|
Anticipated Due Date
|
Activity
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-06-2023
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Returned Mail
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-21-2023
|
Remittitur
|
|
|
Comment: NRI sent by FedEx
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-20-2023
|
Rsp. to Add'l/Supplemental Authorities
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by Attorney Jesse Blocher for Respondents
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-19-2023
|
Additional Authorities
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by Attorney Ryan Walsh for Hyundai Motor America and Hyundai Motor Company
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-06-2023
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Returned Mail (3)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-28-2022
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Returned Mail (2)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-27-2022
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Returned Mail
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-20-2022
|
Final Publication
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-16-2022
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Ryan Walsh
Submit Date: 12-16-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 12-20-2022 IT IS ORDERED that both motions are granted. The briefs submitted with the respective motions are accepted as filed. Comment: Motion to File Reply to Response to Petition for Review |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-15-2022
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Jesse Blocher
Submit Date: 12-15-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 12-20-2022 IT IS ORDERED that both motions are granted. The briefs submitted with the respective motions are accepted as filed. Comment: Motion to File Response to Briefs of Amicus Curiae in Support of Petition for Review |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-14-2022
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Attorney Stacy A. Alexejun for the Appellants
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-14-2022
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Attorney Matthew J. Splitek for the Appellants
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-14-2022
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Attorney Evan W. Thomsen for the Appellants
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-14-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Court error - duplicate filing. No action necessary.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-14-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Court error - duplicate filing. No action necessary.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-14-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Court error - duplicate filing. No action necessary.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-14-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Court error - duplicate filing. No action necessary.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-14-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Court error - duplicate filing. No action necessary.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-14-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Court error - duplicate filing. No action necessary.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-14-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Court error - duplicate filing. No action necessary.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-14-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Court error - duplicate filing. No action necessary.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-14-2022
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae
|
|
|
Filed By: Matthew Fernholz
Comment: Washington Legal Foundation in Support of Petition for Review |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-14-2022
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae
|
|
|
Filed By: Andrew Cook
Comment: American Tort Reform Association in Support of Petition for Review |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-14-2022
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae
|
|
|
Filed By: Kendall Harrison
Comment: Alliance for Automotive Innovation (AAI) in Support of Petition for Review |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-14-2022
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae
|
|
|
Filed By: Jessie Augustyn
Comment: Wisconsin Legislature in Support of Petition for Review |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-14-2022
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae
|
|
|
Filed By: Douglas Poland
Comment: FCA US LLC in Support of Petition for Review |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-14-2022
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae
|
|
|
Filed By: Misha Tseytlin
Comment: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, the National Association of Manufacturers, and Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce in Support of Petition for Review |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-14-2022
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae
|
|
|
Filed By: Lisa Lawless
Comment: Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc. (PLAC) in Support of Petition for Review |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-14-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Court error - duplicate filing. No action necessary.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-12-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Motion for Leave to File a Non-Party Brief; A paper copy of this motion has already been received and put on the case. No action necessary.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-12-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: MOTION OF THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, AND WISCONSIN MANUFACTURERS AND COMMERCE AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS; A paper copy of this motion has already been received and put on the case. No action necessary.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-12-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Motion of Amicus Curiae Wisconsin Legislature for Leave to File Non-Party Brief in Support of Petitioners; A paper copy of this motion has been received and already put on the case. No action necessary.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-12-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Notice of Appearance; A paper copy of this notice has been received and already put on the case. No action necessary.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-12-2022
