Josh Kaul v. Joel Urmanski, as DA for Sheboygan County, WI
Appeal Number 2023AP002362
Supreme Court
CASE HISTORY
|
Status
|
Court
|
Filing Date
|
Anticipated Due Date
|
Activity
|
|
PEND
|
SC
|
Awaiting Opinion/Decision
|
||
|
PEND
|
SC
|
Awaiting Assignment
|
||
|
PEND
|
CA
|
02-27-2024
|
Brief & Appendix of Appellant(s)
|
|
|
Comment: stayed per 2/22/24 CTO
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-11-2024
|
Oral Argument
|
|
|
Comment: 9:45 a.m. (State Capitol, Supreme Court Hearing Room); Matthew J. Thome for Defendent-Appellant, Hannah S. Jurss for Plaintiffs-Respondents, Diane Welsh for Intervenors-Respondents, Samuel J. Leib for Defendent-Respondent(John T. Chrisholm), Carly Gerards for Defendent-Respondent(Ismael R. Ozanne)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-14-2024
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Douglas Poland
Submit Date: 10-14-2024 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 10-21-2024 IT IS ORDERED that the motion is granted. Oral argument time for the oral argument on November 11, 2024, shall be allocated as follows. D.A. Urmanski shall present argument first and shall be granted a total of 50 minutes of argument time. D.A. Urmanski may reserve up to ten minutes of his argument time for rebuttal. Plaintiffs-respondents, Attorney General Josh Kaul, the Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services, the Wisconsin Medical Examining Board, and Clarence P. Chou, M.D., shall be granted 20 minutes of argument time. Intervenors-respondents shall be granted 20 minutes of argument time. D.A. Chisholm shall be granted five minutes of argument time. D.A. Ozanne shall be granted five minutes of argument time. Rebuttal by D.A. Urmanski shall follow argument by D.A. Ozanne. Comment: Motion for Additional Oral Argument Time |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-30-2024
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Returned Mail - Acknowledgement of Filing of Brief
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-30-2024
|
Reply Brief-Supreme Court
Reply Brief (Joel Urmanski) |
|
|
Filed By: Matthew Thome
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-26-2024
|
Assigned for Oral Argument
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-20-2024
|
Sua Sponte
|
|
|
Filed By: Elizabeth Pierson
Submit Date: 9-24-2024 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 9-24-2024 IT IS ORDERED that the motion is granted. Intervenor Physicians' amended response brief, electronically submitted on September 20, 2024, is accepted as filed. Comment: Letter re Correction to Brief (Physicians) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-20-2024
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Matthew Thome
Submit Date: 9-20-2024 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 9-24-2024 IT IS ORDERED that the motion is granted. Defendant-appellant's reply brief shall be served and filed on or before September 30, 2024. See BR3 event due on 9-30-2024 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-19-2024
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae/Non-Party
Amicus/Non-Party Brief (Local Elected Officials in Wisconsin) |
|
|
Filed By: Sarah Zylstra
Comment: Local Elected Officials in Wisconsin |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-19-2024
|
||
|
Filed By: Breanne Snapp
Comment: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Medical Association, the Wisconsin Medical Society, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-19-2024
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae/Non-Party
Amicus/Non-Party Brief (Association of Prosecuting Attorneys) |
|
|
Filed By: Tamar Kelber
Comment: Association of Prosecuting Attorneys |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-19-2024
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Notice of Pro Hac Vice Admission (Saharsky)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-19-2024
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Breanne Snapp
Submit Date: 9-19-2024 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 9-19-2024 IT IS ORDERED that the motions for leave to file non-party briefs are granted, and the proposed briefs submitted with the motions are accepted as filed; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to admit Attorneys Rosenthal and Singh of the Public Rights Project, and also to admit Attorneys Landers, Shrieves, Dale, Ruthberg, and Beckwith of Proskauer Rose LLP, is granted. Attorneys appearing pro hac vice must satisfy the requirements of Supreme Court Rule 10.03(4). Comment: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Medical Association, the Wisconsin Medical Society, and the Society for Maternal-FetalMedicine |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-18-2024
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Sarah Zylstra
Submit Date: 9-19-2024 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 9-19-2024 IT IS ORDERED that the motions for leave to file non-party briefs are granted, and the proposed briefs submitted with the motions are accepted as filed; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to admit Attorneys Rosenthal and Singh of the Public Rights Project, and also to admit Attorneys Landers, Shrieves, Dale, Ruthberg, and Beckwith of Proskauer Rose LLP, is granted. Attorneys appearing pro hac vice must satisfy the requirements of Supreme Court Rule 10.03(4). Comment: Local Elected Officials in Wisconsin |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-18-2024
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Attorney Zylstra for Council Member Cassi Benedict, City Councilor Aaron Brewster, Mayor Mitchel Craig, Luke Diaz, City Councilor Larry Mboga, and Mayor Satya Rhodes-Conway
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-18-2024
|
Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
|
|
|
Filed By: Sarah Zylstra
