OCCD

SC

02-19-2024

Letter/Correspondence
Letter of Governor Evers re signing of Senate Bill 488 and special or recall elections

Comment: Letter of Governor Evers re signing of Senate Bill 488 and special or recall elections

OCCD

SC

02-09-2024

Notice of Appearance
Notice of Appearance - Lenz (Intervenor-Petitioners Black Leaders Organizing For Communities, Voces De La Frontera, League Of Women Voters Of Wisconsin, Cindy Fallona, Lauren Stephenson, and Rebecca Alwin)

Comment: Lenz for Intervenor-Petitioners Black Leaders Organizing For Communities, Voces De La Frontera, League Of Women Voters Of Wisconsin, Cindy Fallona, Lauren Stephenson, and Rebecca Alwin

OCCD

SC

02-06-2024

Notice of Appearance
Notice of Appearance of Mel Barnes (Intervenor-Respondent Evers)

Comment: Barnes for Evers

OCCD

SC

02-01-2024

Letter/Correspondence
Letter From Atty Packard on Behalf of Senate Democratic Caucus re: non-participation in Motion for Relief

Comment: Letter From Atty Packard on Behalf of Senate Democratic Caucus re: non-participation in Motion for Relief

OCCD

SC

01-24-2024

Notice of Appearance

Comment: Notice of Appearance of Julie Zuckerbrod (Intervenors-Petitioners Lisa Hunter, Jacob Zabel and John Persa)

OCCD

SC

01-19-2024

Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Abha Khanna
Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Abha Khanna

Filed By: Diane Welsh
Submit Date: 1-19-2024
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 1-24-2024
IT IS ORDERED that the motions are granted. A copy of SCR 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, can be found at the following link: https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/rules/chap10.pdf. A copy of SCR 10.03(4) is also attached to the newly admitted pro hac vice attorneys' orders; and,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within five days of the date of this order, Attorneys Zuckerbrod and Khanna shall register for access to the Wisconsin appellate court electronic filing system and shall opt in as attorneys on this case. Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.801(3).
Comment: Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Abha Khanna

OCCD

SC

01-17-2024

Attorney Change
Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel for Lisa Hunter, Jacob Zabel and John Persa (Charles G. Curtis, Jr., John M. Devaney, Aria C. Branch, and Christina A. Ford)ohn Persa

Comment: Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel for Lisa Hunter, Jacob Zabel and John Persa (Charles G. Curtis, Jr., John M. Devaney, Aria C. Branch, and Christina A. Ford)

OCCD

SC

01-17-2024

Notice of Appearance
Notice of Appearance of Diane M. Welsh (Intervenors-Petitioners)

Comment: Notice of Appearance of Diane M. Welsh (Intervenors-Petitioners)

OCCD

SC

01-16-2024

Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Response of Wisconsin Legislature to Hunter Intervenors Motion for Relief from Judgment (01-29-24)
Response of Congressmen to Hunter Intervenors Motion for Relief from Judgment (01-29-24)
Response of Petitioners to Hunter Intervenors Motion for Relief from Judgment (01-29-24)
Response of Citizen Mathematicians to Motion for Relief from Judgment (01-29-24)
Motion of Intervenors-Petitioners Lisa Hunter et al for Relief from Judgement Pursuant to Wis. Stat. sec. 806.07
Memorandum in Support of Motion of Intervenors-Petitioners Lisa Hunter et al for Relief from Judgement Pursuant to Wis. Stat. sec. 806.07

Filed By: William Hancock
Submit Date: 1-17-2024
Decision: (D) Deny
Decision Date: 3-1-2024
IT IS ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a reply in support of the motion for relief from judgment is granted, and the proposed reply is accepted for filing; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that motion for relief from judgment is denied.

JANET C. PROTASIEWICZ, J., did not participate.
REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J. (concurring)
ANNETTE KINGSLAND ZIEGLER, C.J., (joined concurrance)
Motion Response
Filed By: Sarah Zylstra
Submit Date: 1-30-2024
Motion Response
Filed By: 34783 (St. John, Kevin)
Submit Date: 1-30-2024
Motion Response
Filed By: Misha Tseytlin
Submit Date: 1-30-2024
Comment: Motion of Intervenors-Petitioners Lisa Hunter et al for Relief from Judgement Pursuant to Wis. Stat. sec. 806.07 with Memorandum in Support

OCCD

SC

05-25-2022

Remittitur

OCCD

SC

04-15-2022

Cites

972 N.W.2d 559

OCCD

SC

04-15-2022

Public Domain Citation

Comment: PDC No: 2022 WI 19

OCCD

SC

03-31-2022

Motion to Correct/Supplement Record
Response to Governor's Motion to Supplement (Wisconsin Legislature)
04-01-2022 Court Order
Governor's Motion to Supplement Record

Filed By: Anthony Russomanno
Submit Date: 3-31-2022
Decision: (D) Deny
Decision Date: 4-1-2022
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is denied.
Comment: Governor's Motion to Supplement Record (WI Legislature Response to Governor's Motion to Supplement Record arrived as order was issuing)

OCCD

SC

03-25-2022

Letter/Correspondence
Response to Governor Letter on Remand (Bewley)

Comment: Senator Bewley Response Letter on Remand

OCCD

SC

03-24-2022

Letter/Correspondence
Response to Governor Letter on Remand (Wisconsin Legislature)

Comment: Wisconsin Legislature Response Letter on Remand

OCCD

SC

03-24-2022

Letter/Correspondence
Governor Letter on Remand

Comment: Governor Letter on Remand

OCCD

SC

03-23-2022

Additional Authorities
Additional Authoritity from SCOTUS 21A490

Comment: SCOTUS Order 21AP490 (Grothman v WEC application for stay presented to Justice Barrett and by her referred to the court is denied.)

OCCD

SC

03-16-2022

Additional Authorities
Additional Authorities file by "Congressmen" on 03-16-2022

Comment: Additional Authorities - "Congressmen" request to take notice of National Republican Redistricting Trust Amicus Brief filed 3/15/22 in the SCOTUS.

OCCD

SC

03-11-2022

Court Order
Order: 21AP1450-OA

IT IS ORDERED that any party that wishes to file a response to the Congressmens expedited motion for a stay pending appeal may submit a letter brief no later than 11:00 a.m. on March 14, 2022; Page 2 March 11, 2022 No. 2021AP1450-OA Johnson v. Wisconsin Elections Commission IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all filings in this matter shall be filed as an attachment in .pdf format to an email addressed to clerk@wicourts.gov. See Wis. Stat. 809.70, 809.80 and 809.81. A paper original and 10 copies of each filed document must be received by the clerk of this court by 12:00 noon of the business day following submission by email, with the document bearing the following notation on the top of the first page: "This document was previously filed via email"; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that requests for additional briefing or extensions will be viewed with disfavor.

Comment: March 11, 2022 Court Order

OCCD

SC

03-09-2022

Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
March 15, 2022 Court Order
Motion for Leave to File Reply Letter Brief (St. John)

Filed By: 34783 (St. John, Kevin)
Submit Date: 3-15-2022
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 3-15-2022
IT IS ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a reply is granted and the reply submitted with the motion is accepted for filing.