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Cover Letter to Response in Opposition to Motions to File Amicus/Non-Party Briefs (Alliance for Automoative Innovation, Product Liability Counsel, FCA, Chamber of Commerce, et al., and Wisconsin Legislature)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-09-2022
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Lisa Lawless
Submit Date: 12-12-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 12-14-2022 IT IS ORDERED that all motions submitted for leave to file non-party briefs amici curiae are granted; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefs submitted with the accompanying motions are accepted as filed; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for admission of non-resident Attorneys Brandon L. Boxler, Ian K. Edwards, and Fred J. Fresard are granted. A copy of SCR 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party's order; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as this case has been accepted into the Supreme Court eFiling pilot project, all attorneys must each opt in to the appellate court electronic filing system for this case. All attorneys who are not already opted in for this case are hereby ordered to do so within thirty days of the date of this order. Motion Response Filed By: Jesse Blocher Submit Date: 12-12-2022 Comment: Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc. (PLAC) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-09-2022
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Cover Letter to Motions for Pro Hac Vice and Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief (FCA US LLC)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-09-2022
|
Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
|
|
|
Filed By: Douglas Poland
Submit Date: 12-12-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 12-14-2022 IT IS ORDERED that all motions submitted for leave to file non-party briefs amici curiae are granted; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefs submitted with the accompanying motions are accepted as filed; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for admission of non-resident Attorneys Brandon L. Boxler, Ian K. Edwards, and Fred J. Fresard are granted. A copy of SCR 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party'sorder; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as this case has been accepted into the Supreme Court eFiling pilot project, all attorneys must each opt in to the appellate court electronic filing system for this case. All attorneys who are not already opted in for this case are hereby ordered to do so within thirty days of the date of this order. Comment: Attorney Brandon L. Boxler (FCA US LLC) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-09-2022
|
Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
|
|
|
Filed By: Douglas Poland
Submit Date: 12-12-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 12-14-2022 IT IS ORDERED that all motions submitted for leave to file non-party briefs amici curiae are granted; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefs submitted with the accompanying motions are accepted as filed; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for admission of non-resident Attorneys Brandon L. Boxler, Ian K. Edwards, and Fred J. Fresard are granted. A copy of SCR 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party'sorder; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as this case has been accepted into the Supreme Court eFiling pilot project, all attorneys must each opt in to the appellate court electronic filing system for this case. All attorneys who are not already opted in for this case are hereby ordered to do so within thirty days of the date of this order. Comment: Attorney Ian K. Edwards (FCA US LLC) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-09-2022
|
Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
|
|
|
Filed By: Douglas Poland
Submit Date: 12-12-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 12-14-2022 IT IS ORDERED that all motions submitted for leave to file non-party briefs amici curiae are granted; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefs submitted with the accompanying motions are accepted as filed; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for admission of non-resident Attorneys Brandon L. Boxler, Ian K. Edwards, and Fred J. Fresard are granted. A copy of SCR 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party'sorder; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as this case has been accepted into the Supreme Court eFiling pilot project, all attorneys must each opt in to the appellate court electronic filing system for this case. All attorneys who are not already opted in for this case are hereby ordered to do so within thirty days of the date of this order. Comment: Attorney Fred J. Fresard (FCA US LLC) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-09-2022
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Cover Letter to Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief (Alliance for Automotive Innovation (AAI))
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-09-2022
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Kendall Harrison
