State v. A. M.-C.
Appeal Number 2021AP000094
CONFIDENTIAL
CONSOLIDATED -
List of Consolidated Cases
Court of Appeals District 1
CASE HISTORY
|
Status
|
Court
|
Filing Date
|
Anticipated Due Date
|
Activity
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-17-2021
|
Remittitur
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
06-01-2021
|
Response
|
|
|
Comment: Per 5/18/21 CTO - PRE w/ parent signature; Corrected PRE received 6/16/21 Court Order
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
05-18-2021
|
Court Order
|
|
|
IT IS ORDERED that counsel for respondent-appellant-petitioner shall, by June 1, 2021: (1) obtain A.M.-C.'s signature on the petition for review; (2) file the petition for review with A.M.-C.'s original signature, which document shall then be placed in the court's confidential file in this matter; (3) file ten copies of the petition for review, with A.M.-C.'s signature redacted; (4) file an electronic version of the petition for review, with A.M.-C.'s signature redacted; and (5) serve one copy of the petition for review, with A.M.-C.'s signature redacted, on opposing counsel. Failure to comply with these directives may result in the dismissal of the petition for review. See Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.83.
Comment: 5/18/21 Court Order |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-07-2021
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Letter response to PRE filed by the State
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-28-2021
|
Cites
|
|
|
397 Wis. 2d 245
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-28-2021
|
Cites
|
|
|
959 N.W.2d 98
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-28-2021
|
Opinion Ordered Unpublished
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
04-27-2021
|
Petition for Review
|
|
|
Filed By: Gregory Bates
Submit Date: 5-7-2021 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 6-16-2021 IT IS ORDERED that the petition for review is denied, without costs. Motion Response Filed By: Anne A Submit Date: 5-7-2021 Comment: Petition for Review Appendix |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-05-2021
|
Errata Issued
|
|
|
Comment: Errata and Opinion
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-30-2021
|
||
|
Judge Panel: White
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Affirmed Pages: 18 Order Text: Order affirmed Comment: ERRATA ISSUED |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-19-2021
|
Briefs Sent to District
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-18-2021
|
Reply Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Gregory Bates
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-12-2021
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-05-2021
|
Briefs Sent to District
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-05-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The respondent's e-filed brief is rejected for the following reasons:
1. The signature on the brief cannot be accepted as filed. Electronic signatures must say "electronically signed by," followed by the person's name. /s/ signature and scanned signatures are not acceptable.
2. The brief is missing the e-filing pilot program certification found at this link: https://www.wicourts.gov/ecourts/efileappellate/faq.htm. The brief needs to contain both the certification found at the link and form and length certification pursuant to Rule 809.19(8)(d).
Please e-file a corrected brief.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-05-2021
|
Brief of Respondent(s)
|
|
|
Filed By: Katie Gutowski
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-03-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Brief of Respondent - 2 copies of the respondent's brief were uploaded. In consolidated cases only 1 copy of the brief needs to be efiled under the lowest case number.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-03-2021
|
Briefs Sent to District
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-03-2021
|
Brief of Guardian ad Litem
|
|
|
Filed By: Anne A
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-02-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The e-filed brief is rejected for the following reasons:
1. The signature on the brief cannot be accepted as filed. Electronic signatures must say "electronically signed by," followed by the filing party's name. The /s/ signature and scanned signatures are not acceptable.
2. The brief is missing the e-filing pilot program certification found at this link: https://www.wicourts.gov/ecourts/efileappellate/faq.htm. The brief needs to contain both the form and length certification pursuant to Rule 809.19(8)(d) and the certification found at the link.
Please e-file a corrected brief.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-02-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Brief of Respondent - The brief is electronically filed with an incorrect document type and document name. It is filed using notice of appearance. Electronically refile the brief using document type and document name: BRIEF OF RESPONDENT. In consolidated cases documents only need to be filed once under the lowest appeal number.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-02-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Brief of Respondent - The brief is electronically filed with an incorrect document type and document name. It is filed using notice of appearance. Electronically refile the brief using document type and document name: BRIEF OF RESPONDENT. In consolidated cases documents only need to be filed once under the lowest appeal number.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-22-2021
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Anne A
Submit Date: 2-22-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 2-25-2021 IT IS ORDERED that the deadline for Attorney Abell to file her brief is extended to March 5, 2021. See BGL event due on 3-5-2021 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-15-2021
|
Record and Briefs Sent to District 1
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-15-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The appeallant's e-filed appendix is rejected because it is missing the e-filing pilot program certification found at this link: https://www.wicourts.gov/ecourts/efileappellate/faq.htm. The appendix needs to contain both the certification found at the link and the certification pursurant to Rule 809.19(2).
Please e-file a corrected appendix.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-15-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The appellant's e-filed brief is rejected for the following reasons:
1. There are pagination errors in the table of contents.
2. Electronic signatures must say "electronically signed by," followed by the filing party's name. The /s/ signature and scanned signatures are note acceptable.
Please e-file a corrected brief.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-15-2021
|
Brief & Appx of Appellant(s)
|
|
|
Filed By: Gregory Bates
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-10-2021
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Atty. Bates appears for the Respondent-Appellant, requests case be in the efiling pilot program
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-27-2021
|
Sealed Documents
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-27-2021
|
Record
|
|
|
Comment: 1-8 to 90-1 ELECTRONICALLY FILED
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-26-2021
|
Consolidated Case
|
|
|
Comment: [2021AP000094, 2021AP000095]
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-22-2021
|
Unconsolidated
|
|
|
Comment: [2021AP000094, 2021AP000095]
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-22-2021
|
Consolidated Case
|
|
|
Comment: [2021AP000094, 2021AP000095]
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-22-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Order uploaded in error
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-22-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: 1/21/21 Order
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-20-2021
|
Motion to Consolidate
|
|
|
Filed By: Gregory Bates
Submit Date: 1-20-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-21-2021 IT IS ORDERED that appeal Nos. 2021AP94 and 2021AP95 are consolidated for briefing and disposition purposes. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.10(3) (2017-18). Motion Response Filed By: Gregory Bates Submit Date: 3-5-2021 Comment: [2021AP000094, 2021AP000095] |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-20-2021
|
Statement on Transcript
|
|
|
Filed By: Gregory Bates
Status: Prev. Filed |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-19-2021
|
Notif. Sent-Filing of NAP & Ct. Record
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-19-2021
|
Termination of Parental Rights
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-19-2021
|
Notice of Appeal & Court Record
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-11-2021
|
Received SPD Appointment Order
|
|
|
Comment: Atty. Gregory Bates
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-11-2021
|
Notice of Appeal filed in Cir. Ct.
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-06-2020
|
Order of Circuit Court
|
|