Justice Ann Walsh Bradley dissenting.
Motion Response
Filed By: 34783 (St. John, Kevin)
Submit Date: 3-15-2022
Comment: Motion to File Reply to MST (WI Leg) Responses

OCCD

SC

03-07-2022

Motion for Stay
Response to Congressmen Motion for Stay (Lisa Hunter et al.)
Exhibit 1 to Response to Congressmen Motion for Stay (Lisa Hunter et al)
Response to Congressmen Motion for Stay (Evers)
Response to Congressmen Motion for Stay (WEC)
Emergency Motion for Stay and to File Additional Maps (Congressmen)
Second Affidavit of Congressman Bryan Steil

Filed By: Kevin LeRoy
Submit Date: 3-7-2022
Decision: (D) Deny
Decision Date: 4-15-2022
IT IS ORDERED that the Wisconsin Legislature's March 4, 2022 emergency motion asking this court to stay its March 3, 2022 opinion is dismissed, as moot;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the March 7, 2022 expedited motion of Congressmen Glenn Grothman, Mike Gallagher, Bryan Steil, Tom Tiffany, and Scott Fitzgerald for a stay pending appeal is dismissed, as moot, and the accompanying request that we permit all parties to submit equipopulous, core-retention-maximization congressional maps is denied; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the March 23, 2022 motion of Congressmen Glenn Grothman, Mike Gallagher, Bryan Steil, Tom Tiffany, and Scott Fitzgerald for reconsideration of this court's March 3, 2022 opinion and order, and for an order permitting all parties to submit core-retention-maximization congressional maps is denied.
REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J. (dissenting). I dissent from the denial of that portion of the March 7, 2022 motion requesting permission for all parties to submit equipopulous, core-retention-maximization congressional maps and from the denial of the March 23, 2022 motion.
Motion Response
Filed By: John Devaney
Submit Date: 3-14-2022
Motion Response
Filed By: Anthony Russomanno
Submit Date: 3-14-2022
Motion Response
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 3-14-2022
Comment: Congressmen's emergency motion for stay and for parties to file add'l maps, w/ affidavit of Congressman Brian Steil

OCCD

SC

03-04-2022

Motion for Stay
Response to the Wisconsin Legislature's Motion for Stay (Hunter)
Response to the Wisconsin Legislature's Motion for Stay (WILL)
Response to the Wisconsin Legislature's Motion for Stay (BLOC)
Response to Wisconsin the Wisconsin Legislature's Motion for Stay (Evers)
Response to the Wisconsin Legislature's Motion for Stay (WEC)
Response to the Wisconsin Legislature's Motion for Stay (Bewley)
Cover Letter to Response to the Wisconsin Legislature's Motion for Stay (WILL)
Expedited Motion for Stay (Wisconsin Legislature)

Filed By: 34783 (St. John, Kevin)
Submit Date: 3-4-2022
Decision: (M) Dismiss
Decision Date: 4-15-2020
IT IS ORDERED that the Wisconsin Legislature's March 4, 2022 emergency motion asking this court to stay its March 3, 2022 opinion is dismissed, as moot;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the March 7, 2022 expedited motion of Congressmen Glenn Grothman, Mike Gallagher, Bryan Steil, Tom Tiffany, and Scott Fitzgerald for a stay pending appeal is dismissed, as moot, and the accompanying request that we permit all parties to submit equipopulous, core-retention-maximization congressional maps is denied; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the March 23, 2022 motion of Congressmen Glenn Grothman, Mike Gallagher, Bryan Steil, Tom Tiffany, and Scott Fitzgerald for reconsideration of this court's March 3, 2022 opinion and order, and for an order permitting all parties to submit core-retention-maximization congressional maps is denied.
REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J. (dissenting). I dissent from the denial of that portion of the March 7, 2022 motion requesting permission for all parties to submit equipopulous, core-retention-maximization congressional maps and from the denial of the March 23, 2022 motion.
Motion Response
Filed By: Charles Curtis
Submit Date: 3-9-2022
Motion Response
Filed By: Lucas Vebber
Submit Date: 3-9-2022
Motion Response
Filed By: Douglas Poland
Submit Date: 3-9-2022
Motion Response
Filed By: Anthony Russomanno
Submit Date: 3-9-2022
Motion Response
Filed By: Steven Kilpatrick
Submit Date: 3-9-2022
Motion Response
Filed By: Tamara Packard
Submit Date: 3-9-2022
Comment: Wisconsin Legislature

OCCD

SC

03-03-2022

Cites

400 Wis. 2d 626

OCCD

SC

03-03-2022

Public Domain Citation

Comment: PDC No: 2022 WI 14

OCCD

SC

02-03-2022

Response

Comment: paper copies by 9 am of responses to Hunter's Motion emailed filed yesterday

OCCD

SC

02-02-2022

Response

Comment: responses to Hunter Intervernors' motion due by 12:00 p.m. not to exceed five pages in length if monospaced, or 1,100 words if proportional serif font; 17 paper copies due by 9:00am next business day

OCCD

SC

01-25-2022

Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Response to Hunter's Motion to Provide Authorities re: Oral Argument Question (BLOC)
Response to Hunter's Motion to Provide Authorities re: Oral Argument Question (Evers)
Response to Hunter's Motion to Provide Authorities re: Oral Argument Question (Citizens Mathmaticians)
Response to Hunter's Motion to Provide Authorities re: Oral Argument Question (Wisconsin Legislature)
Response to Hunter's Motion to Provide Authorities re: Oral Argument Question (Congressmen)
Motion to Provide Authorities re: Oral Argument Question (Lisa Hunter et al.)

Filed By: Charles Curtis
Submit Date: 1-25-2022
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 1-31-2022
By the Court.-- Relief granted.
Motion Response
Filed By: Misha Tseytlin
Submit Date: 1-26-2022
Motion Response
Filed By: Mel Barnes
Submit Date: 2-2-2022
Motion Response
Filed By: Anthony Russomanno
Submit Date: 2-2-2022
Motion Response
Filed By: Michael May
Submit Date: 2-2-2022
Motion Response
Filed By: 34783 (St. John, Kevin)
Submit Date: 2-2-2022
Comment: Hunter motion for leave to provide authorities in response to oral argument question Responses: Congressman 1/26/22 - Tseytlin; BLOC 2/2/22 - Barnes; Governor 2/2/22 - Rssomanno; CMS 2/2/22 - May; Legislature 2/2/22 - St. John Cover Letter to Response to Hunter's Motion to Provide Authorities re: Oral Argument Question (Citizen Mathematicians)

OCCD

SC

01-18-2022

Other Papers

Comment: Returned Mail - brief acknowledgments to Attys. Hoffman and Edmondson - Re-sent same day

OCCD

SC

01-18-2022

Response

Comment: by 12:00 noon parties needing special access, visual or hearing arrangements shall advise Clerk of Supreme Court

OCCD

SC

01-14-2022

Other Papers

Comment: Uniform proposed maps filed by Lisa Hunter et al.

OCCD

SC

01-14-2022

Letter/Correspondence

Comment: Letter filed by The Congressmen indicating that they are jointly submitting the uniform versions of their proposed maps with the Wisconsin Legislature

OCCD

SC

01-14-2022

Other Papers

Comment: Uniform proposed maps filed by Governor Tony Evers

OCCD

SC

01-14-2022

Other Papers
Cover Letter to Uniform Proposed Maps (Bewley)
Uniform Proposed Maps - 30x40 (Bewley)

Comment: Uniform proposed maps and cover letter filed by Senator Janet Bewley

OCCD

SC

01-14-2022

Response

Comment: uniform versions of proposed maps due as .pdf documents capable of enlargement by 4:00pm via email DUE per CTO of 1/10/22; uniform maps may be accompanied by a cover letter not to exceed 5 pages if monospaced font is used, or 1,100 words if proportional serif font is used; paper originals, transparency originals, and 17 copies of each due by 9:00am following business day

OCCD

SC

01-12-2022

Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
01-13-2022 Order
Motion for Pro Hac Vice status (Trepp)

Filed By: Sarah Zylstra
Submit Date: 1-12-2022
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 1-13-2022
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is granted. A copy of Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party's order.
Comment: Motion to admit Attorney Alex Trepp to appear PHV on behalf of Citizen Mathematicians and Scientists