Submit Date: 12-9-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 12-14-2022 IT IS ORDERED that all motions submitted for leave to file non-party briefs amici curiae are granted; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefs submitted with the accompanying motions are accepted as filed; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for admission of non-resident Attorneys Brandon L. Boxler, Ian K. Edwards, and Fred J. Fresard are granted. A copy of SCR 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party'sorder; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as this case has been accepted into the Supreme Court eFiling pilot project, all attorneys must each opt in to the appellate court electronic filing system for this case. All attorneys who are not already opted in for this case are hereby ordered to do so within thirty days of the date of this order. Motion Response Filed By: Jesse Blocher Submit Date: 12-12-2022 Comment: Alliance for Automotive Innovation (AAI); Response in Opposition to Motions to File Amicus/Non-Party Briefs (Alliance for Automoative Innovation, Product Liability Counsel, FCA, Chamber of Commerce, et al., and Wisconsin Legislature) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-09-2022
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Douglas Poland
Submit Date: 12-9-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 12-14-2022 IT IS ORDERED that all motions submitted for leave to file non-party briefs amici curiae are granted; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefs submitted with the accompanying motions are accepted as filed; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for admission of non-resident Attorneys Brandon L. Boxler, Ian K. Edwards, and Fred J. Fresard are granted. A copy of SCR 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party'sorder; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as this case has been accepted into the Supreme Court eFiling pilot project, all attorneys must each opt in to the appellate court electronic filing system for this case. All attorneys who are not already opted in for this case are hereby ordered to do so within thirty days of the date of this order. Motion Response Filed By: Jesse Blocher Submit Date: 12-12-2022 Comment: FCA US LLC; Response in Opposition to Motions to File Amicus/Non-Party Briefs (Alliance for Automoative Innovation, Product Liability Counsel, FCA, Chamber of Commerce, et al., and Wisconsin Legislature) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-09-2022
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Jessie Augustyn
Submit Date: 12-9-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 12-14-2022 IT IS ORDERED that all motions submitted for leave to file non-party briefs amici curiae are granted; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefs submitted with the accompanying motions are accepted as filed; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for admission of non-resident Attorneys Brandon L. Boxler, Ian K. Edwards, and Fred J. Fresard are granted. A copy of SCR 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party'sorder; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as this case has been accepted into the Supreme Court eFiling pilot project, all attorneys must each opt in to the appellate court electronic filing system for this case. All attorneys who are not already opted in for this case are hereby ordered to do so within thirty days of the date of this order. Motion Response Filed By: Jesse Blocher Submit Date: 12-12-2022 Comment: Wisconsin Legislature; Response in Opposition to Motions to File Amicus/Non-Party Briefs (Alliance for Automoative Innovation, Product Liability Counsel, FCA, Chamber of Commerce, et al., and Wisconsin Legislature) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-09-2022
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Attorney Jessie Austin for Senate Majority Leader and Steve Fawcett of the Wisconsin Assembly as Amicus
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-09-2022
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Cover Letter to Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, National Association of Manufacturers, Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-09-2022
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Misha Tseytlin
Submit Date: 12-9-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 12-14-2022 IT IS ORDERED that all motions submitted for leave to file non-party briefs amici curiae are granted; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefs submitted with the accompanying motions are accepted as filed; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for admission of non-resident Attorneys Brandon L. Boxler, Ian K. Edwards, and Fred J. Fresard are granted. A copy of SCR 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party'sorder; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as this case has been accepted into the Supreme Court eFiling pilot project, all attorneys must each opt in to the appellate court electronic filing system for this case. All attorneys who are not already opted in for this case are hereby ordered to do so within thirty days of the date of this order. Motion Response Filed By: Jesse Blocher Submit Date: 12-12-2022 Comment: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, National Association of Manufacturers, Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce; Response in Opposition to Motions to File Amicus/Non-Party Briefs (Alliance for Automoative Innovation, Product Liability Counsel, FCA, Chamber of Commerce, et al., and Wisconsin Legislature) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-09-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Response Brief in Opposition for Leave to File Amcius Brief; This document is rejected because the Supreme Court does not currently accept this type of document via eFiling. Physical copies of this Response have been provided and put on the case. No action necessary.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-09-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Response Brief in Opposition for Leave to File Amcius Brief; This document is rejected because the Supreme Court does not currently accept this type of document via eFiling. Physical copies of this Response have been provided and put on the case. No action necessary.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-09-2022
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Cover Letter to Response in Opposition to Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief (American Tort Reform Association)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-09-2022
