State v. A. G.
Appeal Number 2022AP000652
CONFIDENTIAL
Supreme Court
CASE HISTORY
|
Status
|
Court
|
Filing Date
|
Anticipated Due Date
|
Activity
|
|
PEND
|
SC
|
Awaiting Opinion/Decision
|
||
|
PEND
|
SC
|
Awaiting Assignment
|
||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-17-2023
|
Oral Argument
|
|
|
Comment: 1:30 p.m. (State Capitol SC Hearing Room) January Oral Argument Calendar. Katie Gutowski for Petitioner-Respondent-Petitioner, Courtney L.A. Roelandts - Guardian Ad Litem, Christopher Sobic for Respondent-Appellant
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-06-2023
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Katie Gutowski
Submit Date: 1-6-2023 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-11-2023 IT IS ORDERED that the motion for additional argument time is granted. The guardian ad litem and the State of Wisconsin shall have an additional ten minutes of oral argument time; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the respondent-appellant, A.G. shall also have an additional ten minutes of oral argument time. PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, J., did not participate. Comment: Joint Motion for Extra Time Allotment at Oral Argument |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-20-2022
|
Reply Brief-Supreme Court
|
|
|
Filed By: Courtney R
Comment: GAL |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-16-2022
|
Certificate of Filing by Mail
|
|
|
Comment: re: BR3
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-16-2022
|
Reply Brief-Supreme Court
|
|
|
Filed By: Katie Gutowski
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-06-2022
|
Certificate of Filing by Mail
|
|
|
Comment: re: BR2
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-06-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The electronic version of the Appendix to Response Brief of Respondent-Appellant is rejected as the appeal number on the appendix cover incorrectly contains a "-CR" suffix. Please upload a corrected electronic version.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-06-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The electronic version of the Response Brief of Respondent-Appellant is rejected as the appeal number on the brief cover incorrectly contains a "-CR" suffix. Please upload a corrected electronic version.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-06-2022
|
Response Brief-Supreme Court
|
|
|
Filed By: Christopher Sobic
Comment: Please note that the case suffix on the brief and appendix covers were corrected by the clerk's office. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-30-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The Objection to the Motion to Extend Time is rejected because there is currently no statutory provision for the acceptance of this type of electronic document in the Supreme Court. Please send the requisite number of hardcopies to the clerk's office for filing if you have not done so already.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-29-2022
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Christopher Sobic
Submit Date: 11-29-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 11-30-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the motion for an extension of time is granted in part. Respondent-appellant's response brief shall be served and filed on or before December 5, 2022. In light of the upcoming oral argument, further extension requests are unlikely to be granted. Motion Response Filed By: Courtney R Submit Date: 11-30-2022 See BR2 event due on 12-5-2022 Comment: objection filed by GAL 11/30/22 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-18-2022
|
Assigned-Oral Argument
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-10-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The electronic version of the Appendix to the Guardian ad Litem-Petitioner's Brief filed on November 10, 2022 is rejected as the form and content are not identical to the paper version. Specifically, please see the table of contents.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-10-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The electronic version of the Guardian ad Litem-Petitioner's Brief filed on November 10, 2022 is rejected as the form and content are not identical to the paper version. Specifically, please see the table of contents, and pages 18-19.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-10-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The electronic version of the Appendix of GAL-Petitioner's Brief filed on November 8, 2022 is rejected as the appendix certification is incomplete. Please see Rule 809.19(8g)(b)(1).
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-10-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The electronic version of the Guardian ad Litem-Petitioner's Brief filed on November 8, 2022 is rejected for the following defects:
1) The format of the electronic version does not match the paper version. Specifically, please see pages 18 and 19.
2) The brief is missing the electronic filing certificate pursuant to Rule 809.19(12).
