Democratic National Committee v. Bostelmann

Appeal Number 2020AP001634 - CQ

Supreme Court

CASE HISTORY
Status
Court
Filing Date
Anticipated Due Date
Activity
OCCD
SC
12-07-2020
Remittitur
Comment: T/J to T.C.

OCCD
SC
10-13-2020
Letter/Correspondence
Comment: CTO of October 5, 2020 returned by USPS from Attorney Urban's address: Return to Sender, Not Deliverable As Addressed, Unable to Forward. Placed in file.

OCCD
SC
10-06-2020
Cites
394 Wis. 2d 33

OCCD
SC
10-06-2020
Cites
949 N.W.2d 423

OCCD
SC
10-06-2020
Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
Filed By: Sopen Shah
Submit Date: 10-6-2020
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 10-6-2020
ORD that the motion for pro hac vice status is granted.
Comment: John M. Devaney and Zachary Newkirk Motion for Pro Hac Vice Order

OCCD
SC
10-06-2020
Judge Panel: Roggensack, Bradley, Ziegler, Bradley, Dallet, Hagedorn, Karofsky
Opinion: Opinion
Decision: Certif. Grtd. by Sup. Ct. Pages: 11
Written by: Hagedorn, Brian K.
Dallet, Rebecca F. Wrote Dissenting Opinion 10 pages.
Bradley, Ann Walsh Joined Dissenting Opinion
Karofsky, Jill Joined Dissenting Opinion
Order Text: Certified question answered and cause remanded to 7th Circuit. HAGEDORN, J., delivered the majority opinion of the Court, in which ROGGENSACK, C.J., ZIEGLER, and REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, JJ., joined. DALLET, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which ANN WALSH BRADLEY and KAROFSKY, JJ., joined.
Comment: Opinion/Decision

OCCD
SC
10-06-2020
Public Domain Citation
Comment: PDC No: 2020 WI 80

OCCD
SC
10-06-2020
Additional Authorities
Comment: Supplemental Authority Letter - filed by Attorney Tseytlin

OCCD
SC
10-05-2020
Other Brief
Comment: Plaintiffs-Appellees' Response Brief

OCCD
SC
10-05-2020
Other Brief
Comment: The Legislatures Response Brief

OCCD
SC
10-05-2020
Brief of Amicus Curiae
Amicus Brief - SEIU
Filed By: Kyle McCoy
Comment: SEIU

OCCD
SC
10-05-2020
Brief of Amicus Curiae
Amicus Brief - Tony Evers
Filed By: Lester Pines
Comment: Tony Evers

OCCD
SC
10-05-2020
Filed By: Luke Berg
Comment: Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty

OCCD
SC
10-05-2020
Brief of Amicus Curiae
Amicus Brief - AG
Filed By: Colin Roth
Comment: Attorney General with Appendix

OCCD
SC
10-05-2020
Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
Filed By: Kyle McCoy
Submit Date: 10-5-2020
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 10-6-2020
ORD that the motion for pro hac vice status is granted.
Comment: Matthew Wessler (SEIU)

OCCD
SC
10-05-2020
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Filed By: Kyle McCoy
Submit Date: 10-5-2020
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 10-5-2020
IT IS ORDERED that the motions are granted and the briefs are accepted for filing.
Comment: SEIU

OCCD
SC
10-05-2020
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Filed By: Colin Roth
Submit Date: 10-5-2020
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 10-5-2020
IT IS ORDERED that the motions are granted and the briefs are accepted for filing.
Comment: Attorney General

OCCD
SC
10-05-2020
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Filed By: Lester Pines
Submit Date: 10-5-2020
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 10-5-2020
IT IS ORDERED that the motions are granted and the briefs are accepted for filing.
Comment: Tony Evers

OCCD
SC
10-05-2020
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Filed By: Luke Berg
Submit Date: 10-5-2020
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 10-5-2020
IT IS ORDERED that the motions are granted and the briefs are accepted for filing.
Comment: Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty

OCCD
SC
10-05-2020
Comment: Plaintiffs-Appellees Brief with Appendix (corrected pages rec'd 10/6/2020- service list)

OCCD
SC
10-05-2020
Other Brief
Comment: Separate Appendix. The Wisconsin State Legislature.

OCCD
SC
10-02-2020
Court Order
Part I

ORD that the certification is granted and the appeal is accepted. The court reserves the right to later formulate the question certified and to determine the scope of its inquiry; and FRO that the parties shall file simultaneous principal briefs by 9:00 a.m. on Monday, October 5, 2020, and simultaneous response briefs by 3:00 p.m. on Monday, October 5, 2020. The parties shall file each brief as an attachment in pdf format to an email addressed to clerk@wicourts.gov. As soon as possible after the filing of each brief via email, the parties shall also deliver a paper original and 12 paper copies of the brief to the clerk of this court with the following notation on the top of the first page: "This document was previously filed via email."; and FRO that the briefs shall follow the pertinent requirements of Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.19; and
Comment: Court Order

OCCD
SC
10-02-2020
Court Order
Part II

FRO that any non-party that wishes to file a brief as an amicus curiae must file a motion for leave of the court to file a non-party brief pursuant to the requirements of Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.19(7). Non-parties should also consult this courts Internal Operating Procedure III.B.6.c. concerning the nature of non-parties who may be granted leave to file a non-party brief. A proposed non-party brief must accompany the motion for leave to file it. Any proposed non-party brief shall be limited to the certified question, and it shall not exceed 20 pages if a monospaced font is used or 4,400 words if a proportional serif font is used. Any motion for leave with the proposed non-party brief attached shall be filed no later than 12:00 p.m. on Monday, October 5, 2020. Any such motion and proposed brief shall be filed as attachments in pdf format to an email addressed to clerk@wicourts.gov. Any submission by a non-party that does not comply with Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.19(7) and any proposed non-party brief for which this court does not grant leave will not be considered by the court; and FRO that, in light of the time constraints set forth in the order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, this court will render a decision in this matter based on the written briefs of the parties without oral argument.

OCCD
SC
10-02-2020
Certified Question of Law

Submit Date: 10-2-2020
Decision: (O) Other
Decision Date: 10-6-2020
Certified question answered and cause remanded to 7th Circuit. HAGEDORN, J., delivered the majority opinion of the Court, in which ROGGENSACK, C.J., ZIEGLER, and REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, JJ., joined. DALLET, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which ANN WALSH BRADLEY and KAROFSKY, JJ., joined.
Comment: Certified Question of Law Certified Question of Law Opinion Public Docket 20-2835 Public Docket 20-2844