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Cover Letter to Response in Opposition to Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief (Washington Legal Foundation)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-09-2022
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Cover Letter to Response to Petition for Review
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-09-2022
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Andrew Cook
Submit Date: 12-9-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 12-14-2022 IT IS ORDERED that all motions submitted for leave to file non-party briefs amici curiae are granted; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefs submitted with the accompanying motions are accepted as filed; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for admission of non-resident Attorneys Brandon L. Boxler, Ian K. Edwards, and Fred J. Fresard are granted. A copy of SCR 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party'sorder; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as this case has been accepted into the Supreme Court eFiling pilot project, all attorneys must each opt in to the appellate court electronic filing system for this case. All attorneys who are not already opted in for this case are hereby ordered to do so within thirty days of the date of this order. Motion Response Filed By: Jesse Blocher Submit Date: 12-9-2022 Comment: American Tort Reform Association; Response in Opposition to Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief (American Tort Reform Association) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-08-2022
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Cover Letter to Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief (Washington Legal Foundation)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-08-2022
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Matthew Fernholz
Submit Date: 12-8-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 12-14-2022 IT IS ORDERED that all motions submitted for leave to file non-party briefs amici curiae are granted; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefs submitted with the accompanying motions are accepted as filed; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for admission of non-resident Attorneys Brandon L. Boxler, Ian K. Edwards, and Fred J. Fresard are granted. A copy of SCR 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party'sorder; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as this case has been accepted into the Supreme Court eFiling pilot project, all attorneys must each opt in to the appellate court electronic filing system for this case. All attorneys who are not already opted in for this case are hereby ordered to do so within thirty days of the date of this order. Motion Response Filed By: Jesse Blocher Submit Date: 12-9-2022 Comment: Washington Legal Foundation; Response in Opposition to Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief (Washington Legal Foundation) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-30-2022
|
Cites
|
|
|
405 Wis. 2d 481
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-30-2022
|
Cites
|
|
|
983 N.W.2d 1
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-30-2022
|
Opinion Ordered Published
|
|
|
Comment: Opinion Ordered Published - Order; Opinion Ordered Published - Decision
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-30-2022
|
Public Domain Citation
|
|
|
Comment: PDC No: 2022 WI App 56
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-28-2022
|
Fee Paid
|
|
|
Comment: Receipt No: 22R 002683
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-25-2022
|
Petition for Review
Reply Brief in Support of Petition for Review Combined Response to Briefs of Amicus Curiae in Support of Petition for Review Brief of Amicus Curiae (Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc. (PLAC)) in Support of Petition for Review Brief of Amicus Curiae (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, the National Association of Manufacturers, and Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce) in Support of Petition for Review Brief of Amicus Curiae (FCA US LLC) in Support of Petition for Review Brief of Amicus Curiae (Wisconsin Legislature) in Support of Petition for Review Brief of Amicus Curiae (Alliance for Automotive Innovation (AAI)) in Support of Petition for Review Brief of Amicus Curiae (American Tort Reform Association) in Support of Petition for Review Brief of Amicus Curiae (Washington Legal Foundation) in Support of Petition for Review Response to Petition for Review Petition for Review |
|
|
Filed By: Ryan Walsh
Submit Date: 12-9-2022 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 2-21-2023 IT IS ORDERED that the petition for review is denied, with $50.00 costs. ANNETTE KINGSLAND ZIEGLER, C.J., and REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J., dissent. Motion Response Filed By: Susan Tyndall Submit Date: 12-9-2022 Motion Response Filed By: Jesse Blocher Submit Date: 12-20-2022 Motion Response Filed By: Ryan Walsh Submit Date: 12-20-2022 Comment: Petition for Review and Appendix; Response to Petition for Review; Briefs of Amicus Curiae in Support of Petition for Review from Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc. (PLAC), Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, the National Association of Manufacturers, and Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce, FCA US LLC, Wisconsin Legislature, Alliance for Automotive Innovation (AAI), American Tort Reform Association, and Washington Legal Foundation |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-16-2022
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Attorney Ryan J. Walsh for the Appellants
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-26-2022
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Gundrum, Neubauer, Gill
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Affirmed Pages: 60 Written by: Neubauer, Lisa S. Order Text: Judgment affirmed. Comment: Opinion/Decision |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-31-2022
|
Submitted on Briefs
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-18-2022