OCCD

SC

01-11-2022

Court Order
01-11-2022 Order

IT IS ORDERED that the court will hear oral argument in this matter on Wednesday,
January 19, 2022, beginning 9:00 a.m., in the Supreme Court Hearing Room, 2nd Floor, East Wing
of the State Capitol, Madison, Wisconsin. The parties will each have 30 minutes of initial oral
argument time and an additional 10 minutes for rebuttal. The parties will present their initial
arguments in the following sequence:
1. Petitioners Billie Johnson, et al.;
2. Intervenor-Respondent Janet Bewley, Senate Democratic Minority Leader,
on behalf of the Senate Democratic Caucus;
3. Intervenors-Petitioners Black Leaders Organizing for Communities, Voces
de la Frontera, League of Women Voters of Wisconsin, Cindy Fallona, Lauren Stephenson,
and Rebecca Alwin;
4. Intervenor-Respondent the Wisconsin Legislature;
5. Intervenor-Respondent Governor Tony Evers;
6. Intervenors-Petitioners Lisa Hunter, Jacob Zabel, Jennifer Oh, John Persa,
Geraldine Schertz, and Kathleen Qualheim;
7. Intervenors-Petitioners Gary Krenz, Sarah J. Hamilton, Stephen Joseph
Wright, Jean-Luc Thiffeault, and Somesh Jha (a/k/a "Citizen Mathematicians and
Scientists); and
8. Intervenors-Petitioners Congressmen Glenn Grothman, Mike Gallagher,
Bryan Steil, Tom Tiffany, and Scott Fitzgerald ("Congressmen");
Rebuttal arguments will begin immediately after the conclusion of the initial argument of the
Congressmen; rebuttal shall be presented in the same order as the initial arguments;
Comment: Part 1 of 2

OCCD

SC

01-10-2022

Court Order
01-10-2022 Order (re: Uniform Versions of Proposed Maps)

IT IS ORDERED that the parties are directed to convene and agree upon a standard template, resolution and other uniform guidelines to which each party will adhere in submitting their proposed maps in the uniform revised format consistent with the terms of this order;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by 4:00 p.m. on January 14, 2022 the parties shall submit uniform versions of their proposed maps as .pdf documents capable of enlargement;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party's uniform map submission may be accompanied by a cover letter not to exceed five pages if a monospaced font is used or 1,100 words if a proportional serif font is used, addressing only critical issues that may have been identified when converting the maps from the original format to the standardized format; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the electronic filings in this matter shall be filed as an attachment in .pdf format to an email addressed to clerk@wicourts.gov. See Wis. Stat. 809.70, 809.80 and 809.81. The paper originals, transparency originals, and 17 copies of each must be received by the clerk of this court by 9:00 a.m. of the business day following submission by email, with the paper document bearing the following notation on the top of the first page: "This document was previously filed via email."

OCCD

SC

01-07-2022

Court Order
01-07-2022 Order

IT IS ORDERED that no later than 9:00 a.m. on Monday, January 10, 2022, all parties
shall notify the clerk of this court via a brief email to clerk@wicourts.gov stating only whether
they are or are not presenting oral argument.

OCCD

SC

01-05-2022

Brief of Amicus Curiae
Brief of Amicus Curiae (Legal Scholars)

Filed By: Allison Boldt
Comment: Legal Scholars; Non-Party Brief

OCCD

SC

01-05-2022

Response

Comment: response to Congressmen "motion to submit a modified version of their Proposed Remedial Map for this Court's consideration" due via email by 4:00pm. Responses shall not exceed 10 pages if a monospaced font is used or 2,200 words if a proportional serif font is used, but parties are encouraged to strive for brevity. 10 paper copies due by 12:00 noon the following business day.

OCCD

SC

01-04-2022

Other Brief
Expert Report of Dr. Stephen Ansolabehere (Attachment to Lisa Hunter Reply Brief)
Reply Brief per CTO of 11/17/21 (Lisa Hunter et al.)

Filed By: Charles Curtis
Comment: Lisa Hunter, Jacob Zabel, Jennifer Oh, John Persa, Geraldine Schertz, and Kathleen Qualheim; Reply Brief per court order of 11/17/2021 with attached Expert Report of Dr. Stephen Ansolabehere

OCCD

SC

01-04-2022

Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
01-05-2022 Order (Granting Legal Scholars' Amicus Motion)
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief (Legal Scholars)

Filed By: Allison Boldt
Submit Date: 1-4-2022
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 1-5-2022
IT IS ORDERED that Legal Scholars' motion for leave to file a non-party brief amicus curiae is granted and the brief filed with the motion is accepted as filed; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Legal Scholars' motion for leave to participate in oral argument is held in abeyance pending further order of the court.
Comment: Richard Briffault, Joseph Fishkin, James A. Gardner, Michael S. Kang, D. Theodore Rave, David Schultz, Kate Shaw, and Robert Yablon (Legal Scholars)

OCCD

SC

01-04-2022

Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Exhibit E to Motion to File Corrected Proposed Maps (BLOC)
Motion to File Corrected Version of Proposed Maps (BLOC)

Filed By: Douglas Poland
Submit Date: 1-4-2022
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 1-10-2022
IT IS ORDERED that the motion of intervenors-petitioners, Congressmen Glen Grothman, Mike Gallagher, Bryan Steil, Tom Tiffany, and Scott Fitzgerald (Congressmen) is denied. The Congressmen's map, submitted as Exhibit A to its motion is not accepted and will not be further considered by the court;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of intervenors-petitioners, Black Leaders Organizing for Communities, et al., is granted. The corrected assembly and senate maps filed as Exhibits C and D to their January 3, 2022 motion shall replace the maps previously filed by these intervenors-petitioners on December 15, 2020; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of intervenor-respondent, Governor Tony Evers, is granted. The corrected assembly and senate maps filed in Attachment C to his January 6, 2022 motion shall replace the maps previously filed by Governor Evers on December 15, 2020.
PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, J. (dissenting). Redistricting is a new challenge for this court, and as such I would accept all assistance from all parties. The majority seems to hold this view for Governor Evers and the BLOC plaintiffs, but a different view for the Congressmen.
I don't know whether the second map the Congressmen would like to submit will be helpful or not. It is possible that it would have provided no more than what we actually will hear in rebuttal during oral arguments later this month. In addition, I have already reviewed Governor Evers' map and that of the BLOC plaintiffs, as I assume most justices have. Therefore, the court is permitting Governor Evers and the BLOC plaintiffs to file second maps that have very significant changes. For example, Governor Evers'
-Original Assembly map had 174 Municipal splits, but his "corrected" map has 115 Municipal splits.
-His Senate map had 118 Municipal splits, but his "corrected" map has 76 Municipal splits.
- His origi
Comment: BLOC motion to file corrected version of proposed maps; exhibit filed separately 1/7/22

OCCD

SC

01-04-2022

Other Papers
Affidavit of Kevin M. LeRoy w/ Attachment (Congressmen)

Comment: Affidavit of Kevin M. LeRoy, with attached memorandum from the Legislative Reference Bureau to Speaker Robin Vos

OCCD

SC

01-04-2022

Other Brief
Expert Report of Dr. Daryl Deford (Attachment to Citizen Mathematicians Reply Brief)
Reply Brief per CTO of 11/17/21 (Citizen Mathematicians)

Filed By: Douglas Poland
Comment: Citizen Mathematicians and Scientists; Reply Brief per court order of 11/17/2021, with attached Expert Report of Dr. Daryl Deford

OCCD

SC

01-04-2022

Other Brief
Reply Brief per CTO of 11/17/21 (Wisconsin Legislature)
Expert Report of Dr. John Alford (Attachment to Wisconsin Legislature Reply Brief)