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-10-2022
|
Certificate of Filing by Mail
|
|
|
Comment: re: State's BR1
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-10-2022
|
First Brief-Supreme Court
|
|
|
Filed By: Courtney R
Comment: GAL, Courtney L.A. Roelandts First Brief-Supreme Court - Appendix - Another page 152 (Appendix Certification) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-09-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The eFiled version of the Appendix to the First Brief-Supreme Court is being rejected as the party designations are incorrect in the case caption on the appendix cover. Please e-file a corrected appendix.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-09-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: The eFiled version of the First Brief-Supreme Court is being rejected as the party designations are incorrect in the case caption on the brief cover. Please e-file a corrected brief.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-09-2022
|
First Brief-Supreme Court
|
|
|
Comment: State of Wisconsin. Please note that the party designations have been corrected on the Brief and Appendix covers.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-11-2022
|
Court Changed to Supreme Court
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-31-2022
|
Cites
|
|
|
979 N.W.2d 822
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-31-2022
|
Cites
|
|
|
404 Wis. 2d 511
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-31-2022
|
Opinion Ordered Unpublished
|
|
|
Comment: Opinion Ordered Unpublished - Order
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-22-2022
|
Certificate of Filing by Mail
|
|
|
Comment: re: PRE response
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-09-2022
|
Fee Waived
|
|
|
Comment: State filed (GAL)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-09-2022
|
Petition for Review
|
|
|
Filed By: Courtney R
Submit Date: 8-22-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 10-11-2022 IT IS ORDERED that both petitions are granted and that pursuant to Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.62(6), the petitioner-respondent-petitioner and the GAL may not raise or argue issues not set forth in the petitions for review unless otherwise ordered by the court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following briefing schedule be followed in this case: 1. Both the State of Wisconsin and the GAL shall serve and file their respective briefs in this court within 30 days of the date of this order; 2. Respondent-appellant, A.G., (as respondent) shall within 20 days of filing serve and file its response to the State of Wisconsin and GAL's briefs; 3. Both the State of Wisconsin and the GAL shall within 10 days of filing serve and file their reply, if any, to the other party's response to their briefs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in any brief filed in this court the parties shall not incorporate by reference any portion of their court of appeals' brief of petition for review or response; instead, any material in these documents upon which there is reliance should be restated in the brief filed in this court; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the first briefs filed in this court must contain, as part of the appendix, a copy of the decision of the court of appeals in this case; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if a party has not previously filed an electronic copy of the briefs filed on behalf of that party in the court of appeals, the party, within 30 days after the date of this order, must provide the clerk of this court with 10 copies of the brief or briefs previously filed on behalf of that party in the court of appeals; but if the party has already filed an electronic copy of such briefs, then there is no obligation to provide additional copies of those briefs to the clerk of this court; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the allowance of costs, if any, in connection with the granting o Comment: GAL |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-08-2022
|
Fee Waived
|
|
|
Comment: State filed
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-08-2022
|
Certificate of Filing by Mail
|
|
|
Comment: re: PRE
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-08-2022
|
Petition for Review
|
|
|
Filed By: Katie Gutowski
Submit Date: 8-22-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 10-11-2022 IT IS ORDERED that both petitions are granted and that pursuant to Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.62(6), the petitioner-respondent-petitioner and the GAL may not raise or argue issues not set forth in the petitions for review unless otherwise ordered by the court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following briefing schedule be followed in this case: 1. Both the State of Wisconsin and the GAL shall serve and file their respective briefs in this court within 30 days of the date of this order; 2. Respondent-appellant, A.G., (as respondent) shall within 20 days of filing serve and file its response to the State of Wisconsin and GAL's briefs; 3. Both the State of Wisconsin and the GAL shall within 10 days of filing serve and file their reply, if any, to the other party's response to their briefs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in any brief filed in this court the parties shall not incorporate by reference any portion of their court of appeals' brief of petition for review or response; instead, any material in these documents upon which there is reliance should be restated in the brief filed in this court; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the first briefs filed in this court must contain, as part of the appendix, a copy of the decision of the court of appeals in this case; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if a party has not previously filed an electronic copy of the briefs filed on behalf of that party in the court of appeals, the party, within 30 days after the date of this order, must provide the clerk of this court with 10 copies of the brief or briefs previously filed on behalf of that party in the court of appeals; but if the party has already filed an electronic copy of such briefs, then there is no obligation to provide additional copies of those briefs to the clerk of this court; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the allowance of costs, if any, in connection with the |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-12-2022
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Donald
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Reversed and remanded Pages: 9 Order Text: Orders reversed and cause remanded with directions |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-15-2022
|
Briefs Sent to District
|
|
|
Comment: Reply Brief
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-15-2022
|
Reply Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Christopher Sobic
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-02-2022
|
Briefs Sent to District
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-01-2022
|
Brief of Guardian ad Litem
|
|
|
Filed By: Courtney R
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-27-2022
|
Briefs Sent to District
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-27-2022
|
Brief of Respondent(s)
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-16-2022
|
Record and Briefs Sent to District 1
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-16-2022
|
Brief & Appx of Appellant(s)
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-05-2022
|
Sealed Documents
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-05-2022
|
Record
|
|
|
Comment: ELECTRONICALLY FILED
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-21-2022
|
Statement on Transcript
|
|
|
Filed By: Christopher Sobic
Status: Prev. Filed |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-20-2022
|
Notice of Docketing of Appeal
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-20-2022
|
Termination of Parental Rights
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-20-2022
|
Fee Waived
|
|
|
Comment: SPD
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-20-2022
|
Notice of Appeal filed in Cir. Ct.
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-20-2022
|
Notice of Appeal & Court Record
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-30-2022
|
Order of Circuit Court
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-15-2021
|
Order of Circuit Court
|
|