State v. Tyler T.
Appeal Number 2010AP000784
CONFIDENTIAL
Supreme Court
CASE HISTORY
Status
|
Court
|
Filing Date
|
Anticipated Due Date
|
Activity
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
06-28-2012
|
Remittitur
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
05-22-2012
|
Cites
|
|
341 Wis. 2d 1
|
||||
OCCD
|
SC
|
05-22-2012
|
Cites
|
|
814 N.W.2d 192
|
||||
OCCD
|
SC
|
05-22-2012
|
||
Judge Panel: Abrahamson, Bradley, Crooks, Prosser, Roggensack, Ziegler, Gableman
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Affirmed Pages: 28 Written by: Ziegler, Annette K. Abrahamson, Shirley S. Joined Dissenting Opinion Bradley, Ann Walsh Wrote Dissenting Opinion 9 pages. Prosser, David T. Jr. Took No Part Order Text: The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed. |
||||
OCCD
|
SC
|
05-21-2012
|
Public Domain Citation
|
|
Comment: PDC No: 2012 WI 52
|
||||
OCCD
|
SC
|
02-01-2012
|
Supplement to Record
|
|
Comment: 22-1 to 22-6
|
||||
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-12-2012
|
Oral Argument
|
|
Comment: 1st case, 9:45 a.m., Atty. Susan E. Alesia counsel for Res-App-Pet and Atty. Zeke Wiedenfeld counsel for Pla-Res.
|
||||
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-03-2012
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
Comment: from ADA Wiedenfeld; advising court of technical misstatement in brief
|
||||
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-23-2011
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-17-2011
|
Reply Brief-Supreme Court
|
|
Filed By: Susan Alesia
|
||||
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-02-2011
|
Response Brief-Supreme Court
|
|
Filed By: Zeke Wiedenfeld
|
||||
OCCD
|
SC
|
11-01-2011
|
Assigned-Oral Argument
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
10-13-2011
|
First Brief-Supreme Court
|
|
Filed By: Susan Alesia
Comment: Appx of First Brief-Supreme Court |
||||
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-13-2011
|
Caption Amended
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-13-2011
|
Court Changed to Supreme Court
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
05-24-2011
|
Court Order
|
|
ORD that the petitioner-respondent, State of Wisconsin, is directed to file a response to the petition for review on or before 6/7/11.
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-31-2011
|
Cites
|
|
331 Wis. 2d 489
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-31-2011
|
Cites
|
|
795 N.W.2d 64
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
01-31-2011
|
Opinion Ordered Unpublished
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-24-2011
|
Fee Waived
|
|
Comment: SPD
|
||||
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-24-2011
|
Petition for Review
|
|
Filed By: Susan Alesia
Submit Date: 2-16-2011 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 9-13-2011 ORD that the petition for review is granted. Briefs/statements due 30/20/10. Motion Response Filed By: Zeke Wiedenfeld Submit Date: 6-6-2011 Comment: State shall file response by 6/7/11 per 5/24/11 CTO |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-29-2010
|
||
Judge Panel: Reilly
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Affirmed Pages: 7 Order Text: Order affirmed. |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-29-2010
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-12-2010
|
Submitted on Briefs
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-11-2010
|
Record and Briefs Sent to District 2
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-10-2010
|
Reply Brief
|
|
Filed By: Susan Alesia
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-25-2010
|
Brief of Respondent(s)
|
|
Filed By: Zeke Wiedenfeld
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-15-2010
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
Filed By: Zeke Wiedenfeld
Submit Date: 10-18-2010 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 10-19-2010 ORD that the time for the respondent to file its brief is extended to October 25, 2010. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.82(2)(a) (2007-08). See BRS event due on 10-25-2010 |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-12-2010
|
Delinquent
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-27-2010
|
Brief & Appx of Appellant(s)
|
|
Filed By: Susan Alesia
|
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-20-2010
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
Filed By: Susan Alesia
Submit Date: 8-23-2010 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 8-24-2010 ORD that the time permitted the appellant for filing his brief and appendix is extended to August 27, 2010. See BAP event due on 8-27-2010 |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-21-2010
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
Filed By: Susan Alesia
Submit Date: 7-22-2010 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 7-23-2010 ORD that the time permitted the appellant for filing his brief and appendix is extended to 8/20/10. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.82(2)(a) (2007-08). See BAP event due on 8-20-2010 |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-21-2010
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
Filed By: Susan Alesia
Submit Date: 6-21-2010 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 6-23-2010 ORD that the time for the appellant to file his appellant's brief is extended to 7/21/10. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.82(2)(a) (2007-08). See BAP event due on 7-21-2010 |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
05-11-2010
|
Record
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-30-2010
|
Received SPD Appointment Order
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-30-2010
|
Statement on Transcript
|
|
Filed By: Mary Burns
Status: Prev. Filed |
||||
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-29-2010
|
Delinquent
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-19-2010
|
Case to proceed under RAP
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-15-2010
|
Docketing Statement Submitted
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-15-2010
|
Response
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-14-2010
|
Response
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-14-2010
|
Docketing Statement from Appellant
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-13-2010
|
Notif. Sent-Filing of LVO & Court Record
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-13-2010
|
Copy of Order Granting Leave - from Cir. Ct.
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
04-09-2010
|
Copy of CTO Grtg. PLV Filed in Cir. Ct.
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-29-2010
|
Fee Waived
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-29-2010
|
Received SPD Appointment Order
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
03-29-2010
|
Petition for Leave to Appeal
|
|
Filed By: Mary Burns
Submit Date: 4-5-2010 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 4-8-2010 ORD the petition for leave to appeal is granted, without costs. The entry of this order has the effect of the filing of a notice of appeal. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.50(3). Therefore, the appellant shall file a docketing statement with the clerk of this court as required by Rule 809.10(1)(d) and 809.50(3). A copy of this order has been forwarded to the clerk of the circuit court. Pursuant to Rule 809.11(2), the clerk of the circuit court or responsible court official shall return the copy of the order granting this petition and the docket entries maintained pursuant to Wis. Stat. s. 59.40, to the clerk of this court within 3 days of receipt of the order. FRO that the parties shall have 10 days from the date of this order to advise us whether they desire an expedited briefing schedule. Generally, an appeal is appropriate for the expedited appeal calendar if it raises no more than three issues, the parties' briefs will not exceed fifteen pages in length and the briefs can be filed in a shorter time than normally allowed. FRO that this court will set the briefing schedule upon the filing of those responses. Motion Response Filed By: Zeke Wiedenfeld Submit Date: 4-5-2010 |
||||