Submit Date: 9-19-2024 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 9-19-2024 IT IS ORDERED that the motions for leave to file non-party briefs are granted, and the proposed briefs submitted with the motions are accepted as filed; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to admit Attorneys Rosenthal and Singh of the Public Rights Project, and also to admit Attorneys Landers, Shrieves, Dale, Ruthberg, and Beckwith of Proskauer Rose LLP, is granted. Attorneys appearing pro hac vice must satisfy the requirements of Supreme Court Rule 10.03(4). |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-18-2024
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Tamar Kelber
Submit Date: 9-18-2024 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 9-19-2024 IT IS ORDERED that the motions for leave to file non-party briefs are granted, and the proposed briefs submitted with the motions are accepted as filed; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to admit Attorneys Rosenthal and Singh of the Public Rights Project, and also to admit Attorneys Landers, Shrieves, Dale, Ruthberg, and Beckwith of Proskauer Rose LLP, is granted. Attorneys appearing pro hac vice must satisfy the requirements of Supreme Court Rule 10.03(4). Comment: Association of Prosecuting Attorneys |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-13-2024
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Letter re Counsel of Record (Zylstra)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-11-2024
|
Response Brief-Supreme Court
Amended Response Brief- Supreme Court (Physicians) Response Brief- Supreme Court (Physicians) |
|
|
Filed By: Diane Welsh
Comment: Christopher J. Ford, Kristin J. Lyerly and Jennifer J. McIntosh (Physicians) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-11-2024
|
Response Brief-Supreme Court
Response Brief- Supreme Court (Ismael R. Ozanne) |
|
|
Filed By: Douglas Poland
Comment: Ismael R. Ozanne |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-11-2024
|
Response Brief-Supreme Court
Response Brief- Supreme Court (John T. Chisholm) |
|
|
Filed By: Samuel Leib
Comment: John T. Chisholm |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-11-2024
|
||
|
Filed By: Hannah Jurss
Comment: Josh Kaul, Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services, Wisconsin Medical Examining Board and Clarence P. Chou, MD |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-10-2024
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Attorney Pawlisch for Ismael Ozanne
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-15-2024
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Attorney Hipsman for Plaintiffs-Respondents
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-13-2024
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Attorney Pierson for Intervenors-Respondents
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-12-2024
|
First Brief-Supreme Court
Brief of Appellant |
|
|
Filed By: Matthew Thome
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-17-2024
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Attorney Gibson for Plaintiffs-Respondents
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-02-2024
|
Court Changed to Supreme Court
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-02-2024
|
Hold Status
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-30-2024
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Notice of Withdrawal (Murphy)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-12-2024
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae/Non-Party
Amicus Brief of Wisconsin Right to Life in Response to Petition to Bypass |
|
|
Filed By: Luke Berg
Comment: Wisconsin Right to Life, Wisconsin Family Action, and Pro-Life Wisconsin |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-12-2024
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Attorney Berg for Proposed Intervenors Wisconsin Right to Life, Wisconsin Family Action,
and Pro-Life Wisconsin
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-12-2024
|
||
|
Filed By: Luke Berg
Submit Date: 3-12-2024 Decision: (O) Other Decision Date: 7-2-2024 IT IS ORDERED that defendant-appellant's petition to bypass is granted, the appeal is accepted for consideration in this court, and the defendant-appellant may not raise or argue issues not set forth in the petition to bypass unless otherwise ordered by the court; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that District Attorneys Ismael R. Ozanne and John T. Chisolm shall be designated as defendants-respondents on appeal; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the State Plaintiffs' supplemental petition to bypass is denied, and the parties' briefs in this case should not address whether the Wisconsin Constitution contains a right to obtain a consensual medical abortion; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Proposed Intervenors' conditional motion to intervene is denied, but their alternative motion for leave to file a non-party brief amici curiae in response to the supplemental petition to bypass is granted, and the proposed brief in response to the supplemental petition to bypass is accepted for filing and has been considered by the court; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within 40 days of the date of this order, defendant-appellant must file a brief in this court, and within 30 days of filing all parties to the case wishing to respond must file separate response briefs. Each principal brief shall not exceed 70 pages if a monospaced font is used or 15,400 words if a proportional serif font is used. Within 10 days of filing of the response briefs, the defendant-appellant must file either a single reply brief or a statement that no reply brief will be filed. The reply brief shall not exceed 20 pages if a monospaced font is used or 4,400 words if a proportional serif font is used; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any non-party that wishes to file a non-party brief amicus curiae relating to the issues listed in the petition to bypass must file a motion for leave of the court to file a non-party Comment: Conditional Motion to Intervene of Wisconsin Right to Life, Wisconsin Family Action, and Pro-Life Wisconsin |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-26-2024