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Returned Mail; Attorneys Anzelmo's, Lawless', and LoCoco's 1/10/22 order returned; 1/18/22 - forwarded to updated address.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-14-2022
|
Attorney address updated
|
|
|
Comment: Address changed for attorney: 34960 Christine Marie Rice
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-11-2022
|
Record and Briefs Sent to District 2
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-10-2022
|
Brief & Appx of Appellant(s)
Corrected Opening Brief of Defendants-Appellants |
|
|
Filed By: Patrick Nolan
Comment: Corrected Brief and Supplemental Appendix per 1/10/22 Court Order |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-10-2022
|
||
|
Filed By: Jesse Blocher
Comment: Respondents' Brief in Response to Non-Party Briefs |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-10-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Brief; Brief rejected per attorney's request.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-10-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: This document is rejected because the certification contains language about an appendix, but no appendix was filed. Please e-file an appendix as a separate document or remove the appendix language from the certificate.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-10-2022
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Returned Mail; Attorneys Anzelmo's, Lawless's, and LoCoco's Copy of 01-03-2022 Order Returned; 01-10-2022- Forwarded to updated address
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-10-2022
|
Reply Brief
Reply Brief |
|
|
Filed By: Patrick Nolan
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-07-2022
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Jesse Blocher
Submit Date: 1-10-2022 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 1-10-2022 ORD that the corrected appellants' brief and appendix are accepted for filing. FRO that the respondents' Brief in Response to Non-Party Briefs is accepted for filing. Comment: Motion to Permit Response to Non-Party Briefs of AAI and PLAC |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-06-2022
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Patrick Nolan
Submit Date: 1-6-2022 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 1-10-2022 ORD that the corrected appellants' brief and appendix are accepted for filing. FRO that the respondents' Brief in Response to Non-Party Briefs is accepted for filing. Comment: Motion for Leave to File Corrected BAP |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-03-2022
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae
Nonparty Brief Of The Chamber And WMC |
|
|
Filed By: Misha Tseytlin
Comment: The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-03-2022
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae
Brief of Amicus Curiae Alliance for Automotive Innovation (AAI) |
|
|
Filed By: Kendall Harrison
Comment: Alliance for Automotive Innovation |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-03-2022
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae
Amicus Curiae Brief of Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc. |
|
|
Filed By: Lisa Lawless
Comment: Product Liability Advisory Council |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-30-2021
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Lisa Lawless
Submit Date: 12-30-2021 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 1-3-2022 From Footnote 1: The PLAC also moves for leave to file a reply in support of its motion. We deny that request as unnecessary. Motion Response Filed By: Susan Tyndall Submit Date: 1-3-2022 Comment: Motion for Leave of Product Liability Advisory Council to file Reply in Support of Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-27-2021
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Lisa Lawless
Submit Date: 12-27-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-3-2022 ORD that the motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief is granted. Motion Response Filed By: Susan Tyndall Submit Date: 12-28-2021 Comment: Product Liability Advisory Council |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-27-2021
|
Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
|
|
|
Filed By: Lisa Lawless
Submit Date: 12-27-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-3-2022 ORD that the motion to allow Attorney Wendy F. Lumish to appear pro hac vice for Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc. is granted. FRO that sponsoring counsel, in this case Attorney Lisa M. Lawless, must sign every document which is filed in this court. Comment: Attorney Wendy Lumish |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-23-2021
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Kendall Harrison
Submit Date: 12-27-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-3-2022 ORD that the motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief is granted. Motion Response Filed By: Susan Tyndall Submit Date: 12-27-2021 Comment: Alliance for Automotive Innovation |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-23-2021
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Misha Tseytlin
Submit Date: 12-27-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-3-2022 ORD that the motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief is granted. Motion Response Filed By: Susan Tyndall Submit Date: 1-3-2022 Comment: The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-13-2021
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Patrick Nolan
Submit Date: 12-14-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 12-16-2021 ORD that the time for the appellants to file a reply brief is extended to January 7, 2022. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.82(2)(a). Motion Response Filed By: Patrick Nolan Submit Date: 12-14-2021 See BRY event due on 1-7-2022 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-10-2021
|
Brief of Respondent(s)
Brief of Respondent |
|
|
Filed By: Susan Tyndall
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-10-2021
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Patrick Nolan