Filed By: 34783 (St. John, Kevin)
Comment: Wisconsin Legislature; Reply Brief per court order of 11/17/2021, with attached Expert Report of Dr. John Alford

OCCD

SC

01-04-2022

Court Order
01-04-2022 Order

IT IS ORDERED that the motion of the intervenor-petitioners Congressmen Glenn Grothman, Mike Gallagher, Bryan Steil, Tom Tiffany, and Scott Fitzgerald seeking leave to submit a modified version of their Proposed Remedial Map for this Court's consideration is held in abeyance until further order of the court;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before 4:00 p.m. on January 5, 2022, the other parties may file a response to the intervenor-petitioners Congressmen Glenn Grothman, Mike Gallagher, Bryan Steil, Tom Tiffany, and Scott Fitzgeralds motion seeking leave to submit a modified version of their Proposed Remedial Map for this Court's consideration. The response shall not exceed 10 pages if a monospaced font is used or 2,200 words if a proportional serif font is used, but the parties are encouraged to strive for brevity. The court does not anticipate permitting a reply from the Congressmen and this order does not alter the existing briefing schedule;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all filings in this matter shall be filed as an attachment in pdf format to an email addressed to clerk@wicourts.gov. See Wis. Stat. 809.70, 809.80 and 809.81. A paper original and 10 copies of each filed document must be received by the clerk of this court by 12:00 noon of the business day following submission by email, with the document bearing the following notation on the top of the first page: "This document was previously filed via email."

OCCD

SC

01-04-2022

Response

Comment: that any non-party that wishes to file a non-party brief amicus curiae in support of or in opposition to a proposed map must file a motion for leave of the court to file a non-party brief. Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.19 (7). Non-parties should consult this courts Internal Operating Procedure III.B.6.c., concerning the nature of non-parties who may be granted leave to file a non-party brief. A proposed non-party brief must accompany the motion for leave to file it and shall not exceed 15 pages if a monospaced font is used or 3,300 words if a proportional serif font is used. Any motion for leave with the proposed non-party brief attached shall be filed no later than 12:00 noon on January 4, 2022. Any proposed non-party brief for which this court does not grant leave will not be considered by the court

OCCD

SC

12-30-2021

Other Brief
Response Brief per CTO of 11/17/21 (Lisa Hunter et al.)
Expert Report of Dr. Stephen Ansolabehere (Attachment to Lisa Hunter Response Brief)

Filed By: Charles Curtis
Comment: Lisa Hunter, Jacob Zabel, Jennifer Oh, John Persa, Geraldine Schertz, and Kathleen Qualheim; Response Brief per court order of 11/17/2021 with attached Expert Report of Dr. Stephen Ansolabehere

OCCD

SC

12-30-2021

Other Brief
Appendix to Response Brief per CTO of 11/17/21 (BLOC)
Response Brief per CTO of 11/17/21 (BLOC)

Filed By: Douglas Poland
Comment: Black Leaders Organizing for Communities, Voces de la Frontera, League of Women Voters of Wisconsin, Cindy Fallona, Lauren Stephenson, and Rebecca Alwin; Response Brief per court order of 11/17/2021

OCCD

SC

12-30-2021

Other Brief
Response Brief per CTO of 11/17/21 (Citizen Mathematicians)
Expert Report of Dr. Daryl Deford (Attachment to Citizen Mathematicians Response Brief)

Filed By: Michael May
Comment: Citizen Mathematicians and Scientists; Response Brief per court order of 11/17/2021, with attached Expert Report of Dr. Daryl Deford

OCCD

SC

12-30-2021

Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Response to Congressmen's Motion to File Corrected Proposed Maps (Evers)
Response to Congressmen's Motion to File Corrected Proposed Maps (Citizen Mathematicians)
Response to Congressmen's Motion to File Corrected Proposed Maps (BLOC)
Response to Congressmen's Motion to File Corrected Proposed Maps (Bewley)
Response to Congressmen's Motion to File Corrected Proposed Maps (Lisa Hunter et al.)
Response to Congressmen's Motion to File Corrected Proposed Maps (Wisconsin Legislature)
Motion to Submit Modified Version of Proposed Congressional Map (Congressmen)

Filed By: Misha Tseytlin
Submit Date: 12-30-2021
Decision: (D) Deny
Decision Date: 1-10-2022
IT IS ORDERED that the motion of intervenors-petitioners, Congressmen Glen Grothman, Mike Gallagher, Bryan Steil, Tom Tiffany, and Scott Fitzgerald (Congressmen) is denied. The Congressmen's map, submitted as Exhibit A to its motion is not accepted and will not be further considered by the court;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of intervenors-petitioners, Black Leaders Organizing for Communities, et al., is granted. The corrected assembly and senate maps filed as Exhibits C and D to their January 3, 2022 motion shall replace the maps previously filed by these intervenors-petitioners on December 15, 2020; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of intervenor-respondent, Governor Tony Evers, is granted. The corrected assembly and senate maps filed in Attachment C to his January 6, 2022 motion shall replace the maps previously filed by Governor Evers on December 15, 2020.
PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, J. (dissenting). Redistricting is a new challenge for this court, and as such I would accept all assistance from all parties. The majority seems to hold this view for Governor Evers and the BLOC plaintiffs, but a different view for the Congressmen.
I don't know whether the second map the Congressmen would like to submit will be helpful or not. It is possible that it would have provided no more than what we actually will hear in rebuttal during oral arguments later this month. In addition, I have already reviewed Governor Evers' map and that of the BLOC plaintiffs, as I assume most justices have. Therefore, the court is permitting Governor Evers and the BLOC plaintiffs to file second maps that have very significant changes. For example, Governor Evers'
-Original Assembly map had 174 Municipal splits, but his "corrected" map has 115 Municipal splits.
-His Senate map had 118 Municipal splits, but his "corrected" map has 76 Municipal splits.
- His orig
Comment: Congressmen motion to submit modified version of proposed congressional map; held in abeyance until further order per CTO of 01/04/2022

OCCD

SC

12-30-2021

Other Brief
Response Brief per CTO of 11/17/21 (Wisconsin Legislature)
Expert Report of Brian J. Gaines (Attachment to Wisconsin Legislature Response Brief)
Expert Report of Dr. John Alford (Attachment to Wisconsin Legislature Response Brief)
Expert Report of Thomas M. Bryan (Attachment to Wisconsin Legislature Response Brief)

Filed By: 34783 (St. John, Kevin)
Comment: Wisconsin Legislature; Response brief per court order of 11/17/2021 with attached Response Expert Reports of Brian J. Gaines, Thomas M. Bryan, and Dr. John Alford

OCCD

SC

12-30-2021

Response

Comment: on or before 12:00 noon on December 30, 2021, each party may file a responsive brief which shall not exceed 25 pages if a monospaced font is used or 5,500 words if a proportional serif font is used. A party that elects to support another partys proposed map may file a letter-brief that shall not exceed 15 pages if a monospaced font is used or 3,300 words if a proportional serif font is used

OCCD

SC

12-15-2021

Other Brief
Brief per CTO of 11/17/21 (Evers)
Expert Report of Jeanne Clelland (Attachment to Evers Brief)

Filed By: Anthony Russomanno
Comment: Governor Tony Evers; Brief per court order of 11/17/2021 with attached Expert Report of Jeanne Clelland

OCCD

SC

12-15-2021

Other Brief
Appendix to Brief per CTO of 11/17/21 (BLOC)
Brief per CTO of 11/17/21 (BLOC)

Filed By: Douglas Poland
Comment: Black Leaders Organizing for Communities, Voces de la Frontera, League of Women Voters of Wisconsin, Cindy Fallona, Lauren Stephenson, and Rebecca Alwin; Brief per court order of 11/17/2021

OCCD

SC

12-15-2021

Other Brief
Brief per CTO of 11/17/21 (Congressmen)
Affidavit of Tom Schreibel (Attachment to Congressmen Brief)
Amended Certification re: Brief per CTO of 11/17/21 (Congressmen)

Filed By: Misha Tseytlin
Comment: Congressmen Glenn Grothman, Mike Gallagher, Bryan Steil, Tom Tiffany, and Scott Fitzgerald; Brief per court order of 11/17/2021 with attached Affidavit of Tom Schreibel

OCCD

SC

12-15-2021

Other Brief
Letter Brief per CTO of 11/17/21 (WILL)

Filed By: Anthony LoCoco
Comment: WILL; Letter brief filed per court order of 11/17/2021.

