City of Waukesha v. Brian John Zimmer
Appeal Number 2021AP001530
CONSOLIDATED -
List of Consolidated Cases
Court of Appeals District 2
CASE HISTORY
|
Status
|
Court
|
Filing Date
|
Anticipated Due Date
|
Activity
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-28-2022
|
Cites
|
|
|
974 N.W.2d 54
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-28-2022
|
Cites
|
|
|
401 Wis. 2d 541
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-28-2022
|
Opinion Ordered Unpublished
|
|
|
Comment: Opinion Ordered Unpublished - Order
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-28-2022
|
Remittitur
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-23-2022
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Grogan
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Reversed and remanded Pages: 15 Order Text: Order reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings. Comment: Opinion/Decision |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-03-2022
|
Submitted on Briefs
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-31-2022
|
Record and Briefs Sent to District 2
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-28-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: This document is rejected as a duplicate filing. No further action is required because the reply brief was already accepted by the Clerk's office.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-28-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The reply brief is rejected because the appeal numbers on the front cover of the brief are incorrect.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-28-2022
|
Reply Brief
Reply Brief |
|
|
Filed By: Miles Eastman
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-13-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: This document is rejected because only one electronic submission is needed for consolidated cases. No further action is required because the respondent's appendix was previousy accepted by the clerk's office.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-13-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: This document is rejected because only one electronic submission is needed for consolidated cases. No further action is required because the respondent's brief was previousy accepted by the clerk's office.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-13-2022
|
Brief of Respondent(s)
Brief of Respondent |
|
|
Filed By: Dennis Melowski
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-11-2022
|
Delinquent
|
|
|
Comment: New due date of connected BRS: 1-19-2022
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-21-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Response to Motion to Dismiss; It is not necessary to efile documents more than once for consolidated appeals. No action is required to this notice.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-16-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Motion to Dismiss; It is not necessary to efile documents for consolidated appeals more than once. No action is required to this notice.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-16-2021
|
Motion to Dismiss
|
|
|
Filed By: Dennis Melowski
Submit Date: 12-21-2021 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 1-5-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is denied. Motion Response Filed By: Miles Eastman Submit Date: 12-21-2021 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-06-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: This document is rejected as a duplicate document. Only one filing is needed for consolidated cases.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-06-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The appellant's brief is rejected because the brief is not signed. The conclusion and both certifications must be signed. Signatures must either be an electronic signature or a scanned/hand written signature. Electronic signatures must say "electronically signed by," followed by the person's name. The /s/ signature is not acceptable.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-06-2021
|
Brief & Appx of Appellant(s)
Brief of Appellant |
|
|
Filed By: Miles Eastman
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-27-2021
|
Record
|
|
|
Comment: 1-1 to 22-1 ELECTRONICALLY FILED
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-06-2021
|
Consolidated Case
|
|
|
Comment: [2021AP001530, 2021AP001531]
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-04-2021
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Monica Paz
Submit Date: 10-4-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 10-6-2021 ORD the September 27, 2021 order dismissing appeal 2021AP1531 is vacated. The filing fee paid in 2021AP1530 applies to both appeals. FRO that appeal numbers 2021AP1530 and 2021AP1531 are consolidated for purposes of briefing and disposition. FRO that the motion to extend the time to file the record is granted. The clerk shall transmit the records in 2021AP1530 and 2021AP1531 no later than October 22, 2021. See REC event due on 10-22-2021 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-28-2021
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Miles Eastman
Submit Date: 10-4-2021 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 10-6-2021 ORD the September 27, 2021 order dismissing appeal 2021AP1531 is vacated. The filing fee paid in 2021AP1530 applies to both appeals. FRO that appeal numbers 2021AP1530 and 2021AP1531 are consolidated for purposes of briefing and disposition. FRO that the motion to extend the time to file the record is granted. The clerk shall transmit the records in 2021AP1530 and 2021AP1531 no later than October 22, 2021. Comment: Motion for reconsideration of dismissal of 21AP1531, motion to pay 1 filing fee, and motion for consolidation |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-28-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Copy of Receipt; The copy of the receipt is rejected as it was efiled under the wrong appeal. The letter was efiled under appeal number 21AP1530 but it is for 21AP1531. Please efile the letter under the correct appeal. Additionally, it indicates the filing fee was paid on 9/2/21. It appears only one filing fee was received 9/2/21 but two appeals were filed, so, two filing fees would be due.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-28-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Letter re Filing Fee; The letter is rejected as it was efiled under the wrong appeal. The letter was efiled under appeal number 21AP1530 but it is for 21AP1531. Please efile the letter under the correct appeal. Additionally, it indicates the filing fee was paid on 9/2/21. It appears only one filing fee was received 9/2/21 but two appeals were filed, so, two filing fees would be due.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-14-2021
|
Caption Amended
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-14-2021
|
Statement on Transcript
|
|
|
Filed By: Dennis Melowski
Status: Prev. Filed |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-03-2021
|
Fee Paid
|
|
|
Comment: Invoice No: 19987; Receipt No: 21R 002025
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-03-2021
|
Invoice Issued
|
|
|
Comment: Invoice No: 19987
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-02-2021
|
Notice of Docketing of Appeal
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-02-2021
|
Court Order for Filing Fee Issued
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-02-2021
|
Notice of Appeal filed in Cir. Ct.
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-02-2021
|
Notice of Appeal & Court Record
|
|
|
Comment: Notice of Appeal Circuit Court Docket
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-02-2021
|
Docketing Statement from Appellant
|
|
|
Comment: Docketing Statement
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-13-2021
|
Order of Circuit Court
|
|