Submit Date: 11-10-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 11-12-2021 ORD that the time for the appellants to file an appellants' brief is extended to November 10, 2021. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.82(2)(a). Comment: Motion to Extend Time to file Appellant's Brief |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-10-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Brief of Appellant; This document was uploaded in error. No further action is required. The appellant's brief has been accepted by the clerk's office.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-10-2021
|
Brief & Appx of Appellant(s)
STRICKEN - Brief of Appellants |
|
|
Filed By: Patrick Nolan
Comment: STRICKEN - CORRECTED BRIEF ACCEPTED PER 1/10/22 CTO |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-09-2021
|
Non-Electronic Record Item
|
|
|
Comment: Exhibit #709, Exhibit #710, Exhibit #713
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-02-2021
|
Supplement to Record
|
|
|
Comment: 1784-1 to 1789-1, Electronically filed with some non-electronic items
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-21-2021
|
Motion to Waive Filing Requirements
|
|
|
Filed By: Patrick Nolan
Submit Date: 10-21-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 10-22-2021 ORD that the appellant's motion to supplement the record is granted. Within ten days of the date of this order, the clerk of the circuit court shall transmit the materials described above to the clerk of the court of appeals as part of a supplemental return to the record. FRO that the time for the appellant's to file their brief and appendix is extended to five days after the filing of the supplemental return. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.82(2)(a). FRO that the court will accept the appellant's appendix in multiple sub-parts. Comment: Motion to file Appendix in Multiple Parts |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-21-2021
|
Motion to Correct/Supplement Record
|
|
|
Filed By: Patrick Nolan
Submit Date: 10-21-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 10-22-2021 ORD that the appellant's motion to supplement the record is granted. Within ten days of the date of this order, the clerk of the circuit court shall transmit the materials described above to the clerk of the court of appeals as part of a supplemental return to the record. FRO that the time for the appellant's to file their brief and appendix is extended to five days after the filing of the supplemental return. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.82(2)(a). FRO that the court will accept the appellant's appendix in multiple sub-parts. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-17-2021
|
Motion to Waive Filing Requirements
|
|
|
Filed By: Patrick Nolan
Submit Date: 9-20-2021 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 9-23-2021 ORD that the appellant's motion to enlarge the appellant's brief is denied. FRO that the appellant's brief shall be filed no later than October 27, 2021. Motion Response Filed By: Susan Tyndall Submit Date: 9-20-2021 Motion Response Filed By: Patrick Nolan Submit Date: 9-23-2021 Comment: Motion to Enlarge Word Limit for BAP |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-14-2021
|
Non-Electronic Record Item
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-10-2021
|
Sealed Documents
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-10-2021
|
Record
|
|
|
Comment: 1-14 to 1783-2 ELECTRONICALLY FILED
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-13-2021
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Samuel Christensen
Submit Date: 8-13-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 8-20-2021 IT IS ORDERED that the time for the clerk to file the record in this case is extended to September 10, 2021. WIS. STAT. RULES 809.15(4)(a) and 809.82(2)(a) (2019-20). See REC event due on 9-10-2021 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-12-2021
|
Attorney Change
|
|
|
Comment: Attorney Danella withdrawn per notice of withdrawal
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-15-2021
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Samuel Christensen
Submit Date: 7-15-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 7-20-2021 ORD that the time for the clerk to file the record in this case is extended to August 20, 2021. WIS. STAT. RULES 809.15(4)(a) and 809.82(2)(a) (2019-20). See REC event due on 8-20-2021 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-06-2021
|
Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
|
|
|
Filed By: Patrick Nolan
Submit Date: 7-7-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 7-12-2021 ORD that the motion to allow Attorney Matthew H. Lembke to appear pro hac vice for the appellants is granted. FRO that sponsoring counsel, in this case Attorney Patrick S. Nolan, must sign every document which is filed in this court. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-16-2021
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Samuel Christensen
Submit Date: 6-16-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 6-18-2021 ORD that the time for the clerk to file the record in this case is extended to July 19, 2021. WIS. STAT. RULES 809.15(4)(a) and 809.82(2)(a). See REC event due on 7-19-2021 Comment: 2nd Motion to Extend Time to file Record |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-07-2021
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Samuel Christensen
Submit Date: 5-7-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 5-10-2021 ORD that the time for the clerk to file the record in this case is extended to June 18, 2021. WIS. STAT. RULES 809.15(4)(a) and 809.82(2)(a) (2019-20). See REC event due on 6-18-2021 Comment: Motion to Extend Time (REC) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-21-2021
|
Sua Sponte
|
|
|
Filed By: Unassigned District 2
Submit Date: 4-21-2021 Decision: (N) No Action Decision Date: 4-21-2021 No action. Comment: Pursue CR sanction per 11/24/20 CTO? |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-21-2021
|
Transcript filed in Circuit Court
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-21-2021
|
Invoice Issued
|
|
|
Comment: Invoice No: 19648
VOIDED on 4-21-2021 - Will not pursue sanction fee per Court.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-21-2021
|
Court Reporter's Statement-Trans.