OCCD

SC

12-14-2021

Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
Motion for Pro Hac Vice status (Devaney)
Proposed Order re: Motion for Pro Hac Vice Status (Devaney)
12/15/2021 Order (Granting Devaney PHV)

Filed By: Charles Curtis
Submit Date: 12-15-2021
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 12-15-2021
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is granted. A copy of Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party's order.
Comment: Motion, w/ proposed order, to admit Atty. John M. Devaney as counsel for Lisa Hunter, Jacob Zabel, Jennifer Oh, John Persa, Geraldine Schertz, and Kathleen Qualheim

OCCD

SC

12-03-2021

Response

Comment: due 4:00 p.m. on December 3, 2021, if parties desire discovery, they shall submit a joint proposed discovery plan that details from whom and how discovery will be sought, with all discovery to be completed on or before December 23, 2021

OCCD

SC

11-30-2021

Cites

967 N.W.2d 469

OCCD

SC

11-30-2021

Public Domain Citation

Comment: PDC No: 2021 WI 87

OCCD

SC

11-17-2021

Court Order
11-17-2021 Order

Part 1 of November 17, 2021 Court Order

IT IS ORDERED that by 4:00 p.m. on December 3, 2021, if parties desire discovery, they shall submit a joint proposed discovery plan that details from whom and how discovery will be sought, with all discovery to be completed on or before December 23, 2021;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before 12:00 noon on December 15, 2021, each party (including all intervenors) may file a proposed map (for state assembly, state senate, and congress), complying with the parameters set forth in the courts forthcoming decision, a supporting brief, and an expert report; or, a party may file a letter-brief stating the party supports a map proposed by another party. Any brief filed in support of a proposed map shall not exceed 50 pages if a monospaced font is used or 11,000 words if a proportional serif font is used. A letter-brief filed in support of another partys proposed map shall not exceed 15 pages if a monospaced font is used or 3,300 words if a proportional serif font is used;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any expert report filed in support of a proposed map and accompanying its supporting brief shall strive for brevity and shall contain an executive summary not to exceed five pages if a monospaced font is used or 1,100 words if a proportional serif font is used;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before 12:00 noon on December 30, 2021, each party may file a responsive brief which shall not exceed 25 pages if a monospaced font is used or 5,500 words if a proportional serif font is used. A party that elects to support another partys proposed map may file a letter-brief that shall not exceed 15 pages if a monospaced font is used or 3,300 words if a proportional serif font is used;

OCCD

SC

11-17-2021

Court Order

Part 3 of Novrember 17, 2021 Court Order


IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any party that filed a proposed map and subsequently determines that it merits a correction or modification, may file a motion seeking the courts leave to amend the proposed map. Such motion shall include a description of the amendments, the reasons for them, a proposed amended map, and shall state whether the motion is unopposed by other the parties. The court may request responses from the other parties; unsolicited responses to such a motion will be disfavored;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are advised that the court may elect to conduct a hearing and/or oral argument on one or more of four consecutive days beginning January 18, 2022; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all filings in this matter shall be filed as an attachment in pdf format to an email addressed to clerk@wicourts.gov. See Wis. Stat. 809.70, 809.80 and 809.81. A paper original and 10 copies of each filed document must be received by the clerk of this court by 12:00 noon of the business day following submission by email, with the document bearing the following notation on the top of the first page: "This document was previously filed via email."

OCCD

SC

11-04-2021

Response

Comment: joint stipulation of facts and law identifying and listing disputed facts & suggested procedure for resolution, due from petitioners, intervenor-petitioners, respondents, and intervenor-respondents by 12:00 noon

OCCD

SC

11-01-2021

Response Brief-Supreme Court
Response Brief (Lisa Hunter et al.)

Filed By: Charles Curtis
Comment: Lisa Hunter, Jacob Zabel, Jennifer Oh, John Persa, Geraldine Schertz, and Kathleen Qualheim

OCCD

SC

11-01-2021

Response Brief-Supreme Court
Response Brief (WILL)

Filed By: Lucas Vebber
Comment: WILL

OCCD

SC

11-01-2021

Response Brief-Supreme Court
Response Brief (Wisconsin Legislature)

Filed By: 34783 (St. John, Kevin)
Comment: Wisconsin Legislature

OCCD

SC

11-01-2021

Response Brief-Supreme Court
Response Brief (Congressmen)

Filed By: Misha Tseytlin
Comment: Congressmen Glenn Grothman, Mike Gallagher, Bryan Steil, Tom Tiffany, and Scott Fitzgerald

OCCD

SC

11-01-2021

Response

Comment: answer to omnibus amended petition due from respondents and intervenor-respondents by 12:00 noon

OCCD

SC

10-25-2021

Brief of Amicus Curiae
Brief of Amicus Curiae (William Whitford, et al.)

Filed By: Jakob Feltham
Comment: William Whitford, Hans Breitenmoser, Mary Lynne Donohue, Wendy Sue Johnson, and Deborah Patel

OCCD

SC

10-25-2021

Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
10-26-2021 Order (Granting PHV Motion)
Attachment to 10-25-2021 and 10-26-2021 Orders
Motion for Pro Hac Vice status (Hoffman, Hirsch, Fate, Edmondson, Amunson)
Application for Pro Hac Vice status (Jessica Amunson)
Application for Pro Hac Vice status (Elizabeth Edmondson)
Application for Pro Hac Vice status (Rebecca Fate)
Application for Pro Hac Vice status (Sam Hirsch)
Application for Pro Hac Vice status (Olivia Hoffman)

Filed By: Sarah Zylstra
Submit Date: 10-25-2021
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 10-26-2021
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is granted. A copy of Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party's order.
Comment: Motion to Admit Non-Resident attorneys Olivia Hoffman, Sam Hirsch, Rebecca Fate, Elizabeth Edmondson, and Jessica Ring Amunson w/ individual applications

OCCD

SC

10-25-2021

First Brief-Supreme Court
Brief per CTO of 10/14/2021 (Evers)

Filed By: Anthony Russomanno
Comment: Governor Tony Evers

OCCD

SC

10-25-2021

First Brief-Supreme Court
Brief per CTO of 10/14/2021 (WILL)

Filed By: Lucas Vebber
Comment: WILL

OCCD

SC

10-25-2021

First Brief-Supreme Court
Brief per CTO of 10/14/2021 (Bewley)

Filed By: Tamara Packard
Comment: Janet Bewley, State Senate Democratic Minority Leader

OCCD

SC

10-25-2021

First Brief-Supreme Court
Brief per CTO of 10/14/2021 (Congressmen)

Filed By: Misha Tseytlin
Comment: Congressmen Glenn Grothman, Mike Gallagher, Bryan Steil, Tom Tiffany, and Scott Fitzgerald

OCCD

SC

10-25-2021

Complaint & Order to Answer

OCCD

SC

10-25-2021

Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief (Whitford et al.)

