Artillis Mitchell v. Chris S. Buesgen
Appeal Number 2022AP001076
Court of Appeals District 4
CASE HISTORY
|
Status
|
Court
|
Filing Date
|
Anticipated Due Date
|
Activity
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-11-2024
|
Remittitur
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-10-2024
|
Final Publication
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
04-01-2024
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Karla Keckhaver
Submit Date: 4-1-2024 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 4-4-2024 IT IS ORDERED that the motion is granted. Respondents-respondents' response shall be served and filed on or before May 6, 2024. Comment: Motion to Extend Time to File Response to Petition for Review |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-27-2024
|
Opinion Ordered Published
|
|
|
Comment: Opinion Ordered Published - Decision & Order
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-27-2024
|
Public Domain Citation
|
|
|
Comment: PDC No: 2024 WI App 14
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-25-2024
|
Fee Paid
|
|
|
Comment: Invoice No: 20933; Receipt No: 24R 000748
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-25-2024
|
Invoice Issued
|
|
|
Comment: Invoice No: 20933
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-22-2024
|
Order
|
|
|
IT IS ORDERED that unless within ten (10) days of the date of this order, the filing fee is received by the clerk of the supreme court, the action will be subject to dismissal under Rule 809.83.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-22-2024
|
||
|
Filed By: Douglas Raines
Submit Date: 5-7-2024 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 9-11-2024 IT IS ORDERED that the petition for review is denied, without costs. REBECCA FRANK DALLET, J., dissents. Motion Response Filed By: Karla Keckhaver Submit Date: 5-7-2024 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-22-2024
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Blanchard, Kloppenburg, Graham
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Affirmed Pages: 25 Written by: Blanchard, Brian W. Order Text: Order affirmed. Comment: Opinion/Decision |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-16-2024
|
Briefs Sent to District
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-16-2024
|
Reply Brief
Reply Brief |
|
|
Filed By: Douglas Raines
Comment: Replacement |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-08-2023
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Douglas Raines
Submit Date: 12-8-2023 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 12-12-2023 IT IS ORDERED that the time to file a reply brief is extended to January 16, 2024. See BRY event due on 1-16-2024 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-20-2023
|
Brief of Respondent(s)
Brief of Respondent |
|
|
Filed By: Karla Keckhaver
Comment: Replacement |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-01-2023
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Douglas Raines
Submit Date: 11-2-2023 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 11-6-2023 IT IS ORDERED that the time to file the respondents brief is extended to November 20, 2023. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time to file the reply brief is extended to December 20, 2023. Comment: Motion to Extend Time (BRY) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-09-2023
|
Brief & Appendix of Appellant(s)
Replacement Brief of Appellant |
|
|
Filed By: Douglas Raines
Comment: Replacment |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-18-2023
|
Supplement to Record
|
|
|
Comment: Document 7 and Document 11
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-12-2023
|
Motion to Correct/Supplement Record
|
|
|
Filed By: Emily Stedman
Submit Date: 9-12-2023 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 9-13-2023 IT IS ORDERED that the motion to supplement the record is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within five days of the date of this order, the appellants counsel shall submit to the clerk of the circuit court Document 7 and Document 11 described above, if the documents are not already a part of the circuit court record. A copy of the documents may be submitted rather than the originals. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within eleven days of the date of this order, the clerk of the circuit court shall transmit Document 7 and Document 11 by supplemental return. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in order to accommodate supplementation of the record, the time to file the appellants brief is extended through October 13, 2023. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-24-2023
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Emily Stedman
Submit Date: 8-24-2023 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 8-28-2023 IT IS ORDERED that the time to file the appellants brief is extended to September 27, 2023. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefs previously filed in this case are stricken. See BAP event due on 9-27-2023 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-17-2023
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Douglas Raines as co-counsel for Artillis Mitchell
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-17-2023
|
Response
|
|
|
Comment: Both pro bono counsel shall file a notice of appearance and the completed Consent to Representation form; Notice of Appearance for Douglas Raines received 7-17-2023
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-17-2023
|
Hold Status
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-22-2023
|
Order
|
|
|
IT IS ORDERED that Attorneys Douglas M. Raines and Emily Logan Stedman are hereby appointed as pro bono counsel to represent appellant Artillis Mitchell in the present appeal, if Mitchell consents to such representation.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by July 17, 2023, pro bono counsel shall file a notice of appearance and the completed Consent to Representation form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a new appellants brief shall be filed within forty days from the date that the Consent to Representation form is filed with the court of appeals, and the new respondents brief and new reply brief shall be filed pursuant to the deadlines outlined in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-22-2023
|
Response
|
|
|
Comment: Attorney Goldschmidt to identify pro bono attorney
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-19-2023
|
Order
|
|
|
IT IS ORDERED that the appeal is stayed while the court awaits the identification of an attorney willing to provide pro bono appellate representation to appellant Artillis Mitchell and the filing of new briefs.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Attorney James Goldschmidt, the coordinator for the pro bono program of the State Bar of Wisconsin's Appellate Practice Section, shall make every effort to identify a pro bono attorney within twenty-one days of the date of this order and report the name of that attorney to the court. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-11-2023
|
Submitted on Briefs
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-27-2023
|
Record and Briefs Sent to District 4
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-27-2023
|
Reply Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Artillis Mitchell
Comment: BRIEF STRICKEN, PER 8-28-2023 COURT ORDER |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-03-2023
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Artillis Mitchell
Submit Date: 3-3-2023 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 3-6-2023 IT IS ORDERED that the time to file the reply brief is extended to April 7, 2023. See BRY event due on 4-7-2023 Comment: Motion to Extend Time (BRY 2) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-09-2023
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Artillis Mitchell
Submit Date: 1-9-2023 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-10-2023 IT IS ORDERED that the time to file the reply brief is extended to March 5, 2023. See BRY event due on 3-5-2023 Comment: Motion to Extend Time (BRY) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-21-2022
|
Brief of Respondent(s)
|
|
|
Filed By: Karla Keckhaver
Comment: BRIEF STRICKEN, PER 8-28-2023 COURT ORDER |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-28-2022
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: AAG Karla Keckhaver for the Respondents
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-22-2022
|
Brief & Appendix of Appellant(s)
|
|
|
Comment: BRIEF STRICKEN, PER 8-28-2023 COURT ORDER
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-23-2022
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Artillis Mitchell
Submit Date: 10-12-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 10-13-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the time to file the appellants brief is extended to November 14, 2022. See BAP event due on 11-14-2022 Comment: Motion to Extend Time (BAP) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-31-2022
|
Record
|
|
|
Comment: ELECTRONICALLY FILED
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-08-2022
|
Statement on Transcript
|
|
|
Filed By: Artillis
Status Mitchell: Not Needed |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-28-2022
|
Notice of Docketing of Appeal
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-28-2022
|
Indigency Forms Sent
|
|
|
Filed By: Unassigned District 4
Submit Date: 7-18-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 7-18-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the court grants permission to proceed without payment of the filing fee. This order waives only the filing fees in the Court of Appeals. It is not a determination of indigency for any other purpose. Indigency may be reevaluated if a request is received for waiver of other fees based on indigency. Motion Response Filed By: Artillis Mitchell Submit Date: 7-18-2022 Comment: Petition for Waiver of Fees/Costs |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-28-2022
|
Rules of Appellate Procedure and Pro Se Guide Sent
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-28-2022
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Copy of Circuit Court Docket
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-28-2022
|
Notice of Appeal filed in Circuit Court
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-28-2022
|
Notice of Appeal & Circuit Court Docket Entries
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-20-2022
|
Order of Circuit Court
|
|