|
|
|
Court Reporter Name: (Browne, Brande)
Comment: Filed by DCA Moore; advising final trans. filed 4/21/21 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-06-2021
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by DCA Moore; Court Reporter Statement on Transcript indicating 1/7/20, 1/8/20, and 4/24/20 transcripts were filed 4/5/21
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-30-2021
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by DCA Moore; Court Reporter Statement on Transcript indicating 1/21/20 and 2/6/20 transcripts filed 3/26/21
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-17-2021
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by DCA Moore; Court Reporter Statement on Transcript indicating 2/10/20 and 2/11/20 transcripts filed 3/16/20
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-15-2021
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by DCA Moore; Court Reporter Statement on Transcript indicating 1/27/20 and 1/28/20 transcripts have been filed
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-08-2021
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by DCA Moore; Court Reporter Statement on Transcript indicating 1/23/20, 1/24/20, and 1/30/20 transcripts were filed 3/5/20 and 3/8/20.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-05-2021
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by DCA Moore; Court Reporter Statement on Transcript indicating 1/22/20, 2/3/20, and 2/4/20 transcripts were filed 3/4/20.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-03-2021
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by DCA Moore; Court Reporter Statement on Transcript indicating 1/22/20, 1/31/20, 2/5/20, 2/7/20, and 2/12/20 transcripts were filed 3/1/21 and 3/2/21
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-23-2021
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by Attorney Timothy Trecek; Copy of letter and transcripts to Moor, Judge Gasiorkiewicz, and Christensen 2/23/21 copy of letter from Attorney Trecek
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-16-2021
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by DCA Moore; Copy of Response to Open Records Request
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-05-2021
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by Attorney Trecek; Copy of letter to DCA Moore, Judge Gasiorkiewicz, and Clerk Christensen in response to open records act request
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-05-2021
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by Attorney Nolan; Open Records Act Request to Judge Gasiorkiewicz, DCA Moore, and T.C. Clerk; 2/10/21 - duplicate filed by mail
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-05-2021
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Copy of Letter From DCA Moore to Attorney Nolan; in response to open records request
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-02-2021
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by Attorney Nolan; Copy of Letter to DCA Moore and Judge Gasiorkiewicz re Transcripts
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-02-2021
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by DCA Moore; Copy of Letter to Attorneys re Transcripts/Attorneys' Concerns
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-02-2021
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by Attorney Trecek; Copy of Letter to DCA Moore and Judge Gasiorkiewicz re Transcripts
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-01-2021
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by Attorney Nolan; Copy of Letter to DCA Moore re Transcripts; 2/5/21 - duplicate filed by mail
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-01-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Letter to Moore re Transcript; The efiled letter is rejected as there is no statutory provision for the acceptance of this type of efiled document. This appeal is not currently a part of the electronic filing pilot program and all documents must be filed by traditional methods. If you would like to have the appeal converted to an electronic appeal so that documents can be submitted electronically, you must submit a written request asking that the appeal be converted to an electronic appeal. For more information regarding the pilot program, please see the Court's website. If you have not already done so, you may want to consider sending a copy of this letter to the Clerk's Office by traditional methods.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-28-2021
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Copy of Letter from DCA to Parties re Substitute CR
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-12-2020
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: From Circuit Court Clerk Samuel Christensen; Notifying appellate court that transcripts have not been filed from court reporter Brande Browne
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-03-2020
|
Delinquency Motion
|
|
|
Filed By: Unassigned District 2
