State v. James P. Killian
Appeal Number 2020AP002012 - CR
Supreme Court
CASE HISTORY
|
Status
|
Court
|
Filing Date
|
Anticipated Due Date
|
Activity
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-31-2023
|
Remittitur
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
06-21-2023
|
Cites
|
|
|
408 Wis. 2d 92
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
06-21-2023
|
Cites
|
|
|
991 N.W.2d 387
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
06-21-2023
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Roggensack, Bradley, Ziegler, Bradley, Dallet, Hagedorn, Karofsky
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Reversed and remanded Pages: 35 Written by: Ziegler, Annette K. Bradley, Ann Walsh Wrote Dissenting Opinion 15 pages. Bradley, Rebecca Grassl Joined Dissenting Opinion Order Text: The decision of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Comment: Opinion/Decision |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
06-20-2023
|
Public Domain Citation
|
|
|
Comment: PDC No: 2023 WI 52
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
04-17-2023
|
Oral Argument
|
|
|
Comment: at 1:30 p.m. (State Capitol SC Hearing Room). Kara L. Janson for Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner. Todd E. Schroeder for Defendant-Respondent.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-29-2023
|
Reply Brief-Supreme Court
Reply Brief-Supreme Court |
|
|
Filed By: Kara Janson
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-13-2023
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The Response Brief-Supreme Court is rejected as the brief's cover page lists an incomplete case caption.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-13-2023
|
Response Brief-Supreme Court
Response Brief-Supreme Court |
|
|
Filed By: Todd Schroeder
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
02-20-2023
|
First Brief-Supreme Court
First Brief - Supreme Court |
|
|
Filed By: Kara Janson
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-24-2023
|
Assigned-Oral Argument
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-20-2023
|
Caption Amended
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-20-2023
|
Court Changed to Supreme Court
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-14-2022
|
Final Publication
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-01-2022
|
Certificate of Service
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-01-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The electronic copy of the " Certificate of Service" is rejected because there is currently no statutory provision for the acceptance of this type of electronic document in the Supreme Court.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-01-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The electronic copy of the "Cover Letter to Clerk of Supreme Court" is rejected because there is currently no statutory provision for the acceptance of this type of electronic document in the Supreme Court.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-31-2022
|
Cites
|
|
|
979 N.W.2d 569
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-31-2022
|
Cites
|
|
|
404 Wis. 2d 451
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-31-2022
|
Opinion Ordered Published
|
|
|
Comment: Opinion Ordered Published - Order; Opinion Ordered Published - Decision
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-31-2022
|
Public Domain Citation
|
|
|
Comment: PDC No: 2022 WI App 43
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-17-2022
|
Fee Waived
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by State
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-17-2022
|
||
|
Filed By: Kara Janson
Submit Date: 9-1-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-20-2023 IT IS ORDERED that the petition for review is granted and that pursuant to Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.62(6), the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner may not raise or argue issues not set forth in the petition for review unless otherwise ordered by the court; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that as of the date of this order this case is now part of the Supreme Court eFiling pilot project. All attorneys who are not already opted into eFiling for this case are hereby ordered to do so within five days of the date of this order. Parties are reminded that all documents, including briefs, are now required to be eFiled; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Wis. Stat. (Rules) 809.62(6) and 809.63, within 30 days after the date of this order the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner must file a brief in this court; that within 20 days of filing the defendant-respondent, James P. Killian, must file either a brief or a statement that no brief will be filed; and that if a brief is filed by the defendant-respondent, within 10 days of filing the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner must file either a reply brief or a statement that no reply brief will be filed. No extensions will be permitted; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in any brief filed in this court the parties shall not incorporate by reference any portion of their court of appeals' brief or petition for review or response; instead, any material in these documents upon which there is reliance should be restated in the brief filed in this court; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the first brief filed in this court must contain, as part of the appendix, a copy of the decision of the court of appeals in this case; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if a party has not previously filed an electronic copy of the briefs filed on behalf of that party in the court of appeals, the party, within 30 days after the date of this order, must provide the clerk of this cour |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-26-2022
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-26-2022
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-19-2022
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Stark, Hruz, Gill
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Affirmed Pages: 29 Written by: Hruz, Thomas M. Order Text: Order affirmed Comment: Opinion/Decision |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-30-2021
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: AAG Muellenbach for AAG Rosenow
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-04-2021
|
Submitted on Briefs
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-12-2021
|
Record and Briefs Sent to District 3
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-11-2021
|
Reply Brief
Appellant's Reply Brief |
|
|
Filed By: Scott Rosenow
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-28-2021
|
Brief of Respondent(s)
Brief of Defendant-Respondent |
|
|
Filed By: Todd Schroeder
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-06-2021
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Todd Schroeder
Submit Date: 4-6-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 4-7-2021 IT IS ORDERED that the time for filing the respondent's brief is extended to April 28, 2021. See BRS event due on 4-28-2021 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-06-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The electronic version of the Defendant-Respondent's Motion to Enlarge Time for Filing Brief is rejected for improper electronic signature. Each signature line for the filing party/counsel in the document should read "Electronically signed by ______" followed by the filing party's/counsels name and other information, rather than contain a written or manufactured signature. Please upload a corrected electronic version of the document.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-09-2021
|
Brief & Appx of Appellant(s)
State's Brief-in-Chief |
|
|
Filed By: Scott Rosenow
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-28-2021
|
Sealed Documents
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-28-2021
|
Record
|
|
|
Comment: 1-3 to 85-1 ELECTRONICALLY FILED
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-22-2021
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Notice of Inspection of Record
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-13-2021
|
Delinquent
|
|
|
Comment: New due date of connected REC: 1-28-2021
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-09-2020
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Letter from AAG Rosenow re: e-filing pilot program
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-09-2020
|
Notif. Sent-Filing of NAP & Ct. Record
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-09-2020
|
Statement on Transcript
|
|
|
Filed By: Scott Rosenow
Status: Prev. Filed |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-08-2020
|
Fee Waived
|
|
|
Comment: Filed by State
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-08-2020
|
Notice of Appeal & Court Record
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-07-2020
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Letter re: AAG Rosenow assigned to matter, copy of NAP & copy of cc order
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-02-2020
|
Notice of Appeal filed in Cir. Ct.
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-22-2020
|
Order of Circuit Court
|
|