Filed By: Jakob Feltham
Submit Date: 10-25-2021
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 10-25-2021
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is granted and the brief is accepted as filed; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to admit Attorney Ruth M. Greenwood, pro hac vice, is granted. A copy of Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party's order. The court also acknowledges and accepts the law student certification filed by Christopher T. Bavitz, Vice-Dean for Experiential and Clinical Education at the Harvard Law School, and the affidavit in support of the law school certification filed by Attorney Jakob E. Feltham, for the certification pursuant to Supreme Court Rule Ch. 50 of Harvard Law School students Mary F. Brown, Mark R. Haidar. Meredith A. Manda, Sarah A. Sadlier, and Corey M. Stewart.
Comment: William Whitford, Hans Breitenmoser, Mary Lynne Donohue, Wendy Sue Johnson, and Deborah Patel

OCCD

SC

10-21-2021

Petition for an Original Action
Letter re: Amended Signature Pages for Response to Omnibus Petition (WEC)
Amended Signature Pages for Response to Omnibus Petition (WEC)
Response to Omnibus Petition (Bewley)
Response to Omnibus Petition (Wisconsin Legislature)
Response to Omnibus Petition (WEC)
Certificate of Service re: Response to Omnibus Petition (WEC)
Response to Omnibus Petition (Evers)
Omnibus Amended Original Action Petition

Filed By: Anthony LoCoco
Submit Date: 10-21-2021
Decision: (O) Other
Decision Date: 3-3-2022
By the Court.-- Relief granted.
Motion Response
Filed By: Tamara Packard
Submit Date: 10-28-2021
Motion Response
Filed By: 34783 (St. John, Kevin)
Submit Date: 10-28-2021
Motion Response
Filed By: Thomas Bellavia
Submit Date: 10-28-2021
Motion Response
Filed By: Brian Keenan
Submit Date: 10-28-2021
Comment: Omnibus Amended Petition per CTO of 10/14/21

OCCD

SC

10-19-2021

Notice of Appearance
Notice of Appearance (Gerads)

Comment: Attorney Carly Gerads appearing for INT-PET Black Leaders Organizing for Communities, Voces de la Frontera, the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin, Cindy Fallona, Lauren Stephenson, and Rebecca Alwin

OCCD

SC

10-15-2021

Fee Paid

Comment: Invoice No: 20019; Receipt No: 21R 002393

OCCD

SC

10-15-2021

Invoice Issued

Comment: Invoice No: 20019

OCCD

SC

10-14-2021

Court Order
10-14-2021 Order (2nd Order re: Briefs)

IT IS ORDERED that the parties (including all intervenors) shall file simultaneous briefs addressing the following questions:
1.) Under the relevant state and federal laws, what factors should we consider in evaluating or creating new maps?
2.) The petitioners ask us to modify existing maps using a "least-change" approach. Should we do so, and if not, what approach should we use?
3.) Is the partisan makeup of districts a valid factor for us to consider in evaluating or creating new maps?
4.) As we evaluate or create new maps, what litigation process should we use to determine a constitutionally sufficient map?
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall file an initial brief on or before 12:00 noon, October 25, 2021, and each party may file a response brief on or before 12:00 noon, November 1, 2021. The form, length, pagination, appendix, and certification requirements shall be the same as those governing standard appellate briefing in this court for a brief-in chief and a response brief;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all filings in this matter shall be filed as an attachment in pdf format to an email addressed to clerk@wicourts.gov. See Wis. Stat. 809.70, 809.80 and 809.81. A paper original and 10 copies of each filed document must be received by the clerk of this court by 12:00 noon of the business day following submission by email, with the document bearing the following notation on the top of the first page: "This document was previously filed via email"; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that requests for additional briefing or extensions will be viewed with disfavor.

OCCD

SC

10-13-2021

Response
Response to Letter Briefs (WILL)

Comment: WILL Response to Letter Briefs

OCCD

SC

10-13-2021

Response
Response to Motions to Intervene (Wisconsin Legislature)

Comment: Wisconsin Legislature Response to Motions to Intervene

OCCD

SC

10-13-2021

Response
Response to Motions to Intervene (Congressmen)

Comment: Congressmen Response to Motions to Intervene

OCCD

SC

10-13-2021

Response
Response to Letter Briefs (Lisa Hunter et al.)

Comment: Lisa Hunter (et al.) Response to Letter Briefs

OCCD

SC

10-13-2021

Response
Response to Letter Briefs (BLOC)

Comment: BLOC Response to Letter Briefs

OCCD

SC

10-13-2021

Response
Response to Letter Briefs (Citizen Mathematicians)

Comment: Citizen Mathematicians and Scientists Response to Letter Briefs

OCCD

SC

10-13-2021

Response

Comment: parties, amici, and proposed intervenors may each file a single response to the collective motions to intervene no later than 12:00 p.m. on October 13, 2021, provided that amici who seek to intervene may file only a single response to the proposed intervention motions, which shall be filed in their capacity as amici. Each response shall not exceed 15 pages if a monospaced font is used or 3,300 words if a proportional serif font is used;

OCCD

SC

10-07-2021

Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
Motion for Pro Hac Vice status (Harris, Meehan, McGlone)
PHV Motion Exhibit A (Harris)
PHV Motion Exhibit B (Meehan)
PHV Motion Exhibit C (McGlone)

Filed By: (St. John, Kevin)
Submit Date: 10-7-2021
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 10-12-2021
IT IS ORDERED that the motions are granted. A copy of Supreme Court Rule (SCR)
10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to each
moving party's order.
Comment: Attorneys Jeffrey M. Harris, Taylor A.R. Meehan, and James P. McGlone w/ exhibits

OCCD

SC

10-06-2021

Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Proposed Petition for Original Action (Congressmen)

Filed By: Misha Tseytlin
Submit Date: 10-6-2021
Decision: (N) No Action
Decision Date: 10-14-2021
IT IS ORDERED that each of the pending motions to intervene is granted;
The intervenor-petitioners have each submitted with their motions to intervene a proposed complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief/petition for original action. The court wishes to have one controlling petition, rather than multiple petitions in this action. Therefore, no later than 12:00 noon on October 21, 2021, the petitioners and the intervenor-petitioners shall file a single omnibus amended petition that, in numbered paragraph form, restates the previously asserted allegations and claims advanced by petitioners Billie Johnson, et al., and states the allegations and claims of each intervening petitioner as provided in its proposed complaints/petition, with those claims and allegations consolidated to the extent possible. No additional memorandum of law shall accompany the omnibus amended petition. This omnibus amended petition shall supersede the previously filed petition in this action;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than 12:00 noon on October 28, 2021, the respondents and intervenor-respondents shall each file an answer to the omnibus amended petition;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than 12:00 noon on November 4, 2021, the petitioners, intervenor-petitioners, respondents, and intervenor-respondents shall prepare and submit a joint stipulation of facts and law; and shall identify and list disputed facts, if any, and suggest a procedure for resolving them; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all filings in this matter shall be filed as an attachment in pdf format to an email addressed to clerk@wicourts.gov. See, Wis. Stat. 809.14, 809.70, 809.80, and 809.81. A paper original and 10 copies of each filed document must be received by the clerk of this court by 12:00 p.m. of the business day following submission by email, with the document bearing the following notati
Comment: Proposed Petition for Original Action; Congressmen Glenn Grothman, Mike Gallagher, Bryan Steil, Tom Tiffany, and Scott Fitzgerald

OCCD

SC

10-06-2021

Motion to Intervene
10-14-2021 Order (Granting Motions to Intervene)
Motion to Intervene (Congressmen)
Memo in Support of Motion to Intervene (Congressmen)
Appendix to Memo in Support of Motion to Intervene (Congressmen)

