PEND

SC

02-05-2026

Other Brief

Comment: Reply Brief of BNO Statement

PEND

SC

01-02-2026

Other Brief

Comment: Petitioner Brief or BNO Statement

OCCD

SC

10-07-2025

Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
NON-PARTY BRIEF OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS UNION IN OPPOSITION TO VOCES DE LA FRONTERA, INC.'S PETITION TO THE SUPREME COURT TO TAKE JURISIDCTION OF AN ORIGINAL ACTION
APPENDIX TO NON-PARTY BRIEF OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS UNION IN OPPOSITION TO VOCES DE LA FRONTERA, INC.'S PETITION TO THE SUPREME COURT TO TAKE JURISIDCTION OF AN ORIGINAL ACTION

Filed By: Nicholas Boerke
Submit Date: 10-7-2025
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 10-9-2025
IT IS ORDERED that the motion for pro hac vice admission of Attorney Courtland L. Culver is granted. A copy of SCR 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, can be found at the following link: https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/rules/chap10.pdf. A copy of SCR 10.03(4) is also attached to the newly admitted pro hac vice attorneys copy of this order; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to file a non-party brief amicus curiae is granted, and the non-party brief is accepted for filing.
Comment: American Constitutional Rights Union (ACRU)

OCCD

SC

10-07-2025

Response

Comment: response to petition as ordered 9/23/25

OCCD

SC

10-01-2025

Notice of Appearance

Comment: Hentges (Sheriff Respondents except Meister)

OCCD

SC

09-29-2025

Notice of Appearance

OCCD

SC

09-26-2025

Notice of Appearance

Comment: Thome (Resp Meister)

OCCD

SC

09-23-2025

Order

IT IS ORDERED that the respondents, Sheriff Dave Gerber et al., are directed to file a response to the petition for leave to commence an original action on or before October 7, 2025. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any non-party that wishes to file a non-party brief amicus curiae in support of or in opposition to the petition must file a motion for leave of the court to file a non-party brief pursuant to the requirements of Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.19(7). Non-parties should also consult this courts Internal Operating Procedure concerning the nature of non-parties who may be granted leave to file a non-party brief. A proposed non-party brief must accompany the motion for leave to file it. Any proposed non-party brief shall not exceed 20 pages if a monospaced font is used or 4,400 words if a proportional serif font is used. Any motion for leave with the proposed non-party brief attached shall be filed on or before October 7, 2025. Any submission by a non-party that does not comply with Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.19(7) and any proposed non-party brief for which this court does not grant leave will not be considered by the court; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all Wisconsin attorneys participating in this case must each opt in to this case in the appellate court electronic filing system. All Wisconsin attorneys who are not already opted in for this case are hereby ordered to do so as soon as possible and no later than September 30, 2025.

OCCD

SC

09-19-2025

Notice of Appearance

Comment: Cox (petitioner)

OCCD

SC

09-19-2025

Fee Paid

Comment: Receipt No: 25R 002501

OCCD

SC

09-18-2025

Petition for an Original Action
Respondents Joint Response to Petition For Original Action

Filed By: R. Timothy Muth
Submit Date: 9-18-2025
Decision: (G) Grant
Decision Date: 12-3-2025
ORD that the POA is granted, this court assumes jurisdiction over this entire action, and the petitioner may not raise or argue issues not set forth in the petition for leave to commence an original action except as otherwise ordered below by this court; and FRO that w/in 30 days after the date of this order the petitioner must file a brief in this court; that w/in 20 days of filing the respondents mustfile either a joint response brief or a statement that no brief will be filed; and that if a brief is filed by the respondents, w/in 10 days of filing the petitioner must file either a reply brief or a statement that no reply brief will be filed. The form, length, pagination,appendix, and certification requirements shall be the same as those governing standard appellate briefing in this court. See Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.19, 809.63; and FRO that the parties briefs shall include a discussion of the following issues: 1. Does WIS. STAT. ch. 818 govern the authority of a sheriff to make a civil arrest only in civil actions pending in WI courts, or do these provisions additionally circumscribe a sheriffs authority to make a civil arrest pursuant to a federal immigration detainer; and 2. What impact, if any, does a sheriffs entry into a formal agreement with the federal govt pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1357(g)(1)commonly referred to as a 287(g) agreement have on the issue stated in the Issue Presented section of the oap, paying particular attention to the statutory phrase consistent with State and local law in 8 U.S.C. 1357(g)(1); and 3. What impact, if any, does the fact that a sheriffs dept participates in immigration enforcement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1357(g)(10), w/out a 287(g) agreement, have on the issue stated in the Issue Presented section of the oap; and FRO that any non-party that wishes to file a non-party brief amicus curiae must file a motion for le
Comment: ANNETTE KINGSLAND ZIEGLER, J. and REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J. dissent. BRIAN K. HAGEDORN, J., writing separately.