County of Buffalo v. Kevin J. Rich
Appeal Number 2020AP001526
Court of Appeals District 3
CASE HISTORY
|
Status
|
Court
|
Filing Date
|
Anticipated Due Date
|
Activity
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-27-2022
|
Cites
|
|
|
404 Wis. 2d 326
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-27-2022
|
Cites
|
|
|
978 N.W.2d 397
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-27-2022
|
Opinion Ordered Unpublished
|
|
|
Comment: Opinion Ordered Unpublished - Order
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-13-2022
|
Remittitur
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-20-2022
|
Errata Issued
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-07-2022
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Stark
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Affirmed Pages: 12 Order Text: Order affirmed. ERRATA ISSUED June 20, 2022. Comment: Opinion/Decision (corrected version) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-15-2021
|
Submitted on Briefs
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-13-2021
|
Record and Briefs Sent to District 3
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-12-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: This document is being rejected as it is a duplicate document. No further action required.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-12-2021
|
Reply Brief
Reply Brief of Appellant |
|
|
Filed By: Adam Nero
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-25-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The e-filed appendix is being rejected for the following reasons:
1. The appendix lists an incorrect case caption on the appendix cover.
2. The signature on the appendix cannot be accepted as filed. Electronic signatures must say "electronically signed by," followed by the person's name. The /s/ signature and scanned signatures are not acceptable.
3. The appendix does not contain the appendix certification as to content pursuant to Rule 809.19(2)(b).
Please e-file a corrected appendix.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-25-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The e-filed respondents brief is being rejected for the following reasons:
1. The brief lists an incorrect case caption on the brief cover.
2. The brief contains pagination errors.
3. The signature on the brief cannot be accepted as filed. Electronic signatures must say "electronically signed by," followed by the person's name. The /s/ signature and scanned signatures are not acceptable.
4. The brief is missing the e-filing pilot program certification found at this link: https://www.wicourts.gov/ecourts/efileappellate/faq.htm. The brief needs to contain both the certification found at the link and form and length certification pursuant to Rule 809.19(8)(d).
Please e-file a corrected brief.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-25-2021
|
Brief of Respondent(s)
Brief of Plaintiff-Respondent |
|
|
Filed By: Thomas Bilski
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-07-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The electronic version of the "Correspondence re: extension of brief filing deadline" is rejected because a hardcopy version of the document was received at the clerk's office and submitted to the court for decision prior to the upload of the electronic version.
**Please note that if a case is participating in the e-filing pilot program, and you are opted in as an electronic filer, you should not send hardcopies of your filings to the Clerk of Court of Appeals.**
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-07-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The electronic version of the Motion for Extension of Time to file Plaintiff-Respondent's Appellate Brief is rejected because a hardcopy version of the motion was received at the clerk's office and submitted to the court for decision prior to the upload of the electronic version.
**Please note that if a case is participating in the e-filing pilot program, and you are opted in as an electronic filer, you should not send hardcopies of your filings to the Clerk of Court of Appeals.**
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-07-2021
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Thomas Bilski
Submit Date: 5-7-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 5-10-2021 IT IS ORDERED that the time for filing the respondent's brief is extended to June 28, 2021. See BRS event due on 6-28-2021 Comment: duplicate rec'd 5/10/21 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-12-2021
|
Brief & Appx of Appellant(s)
Brief of Appellant |
|
|
Filed By: Adam Nero
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-09-2021
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Adam Nero
Submit Date: 4-12-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 4-12-2021 IT IS ORDERED that the time for filing the appellant's brief is extended to April 19, 2021. See BAP event due on 4-19-2021 Comment: 4th Request |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-09-2021
|
Delinquent
|
|
|
Comment: New due date of connected BAP: 4-16-2021
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-01-2021
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Adam Nero
Submit Date: 3-2-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 3-3-2021 IT IS ORDERED that the time for filing the appellant's brief is extended to March 30, 2021. See BAP event due on 3-30-2021 Comment: 3rd request |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-14-2021
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Adam Nero
Submit Date: 1-15-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-19-2021 IT IS ORDERED that the time for filing the appellant's brief is extended to March 1, 2021. See BAP event due on 3-1-2021 Comment: 2nd request |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-15-2020
|
Attorney address updated
|
|
|
Comment: Address changed for attorney: 41590 Adam Sticht
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-30-2020
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Adam Nero
Submit Date: 12-1-2020 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 12-4-2020 IT IS ORDERED that the time for filing the appellant's brief is extended to January 14, 2021. See BAP event due on 1-4-2021 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-21-2020
|
Record
|
|
|
Comment: 1-1 to 127-1, ELECTRONICALLY FILED Record Filing Notice
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-22-2020
|
Statement on Transcript
|
|
|
Filed By: Adam Nero
Status: Prev. Filed |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-15-2020
|
Notif. Sent-Filing of NAP & Ct. Record
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-15-2020
|
Fee Paid
|
|
|
Comment: Receipt No: 20R 001806
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-15-2020
|
Notice of Appeal & Court Record
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-11-2020
|
Docketing Statement from Appellant
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-08-2020
|
Notice of Appeal filed in Cir. Ct.
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-01-2020
|
Order of Circuit Court
|
|