State v. B. W.
Appeal Number 2022AP001329
CONFIDENTIAL
Court of Appeals District 1
CASE HISTORY
Status
|
Court
|
Filing Date
|
Anticipated Due Date
|
Activity
|
PEND
|
CA
|
Awaiting Assignment
|
||
PEND
|
CA
|
10-12-2023
|
Remittitur
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-12-2023
|
||
Judge Panel: Donald
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Affirmed Pages: 12 Order Text: Order affirmed Comment: Opinion/Decision |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-22-2023
|
Briefs Sent to District
|
|
Comment: Appellant's Supplemental Reply BOT per CTO of 7/6/23
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-22-2023
|
Other Brief
|
|
Filed By: Christopher Sobic
Comment: Supplemental Reply Brief per CTO of 7/6/23 |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-15-2023
|
Briefs Sent to District
|
|
Comment: GAL's BOT
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-15-2023
|
Other Brief
|
|
Filed By: Courtney R
Comment: Supplemental Brief of Guardian ad Litem |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-10-2023
|
Other Brief
|
|
Filed By: Katie Gutowski
Comment: Supplemental Brief of Respondent per CTO of 7/6/23 |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-26-2023
|
Briefs Sent to District
|
|
Comment: Appellant's BOT per CTO of 7/6/23
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-26-2023
|
Other Brief
|
|
Filed By: Christopher Sobic
Comment: Supplemental Brief of Appellant per CTO of 7/6/23 |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-06-2023
|
Court Order
|
|
IT IS ORDERED that the appellant shall file its supplemental brief within 20 days of the date of this court's order. The brief shall not exceed 10 pages in length.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the respondents shall file their supplemental brief within 20 days of the filing of the appellant's supplemental brief. The brief shall not exceed 10 pages in length. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appellant may file a supplemental reply brief within 15 days of the filing of the respondents' supplemental brief. The brief shall not exceed 5 pages in length. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal remains on hold pending completion of supplemental briefing. |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-05-2023
|
Sua Sponte
|
|
Filed By: Unassigned District 1
Submit Date: 7-5-2023 Decision: (N) No Action Decision Date: 7-5-2023 No action - hold lifted. Comment: Review of LTR filed by ASPD Sobic 7/5/23. |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-05-2023
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
Comment: Letter from ASPD Sobic informing court that a SC decision was issued in 22AP652 on 6/30/23.
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-05-2023
|
Hold Status
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-22-2023
|
Court Order
|
|
IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is stayed pending the Wisconsin Supreme Court's decision in State v. A.G., No. 2022AP652.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the appellant shall notify this court by letter within fifteen days of the date A.G. is decided. |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-15-2023
|
Briefs Sent to District
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-15-2023
|
Reply Brief
|
|
Filed By: Christopher Sobic
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-07-2023
|
Briefs Sent to District
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-07-2023
|
Brief of Guardian ad Litem
|
|
Filed By: Courtney R
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-06-2023
|
Briefs Sent to District
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-06-2023
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
Comment: The Appendix Cover contains an incorrect Appeal Number.
The Appendix Cover contains an incorrect case caption. The caption should read:
In re the termination of parental rights to B. W., a person under the age of 18:
State of Wisconsin,
Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
B. W.,
Respondent-Appellant.
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-06-2023
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
Comment: The Brief Cover contains an incorrect Appeal Number.
The Brief Cover contains an incorrect case caption. The caption should read:
In re the termination of parental rights to B. W., a person under the age of 18:
State of Wisconsin,
Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
B. W.,
Respondent-Appellant.
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-06-2023
|
Brief of Respondent(s)
|
|
Filed By: Katie Gutowski
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-22-2023
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
Comment: Atty. Roelandts appearing as GAL.
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-21-2023
|
Record and Briefs Sent to District 1
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-21-2023
|
Brief & Appx of Appellant(s)
|
|
Filed By: Christopher Sobic
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-06-2023
|
Record
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-20-2023
|
Statement on Transcript
|
|
Filed By: Christopher Sobic
Status: Prev. Filed Comment: due date per cto 9/19/22 |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-18-2022
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
Filed By: Christopher Sobic
Submit Date: 11-18-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 11-21-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the deadline for the circuit court to decide the motion for post-disposition relief is extended until January 20, 2023. Comment: MXT to Decide Postdisposition Motion |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-19-2022
|
Record Remanded to Circuit Court
|
|
Comment: per cto 9/19/22
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-07-2022
|
Motion for Remand
|
|
Filed By: Christopher Sobic
Submit Date: 9-7-2022 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 9-19-2022 IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is remanded forthwith to the circuit court to permit B.W. to pursue a postdisposition motion. This court retains jurisdiction over the appeal during the remand period. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any postdisposition motion shall be filed within ten days of the date of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the circuit court shall conduct any necessary proceedings and enter an order containing its findings and conclusions resolving the postdisposition motion within sixty days of the date of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a transcript shall be ordered within three days after the hearing, if appellate counsel deems a transcript of the postdisposition proceedings necessary for appeal, and any such transcript shall be served and filed within twenty days of the date it is ordered. Counsel for the appellant shall provide the court reporter with a copy of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a statement on transcript shall be filed by appellate counsel within five days of the date of the hearing, reflecting either that a postdisposition transcript has been ordered or that such a transcript is not necessary for this appeal. The appellant shall file the statement on transcript with the clerk of circuit court, who shall transmit the statement on transcript to the clerk of the court of appeals within three days after its filing. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.107(5)(d). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of circuit court shall retransmit the record to this court within ten days of the later of the entry of the circuit court order resolving the postdisposition motion or the filing of the transcript of the postdisposition motion hearing if such transcript is ordered. The record shall include documents, including transcripts, filed pursuant to this remand, and the circuit courts order resolving the postdisposition motion. See WI Comment: w/ affidavit in support |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-23-2022
|
Record
|
|
Comment: ELECTRONICALLY FILED
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-11-2022
|
Statement on Transcript
|
|
Filed By: Christopher Sobic
Status: Prev. Filed |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-08-2022
|
Fee Waived
|
|
Comment: SPD filed
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-08-2022
|
Termination of Parental Rights
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-08-2022
|
Notice of Docketing of Appeal
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-08-2022
|
Notice of Appeal filed in Cir. Ct.
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-08-2022
|
Notice of Appeal & Court Record
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-08-2022
|
X Transfer
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-22-2022
|
MXT to file NAP/Postdisposition motion
|
|
Filed By: Christopher Sobic
Submit Date: 7-22-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 7-25-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the deadline for B.W. to file a notice of appeal in this matter is extended to August 8, 2022. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within five days of the date of this order, Attorneys Katie L. Gutowski and Anne M. Abell shall either opt in to participate in the Court of Appeals electronic filing system for this case or provide this court with an explanation for not doing so. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.801. |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-14-2022
|
Order of Circuit Court
|
|