John Doe 1 v. Madison Metro School District
Appeal Number 2020AP001032
Supreme Court
CASE HISTORY
|
Status
|
Court
|
Filing Date
|
Anticipated Due Date
|
Activity
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-23-2022
|
Remittitur
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-08-2022
|
Cites
|
|
|
403 Wis. 2d 369
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-08-2022
|
Cites
|
|
|
976 N.W.2d 584
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-08-2022
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Roggensack, Bradley, Ziegler, Bradley, Dallet, Hagedorn, Karofsky
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Affirmed and remanded Pages: 28 Written by: Hagedorn, Brian K. Roggensack, Patience Drake Wrote Dissenting Opinion 27 pages. Ziegler, Annette K. Joined Dissenting Opinion Bradley, Rebecca Grassl Joined Dissenting Opinion Order Text: The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed and the cause is remanded to the circuit court. Comment: Opinion/Decision - Supreme Court Opinion/Decision - Supreme Court |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
07-07-2022
|
Public Domain Citation
|
|
|
Comment: PDC No: 2022 WI 65
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
05-24-2022
|
Oral Argument
|
|
|
Comment: 11:00 a.m. (in the Capitol Hearing Room). Luke N. Berg for Plaintiff-Appellants-Petitioners. Sarah A. Zylstra for Defendant-Respondent. Adam R. Prinsen for Intervenors-Defendants-Respondents.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
05-06-2022
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: Returned mail
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
04-08-2022
|
Sua Sponte
|
|
|
Filed By: Unassigned District 4
Submit Date: 4-8-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 4-11-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the court will hear oral argument in this matter on Tuesday, May 24, 2022, beginning at 11:00 a.m., in the Supreme Court Hearing Room, 2nd Floor, East Wing of the State Capitol, Madison, Wisconsin. The oral argument on this date will not be adjourned. Each side will have 30 minutes of oral argument as follows: 25 Minutes Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners, John Doe 1, et al. By: Luke N. Berg, Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, Inc., Milwaukee, WI 15 Minutes Defendant-Respondent, Madison Metropolitan School District By: Sarah A. Zylstra, Boardman & Clark, LLP, Madison, WI 15 Minutes Intervenors-Defendants-Respondents, Gender Equity Assn. of James Madison Memorial High School, et al. By: Adam R. Prinsen, Quarles & Brady, Madison, WI 5 Minutes Luke N. Berg Rebuttal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party must have back-up counsel available to argue in the event that the designated attorney(s) cannot appear and present oral argument for any reason on the scheduled oral argument date; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if any special access, visual or hearing arrangements are necessary for your attendance in court, please advise the Clerk of the Supreme Court no later than Wednesday, May 18, 2022; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon arrival for oral argument, each attorney presenting argument shall check in with the Clerk's office staff outside the Supreme Court Hearing Room. Comment: Letter from Attorney Prinsen 04-11-2022 Order |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
04-08-2022
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Letter from Attorney Prinsen
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-31-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Brief of Amicus Curiae Professors of Psychology & Human Development in Support of Defendant-Respondent & Intervenors-Defendant-Respondent; The front cover states "Exhibit A" and therefore the eFiled copy is not identical to the physical copy. Please eFile an identical copy of the Brief.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-30-2022
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae
Brief of Amicus Curiae (Professors of Psychology & Human Development) |
|
|
Filed By: Victoria Davis Davila
Comment: Professors of Psychology and Human Development (PPHD) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-30-2022
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae
Brief of Amicus Curiae (Madison Teachers Inc. (MTI)) |
|
|
Filed By: Tamara Packard
Comment: Madison Teachers Inc. (MTI) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-30-2022
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae
Brief Of Amicus Curiae (AACAP, WCCAP) |
|
|
Filed By: Eric Pearson
Comment: American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) and Wisconsin Council of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (WCCAP) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-30-2022
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae
Brief of Amicus Curiae (Liberty Justice Center) |
|
|
Comment: Liberty Justice Center (LCJ)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-30-2022
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Cover Letter to Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-30-2022
|
Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
|
|
|
Filed By: Victoria Davis Davila
Submit Date: 3-30-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 3-30-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the motions for leave to file non-party briefs amici curiae are granted, and the briefs filed with the motions are accepted as filed; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to admit Attorneys Shannon Minter and Asaf Orr, pro hac vice, is granted. A copy of Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party's copy of this order. Comment: Attorneys Shannon Minter and Asaf Orr |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-30-2022
|
Reply Brief-Supreme Court
Reply Brief - Supreme Court |
|
|
Filed By: Luke Berg
Comment: Separate appendix |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-28-2022
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Motion for Leave to File Non-Party Brief; This document is rejected because the Supreme Court does not currently accept this type of document via eFiling. If you have not done so already, please submit this document via US Mail, with the correct number of copies, to be filed with this Court.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-25-2022
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Victoria Davis Davila