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Attorney Samuel J. Leib as Counsel for John T. Chisolm
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-22-2024
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Attorney Westerberg for Intervenors-Respondents
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-21-2024
|
Fee Paid
|
|
|
Comment: Invoice No: 20897; Receipt No: 24R 000437
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-21-2024
|
Invoice Issued
|
|
|
Comment: Invoice No: 20897; Petition to Bypass
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-20-2024
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Notice of Withdrawal (Curtis)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
02-20-2024
|
Order
|
|
|
IT IS ORDERED that unless within ten (10) days of the date of this order, the filing fee is received by the clerk of the supreme court, the action will be subject to dismissal under Rule 809.83.
Comment: 2-20-2024 Court Order |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
02-20-2024
|
Petition to Bypass
|
|
|
Filed By: Matthew Thome
Submit Date: 2-20-2024 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 7-2-2024 IT IS ORDERED that defendant-appellant's petition to bypass is granted, the appeal is accepted for consideration in this court, and the defendant-appellant may not raise or argue issues not set forth in the petition to bypass unless otherwise ordered by the court; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that District Attorneys Ismael R. Ozanne and John T. Chisolm shall be designated as defendants-respondents on appeal; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the State Plaintiffs' supplemental petition to bypass is denied, and the parties' briefs in this case should not address whether the Wisconsin Constitution contains a right to obtain a consensual medical abortion; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Proposed Intervenors' conditional motion to intervene is denied, but their alternative motion for leave to file a non-party brief amici curiae in response to the supplemental petition to bypass is granted, and the proposed brief in response to the supplemental petition to bypass is accepted for filing and has been considered by the court; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within 40 days of the date of this order, defendant-appellant must file a brief in this court, and within 30 days of filing all parties to the case wishing to respond must file separate response briefs. Each principal brief shall not exceed 70 pages if a monospaced font is used or 15,400 words if a proportional serif font is used. Within 10 days of filing of the response briefs, the defendant-appellant must file either a single reply brief or a statement that no reply brief will be filed. The reply brief shall not exceed 20 pages if a monospaced font is used or 4,400 words if a proportional serif font is used; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any non-party that wishes to file a non-party brief amicus curiae relating to the issues listed in the petition to bypass must file a motion for leave of the court to file a |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-20-2024
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Matthew Thome
Submit Date: 2-20-2024 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 2-22-2024 IT IS ORDERED that the motion to stay briefing is granted. In the event that the Wisconsin Supreme Court denies the appellants petition to bypass, the appellant's brief will be due fourteen days after the date of denial. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within five days of the date of this order, Attorneys Aaron Douglas Birnbaum, Brenden M. Leib, Carly Gerads and Clementine Uwabera shall either opt in to participate in the Court of Appeals electronic filing system for this case or provide this court with an explanation for not doing so. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.801. See BAP event due on 2-27-2024 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
02-02-2024
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Notice of Withdrawal of Attorney Leslie A. Freehill
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-18-2024
|
Record
|
|
|
Comment: ELECTRONICALLY FILED
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-29-2023
|
Statement on Transcript
|
|
|
Filed By: Matthew Thome
Status: Prev. Filed |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-20-2023
|
Fee Paid
|
|
|
Comment: Receipt No: 23R 003140
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-20-2023
|
Notice of Docketing of Appeal
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-20-2023
|
Transfer to District II
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-20-2023
|
Transfer District Designation
|
|
|
Comment: District II
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-20-2023
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Letter to Clerk re Appeal Venue
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-20-2023
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Copy of Circuit Court Docket
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-20-2023
|
Notice of Appeal & Circuit Court Docket Entries
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-20-2023
|
Docketing Statement from Appellant
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-19-2023
|
Notice of Appeal filed in Circuit Court
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-05-2023
|
Order of Circuit Court
|
|