Filed By: Misha Tseytlin
Submit Date: 10-6-2021
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 10-14-2021
IT IS ORDERED that each of the pending motions to intervene is granted;
The intervenor-petitioners have each submitted with their motions to intervene a proposed complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief/petition for original action. The court wishes to have one controlling petition, rather than multiple petitions in this action. Therefore, no later than 12:00 noon on October 21, 2021, the petitioners and the intervenor-petitioners shall file a single omnibus amended petition that, in numbered paragraph form, restates the previously asserted allegations and claims advanced by petitioners Billie Johnson, et al., and states the allegations and claims of each intervening petitioner as provided in its proposed complaints/petition, with those claims and allegations consolidated to the extent possible. No additional memorandum of law shall accompany the omnibus amended petition. This omnibus amended petition shall supersede the previously filed petition in this action;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than 12:00 noon on October 28, 2021, the respondents and intervenor-respondents shall each file an answer to the omnibus amended petition;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than 12:00 noon on November 4, 2021, the petitioners, intervenor-petitioners, respondents, and intervenor-respondents shall prepare and submit a joint stipulation of facts and law; and shall identify and list disputed facts, if any, and suggest a procedure for resolving them; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all filings in this matter shall be filed as an attachment in pdf format to an email addressed to clerk@wicourts.gov. See, Wis. Stat. 809.14, 809.70, 809.80, and 809.81. A paper original and 10 copies of each filed document must be received by the clerk of this court by 12:00 p.m. of the business day following submission by email, with the document bearing the following notation o
Comment: Proposed Intervenors: Congressmen Glenn Grothman, Mike Gallagher, Bryan Steil, Tom Tiffany, and Scott Fitzgerald

OCCD

SC

10-06-2021

Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (Lisa Hunter et al.)

Filed By: Aria Branch
Submit Date: 10-6-2021
Decision: (N) No Action
Decision Date: 10-14-2021
IT IS ORDERED that each of the pending motions to intervene is granted;
The intervenor-petitioners have each submitted with their motions to intervene a proposed complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief/petition for original action. The court wishes to have one controlling petition, rather than multiple petitions in this action. Therefore, no later than 12:00 noon on October 21, 2021, the petitioners and the intervenor-petitioners shall file a single omnibus amended petition that, in numbered paragraph form, restates the previously asserted allegations and claims advanced by petitioners Billie Johnson, et al., and states the allegations and claims of each intervening petitioner as provided in its proposed complaints/petition, with those claims and allegations consolidated to the extent possible. No additional memorandum of law shall accompany the omnibus amended petition. This omnibus amended petition shall supersede the previously filed petition in this action;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than 12:00 noon on October 28, 2021, the respondents and intervenor-respondents shall each file an answer to the omnibus amended petition;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than 12:00 noon on November 4, 2021, the petitioners, intervenor-petitioners, respondents, and intervenor-respondents shall prepare and submit a joint stipulation of facts and law; and shall identify and list disputed facts, if any, and suggest a procedure for resolving them; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all filings in this matter shall be filed as an attachment in pdf format to an email addressed to clerk@wicourts.gov. See, Wis. Stat. 809.14, 809.70, 809.80, and 809.81. A paper original and 10 copies of each filed document must be received by the clerk of this court by 12:00 p.m. of the business day following submission by email, with the document bearing the following notation
Comment: Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief; Lisa Hunter et al.

OCCD

SC

10-06-2021

Other Brief
Letter Brief (BLOC)

Filed By: Mel Barnes
Comment: Black Leaders Organizing for Communities, Voces de la Frontera, the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin, Cindy Fallona, Lauren Stephenson, and Rebecca Alwin

OCCD

SC

10-06-2021

Motion to Intervene
Motion to Intervene (Bewley)

Filed By: Tamara Packard
Submit Date: 10-6-2021
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 10-14-2021
IT IS ORDERED that each of the pending motions to intervene is granted;
The intervenor-petitioners have each submitted with their motions to intervene a proposed complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief/petition for original action. The court wishes to have one controlling petition, rather than multiple petitions in this action. Therefore, no later than 12:00 noon on October 21, 2021, the petitioners and the intervenor-petitioners shall file a single omnibus amended petition that, in numbered paragraph form, restates the previously asserted allegations and claims advanced by petitioners Billie Johnson, et al., and states the allegations and claims of each intervening petitioner as provided in its proposed complaints/petition, with those claims and allegations consolidated to the extent possible. No additional memorandum of law shall accompany the omnibus amended petition. This omnibus amended petition shall supersede the previously filed petition in this action;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than 12:00 noon on October 28, 2021, the respondents and intervenor-respondents shall each file an answer to the omnibus amended petition;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than 12:00 noon on November 4, 2021, the petitioners, intervenor-petitioners, respondents, and intervenor-respondents shall prepare and submit a joint stipulation of facts and law; and shall identify and list disputed facts, if any, and suggest a procedure for resolving them; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all filings in this matter shall be filed as an attachment in pdf format to an email addressed to clerk@wicourts.gov. See, Wis. Stat. 809.14, 809.70, 809.80, and 809.81. A paper original and 10 copies of each filed document must be received by the clerk of this court by 12:00 p.m. of the business day following submission by email, with the document bearing the following notation o
Comment: Proposed Intervenor: Janet Bewley, State Senate Democratic Minority Leader

OCCD

SC

10-06-2021

Motion to Intervene
Motion to Intervene (Wisconsin Legislature)
Memo in Support of Motion to Intervene (Wisconsin Legislature)

Filed By: (St. John, Kevin)
Submit Date: 10-6-2021
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 10-14-2021
IT IS ORDERED that each of the pending motions to intervene is granted;
The intervenor-petitioners have each submitted with their motions to intervene a proposed complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief/petition for original action. The court wishes to have one controlling petition, rather than multiple petitions in this action. Therefore, no later than 12:00 noon on October 21, 2021, the petitioners and the intervenor-petitioners shall file a single omnibus amended petition that, in numbered paragraph form, restates the previously asserted allegations and claims advanced by petitioners Billie Johnson, et al., and states the allegations and claims of each intervening petitioner as provided in its proposed complaints/petition, with those claims and allegations consolidated to the extent possible. No additional memorandum of law shall accompany the omnibus amended petition. This omnibus amended petition shall supersede the previously filed petition in this action;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than 12:00 noon on October 28, 2021, the respondents and intervenor-respondents shall each file an answer to the omnibus amended petition;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than 12:00 noon on November 4, 2021, the petitioners, intervenor-petitioners, respondents, and intervenor-respondents shall prepare and submit a joint stipulation of facts and law; and shall identify and list disputed facts, if any, and suggest a procedure for resolving them; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all filings in this matter shall be filed as an attachment in pdf format to an email addressed to clerk@wicourts.gov. See, Wis. Stat. 809.14, 809.70, 809.80, and 809.81. A paper original and 10 copies of each filed document must be received by the clerk of this court by 12:00 p.m. of the business day following submission by email, with the document bearing the following notation o
Comment: Proposed Intervenors: Wisconsin Legislature

OCCD

SC

10-06-2021

Other Brief
Letter Brief (Evers)

Filed By: Anthony Russomanno
Comment: Governor Tony Evers

OCCD

SC

10-06-2021

Other Brief
Letter Brief (Citizen Mathematicians)

Filed By: Michael May
Comment: Citizen Mathematicians and Scientists

OCCD

SC

10-06-2021

Motion to Intervene
Motion to Intervene (Evers)
Memo in Support of Motion to Intervene (Evers)