Submit Date: 11-3-2020 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 11-24-2020 ORD that court reporter Brande Browne is sanctioned $1,075 for the failure to comply with the orders of this court. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.83(2). We will entertain a motion by Browne for reduction of the sanction if the transcripts are filed with the court by December 15, 2020. If they are not, we may impose additional sanctions. See CRS event due on 10-27-2020 Comment: 11/24/20 Court Order |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-08-2020
|
Delinquency Motion
|
|
|
Filed By: Unassigned District 2
Submit Date: 10-8-2020 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 10-12-2020 ORD that court reporter Brande Browne shall file and serve the overdue transcripts by October 27, 2020. The court reporter shall file a notice with this court that the transcripts have been filed and served. If the transcripts are not filed, a per diem penalty of $25 will be imposed for each day the transcripts are not filed, retroactive to the date of this order. Additionally the court reporter may be ordered to appear before the court to show cause as to why further sanctions should not be imposed under WIS. STAT. RULES 809.11(7)(d) and 809.83(2). See CRS event due on 10-1-2020 Comment: 10/12/20 Court Order |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-14-2020
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Brande Browne
Submit Date: 9-14-2020 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 9-16-2020 ORD that the time for filing the transcript(s) in this case is extended to October 1, 2020. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.11(7) (2017-18). The time for the clerk of courts to transmit the record is extended accordingly. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.15(4). See CRS event due on 10-1-2020 Comment: 2nd Motion to Extend Time to file CRS; 9/16/20 Court Order |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-17-2020
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Brande Browne
Submit Date: 8-17-2020 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 8-19-2020 ORD that the time for filing the transcripts in this case is extended to September 17, 2020. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.11(7)(c). See CRS event due on 9-17-2020 Comment: Motion to Extend Time to file transcripts; 8/19/20 Court Order re Motion to Extend Time |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-11-2020
|
Delinquent
|
|
|
Comment: New due date of connected CRS: 8-18-2020; Delinquent CRS
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-07-2020
|
Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
|
|
|
Filed By: Patrick Nolan
Submit Date: 8-10-2020 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 9-3-2020 ORD ORD that the motion to correct the caption is granted in part and denied in part. FRO that the motion to direct the circuit court to correct the judgment is denied. FRO that Attorney Nicholas Danella may appear in this court as counsel for the appellants. SCR 10.03(4). FRO that Wisconsin counsel must sign every document filed in this court. Comment: Motion for Pro Hac Vice status |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-05-2020
|
Attorney Change
|
|
|
Comment: Susan Tyndall and Jesse Blocher for plaintiff-respondent
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-23-2020
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Patrick Nolan
Submit Date: 7-29-2020 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 9-3-2020 ORD that the motion to correct the caption is granted in part and denied in part. FRO that the motion to direct the circuit court to correct the judgment is denied. FRO that Attorney Nicholas Danella may appear in this court as counsel for the appellants. SCR 10.03(4). FRO that Wisconsin counsel must sign every document filed in this court. Comment: motion improperly signed; Improperly Signed Motion to amend Caption and for Order to Correct Circuit Court Judgment; 7/29/20 - signed copy filed |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-07-2020
|
Statement on Transcript
|
|
|
Filed By: Patrick Nolan
Status: Ordered Comment: 6/18/20 - defective SRT filed, not certified by court reporter; 7/7/20 - properly signed SRT filed |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-30-2020
|
Case to proceed under RAP
|
|
|
Comment: Case to proceed under RAP Case to proceed under RAP
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-22-2020
|
Notif. Sent-Filing of NAP & Ct. Record
|
|
|
Comment: Notif. Sent-Filing of NAP & Ct. Record
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-22-2020
|
Fee Paid
|
|
|
Comment: Receipt No: 20R 001201
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-22-2020
|
Docketing Statement Submitted
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-22-2020
|
Notice of Appeal & Court Record
|
|
|
Comment: Notice of Appeal & Court Record
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-18-2020
|
Docketing Statement from Appellant
|
|
|
Comment: Docketing Statement from Appellant Docketing Statement from Appellant - Appendix
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-17-2020
|
Notice of Appeal filed in Cir. Ct.
|
|
|
Comment: Copy of Notice of Appeal with Cover Letter
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-13-2020
|
Judgment of Circuit Court
|
|