Filed By: Anthony Russomanno
Submit Date: 10-6-2021
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 10-14-2021
IT IS ORDERED that each of the pending motions to intervene is granted;
The intervenor-petitioners have each submitted with their motions to intervene a proposed complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief/petition for original action. The court wishes to have one controlling petition, rather than multiple petitions in this action. Therefore, no later than 12:00 noon on October 21, 2021, the petitioners and the intervenor-petitioners shall file a single omnibus amended petition that, in numbered paragraph form, restates the previously asserted allegations and claims advanced by petitioners Billie Johnson, et al., and states the allegations and claims of each intervening petitioner as provided in its proposed complaints/petition, with those claims and allegations consolidated to the extent possible. No additional memorandum of law shall accompany the omnibus amended petition. This omnibus amended petition shall supersede the previously filed petition in this action;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than 12:00 noon on October 28, 2021, the respondents and intervenor-respondents shall each file an answer to the omnibus amended petition;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than 12:00 noon on November 4, 2021, the petitioners, intervenor-petitioners, respondents, and intervenor-respondents shall prepare and submit a joint stipulation of facts and law; and shall identify and list disputed facts, if any, and suggest a procedure for resolving them; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all filings in this matter shall be filed as an attachment in pdf format to an email addressed to clerk@wicourts.gov. See, Wis. Stat. 809.14, 809.70, 809.80, and 809.81. A paper original and 10 copies of each filed document must be received by the clerk of this court by 12:00 p.m. of the business day following submission by email, with the document bearing the following notati
Comment: Proposed Intervenor: Governor Tony Evers

OCCD

SC

10-06-2021

Response

Comment: parties and prospective intervenors are each directed to submit simultaneous letter briefs no later than 4:00 p.m. on October 6, 2021, addressing the following question regarding date for redistricting

OCCD

SC

09-29-2021

Fee Paid

Comment: Receipt No: 21R 002259

OCCD

SC

09-29-2021

Invoice Issued

Comment: Invoice No: 20015

OCCD

SC

09-24-2021

Motion to Intervene
Brief in Support of Motion to Intervene (BLOC)
Motion to Intervene (BLOC)

Filed By: Douglas Poland
Submit Date: 9-24-2021
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 10-14-2021
IT IS ORDERED that each of the pending motions to intervene is granted;
The intervenor-petitioners have each submitted with their motions to intervene a proposed complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief/petition for original action. The court wishes to have one controlling petition, rather than multiple petitions in this action. Therefore, no later than 12:00 noon on October 21, 2021, the petitioners and the intervenor-petitioners shall file a single omnibus amended petition that, in numbered paragraph form, restates the previously asserted allegations and claims advanced by petitioners Billie Johnson, et al., and states the allegations and claims of each intervening petitioner as provided in its proposed complaints/petition, with those claims and allegations consolidated to the extent possible. No additional memorandum of law shall accompany the omnibus amended petition. This omnibus amended petition shall supersede the previously filed petition in this action;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than 12:00 noon on October 28, 2021, the respondents and intervenor-respondents shall each file an answer to the omnibus amended petition;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than 12:00 noon on November 4, 2021, the petitioners, intervenor-petitioners, respondents, and intervenor-respondents shall prepare and submit a joint stipulation of facts and law; and shall identify and list disputed facts, if any, and suggest a procedure for resolving them; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all filings in this matter shall be filed as an attachment in pdf format to an email addressed to clerk@wicourts.gov. See, Wis. Stat. 809.14, 809.70, 809.80, and 809.81. A paper original and 10 copies of each filed document must be received by the clerk of this court by 12:00 p.m. of the business day following submission by email, with the document bearing the following notation o
Comment: Proposed Intervenors: Black Leaders Organizing for Communities, Voces de la Frontera, The League of Women Voters of Wisconsin, Cindy Fallona, Lauren Stephenson, and Rebecca Alwin

OCCD

SC

09-24-2021

Letter/Correspondence

Comment: Letter from Attorney Mortara re: address update

OCCD

SC

09-20-2021

Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
Motion for Pro Hac Vice status (Mark P. Gaber)
09-21-2021 Order Granting PHV Motions
Affidavit of Mark P. Gaber in Support of PHV Motion
Affidavit of Douglas M. Poland (Gaber PHV Motion)
Proposed order re: Gaber PHV Motion
Motion for Pro Hac Vice status (Christopher Lamar)
Affidavit of Christopher Lamar in Support of PHV Motion
Affidavit of Douglas M. Poland (Lamar PHV Motion)
Proposed order re: Lamar PHV Motion

Filed By: Douglas Poland
Submit Date: 9-20-2021
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 9-21-2021
IT IS ORDERED that the motions are granted. A copy of Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party's order.
Comment: Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Nonresident Attorney Mark P. Gaber, Affidavit in Support of Motion, Affidavit of Mark P. Gaber, SCR 10.03(4) application materials

OCCD

SC

09-17-2021

Letter/Correspondence
Letter from Congressmen re: Development

Comment: Letter (with exhibit) from Atty. Tseytlin on behalf of the Congressmen re: new development

OCCD

SC

09-08-2021

Notice of Appearance
Notice of Appearance (Kilpatrick)

Comment: AAG Kilpatrick for State

OCCD

SC

09-08-2021

Brief of Amicus Curiae
Brief of Amicus Curiae (Daniel Suhr)

Filed By: Daniel Suhr
Comment: Daniel Suhr

OCCD

SC

09-08-2021

Brief of Amicus Curiae
Brief of Amicus Curiae (Wisconsin Legislature)
Appendix to Brief of Amicus Curiae (Wisconsin Legislature)

Filed By: (St. John, Kevin)
Comment: Wisconsin Legislature

OCCD

SC

09-08-2021

Brief of Amicus Curiae
Brief of Amicus Curiae (Lisa Hunter et al.)

Filed By: Charles Curtis
Comment: Lisa Hunter, Jacob Zabel, Jennifer Oh, John Persa, Geraldine Schertz, and Kathleen Qualheim

OCCD

SC

09-07-2021

Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
09-08-2021 Order Granting Amicus Motions
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief (BLOC)

Filed By: Douglas Poland
Submit Date: 9-7-2021
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 9-8-2021
IT IS ORDERED that each of the motions is granted. All non-party briefs and appendices filed together with the motions are accepted for filing.
Comment: Black Leaders Organizing for Communities ("BLOC"), Voces de la Frontera ("Voces"), League of Women Voters of Wisconsin ("LWVWI"(, Cindy Fallona, Lauren Stephenson, Rebecca Alwin, Helen Harris, Woodrow Wilson Cain, II, Nina Cain, Tracie Y. Horton, Pastor Sean Tatum, Melody McCurtis, Barbara Toles, and Edward Wade, Jr.

OCCD

SC

09-07-2021

Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief (Congressmen)

Filed By: Misha Tseytlin
Submit Date: 9-7-2021
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 9-8-2021
IT IS ORDERED that each of the motions is granted. All non-party briefs and appendices filed together with the motions are accepted for filing.
Comment: Congressmen Glenn Grothman, Mike Gallagher, Bryan Steil, Tom Tiffany, and Scott Fitzgerald (Attorneys Misha Tseytlin and Kevin LeRoy)

OCCD

SC

09-07-2021

Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief (Atty. Suhr)

Filed By: Daniel Suhr
Submit Date: 9-7-2021
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 9-8-2021
IT IS ORDERED that each of the motions is granted. All non-party briefs and appendices filed together with the motions are accepted for filing.
Comment: Attorney Daniel Suhr

OCCD

SC

09-03-2021

Certificate of Service
Certificate of Service (Response to POA)

Comment: re: Response to POA

OCCD

SC

09-03-2021

Response

Comment: response to petition due from all respondents by 4:00pm via email; paper original(s) + 10 paper copies due by 4:30pm

OCCD

SC

08-23-2021

Caption Amended
Notification of Amended Caption

OCCD

SC

08-23-2021

Motion for Stay

Filed By: Richard Esenberg
Submit Date: 8-23-2021
Decision: (M) Dismiss
Decision Date: 3-3-2022
By the Court.-- Relief granted.
Comment: motion for stay embedded in petition, see Page 1 (b), Page 13 "Statement of Relief Sought"