Submit Date: 3-25-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 3-30-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the motions for leave to file non-party briefs amici curiae are granted, and the briefs filed with the motions are accepted as filed; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to admit Attorneys Shannon Minter and Asaf Orr, pro hac vice, is granted. A copy of Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party's copy of this order. Comment: Professors of Psychology and Human Development (PPHD) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-25-2022
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Eric Pearson
Submit Date: 3-25-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 3-30-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the motions for leave to file non-party briefs amici curiae are granted, and the briefs filed with the motions are accepted as filed; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to admit Attorneys Shannon Minter and Asaf Orr, pro hac vice, is granted. A copy of Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party's copy of this order. Comment: Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief - American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) and the Wisconsin Council of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (WCCAP) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-25-2022
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Cover letter to MAM - Madison Teachers Inc. (MTI)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-25-2022
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Tamara Packard
Submit Date: 3-25-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 3-30-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the motions for leave to file non-party briefs amici curiae are granted, and the briefs filed with the motions are accepted as filed; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to admit Attorneys Shannon Minter and Asaf Orr, pro hac vice, is granted. A copy of Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party's copy of this order. Comment: Madison Teachers Inc. (MTI) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-25-2022
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Daniel Suhr
Submit Date: 3-25-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 3-30-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the motions for leave to file non-party briefs amici curiae are granted, and the briefs filed with the motions are accepted as filed; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to admit Attorneys Shannon Minter and Asaf Orr, pro hac vice, is granted. A copy of Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party's copy of this order. Comment: Liberty Justice Center (LJC) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-25-2022
|
Brief of Amicus Curiae
Brief of Amicus Curiae (Wisconsin Family Action (WFA), et al.) |
|
|
Filed By: Matthew Fernholz
Comment: Wisconsin Family Action (WFA), et al. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-24-2022
|
Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief
|
|
|
Filed By: Matthew Fernholz
Submit Date: 3-24-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 3-25-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a non-party brief amicus curiae is granted, and the brief filed with the motion is accepted as filed; and, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to admit Frederick W. Claybrook, Jr., pro hac vice, is granted. A copy of Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party's order. Comment: Wisconsin Family Action (WFA), Illinois Family Institute (IFI), Minnesota Family Council (MFC), Delaware Family Policy Council (DFPC), Nebraska Family Alliance (NFA), Hawaii Family Forum (HFF), The Family Foundation (TFF), Minnesota-Wisconsin Baptist Convention (MWBC), Ethics and Religious Liberty commission of the Southern Baptist Convention (ERLCSBC), Concerned Women for America (CWA), Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC), National Legal Foundation (NLF), Pacific Justice Institute (PJI) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-24-2022
|
Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
|
|
|
Filed By: Matthew Fernholz
Submit Date: 3-24-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 3-25-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a non-party brief amicus curiae is granted, and the brief filed with the motion is accepted as filed; and, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to admit Frederick W. Claybrook, Jr., pro hac vice, is granted. A copy of Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party's order. Comment: Frederick W. Claybrook, Jr. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-21-2022
|
Motion for Pro Hac Vice status
|
|
|
Filed By: Christine Donahoe
Submit Date: 3-22-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 3-22-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the motion to admit Jon W. Davidson, pro hac vice, is granted. A copy of Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 10.03(4), setting forth the requirements for attorneys appearing pro hac vice, is attached to the moving party's order. Comment: Jon W. Davidson 03-22-2022 Order |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-21-2022
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Notice of Substitution of Counsel - Attorney Christine Donahoe replaced Attorney John Knight
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
03-16-2022
|
Response Brief-Supreme Court
Joint Response Brief - Supreme Court |
|
|
Comment: Separate appendix.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
02-23-2022
|
Assigned-Oral Argument
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
02-14-2022
|
First Brief-Supreme Court
First Brief - Supreme Court |
|
|
Filed By: Luke Berg
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
02-10-2022
|
Motion for Clarification
|
|
|
Filed By: Luke Berg
Submit Date: 2-11-2022 Decision: (N) No Action Decision Date: 7-8-2022 No action. Comment: Motion for Clarification as to Signature Requirements; made moot by S.Ct. Rule Order Nos. 19-02B and 20-07B (07/07/22). |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
02-10-2022
|
Motion to Extend Time
|
|
|
Filed By: Luke Berg
Submit Date: 2-11-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 2-7-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the Petitioners' motion for an extension of time is granted. Petitioners' opening brief, which was received by the clerk of this court on February 14, 2022, is accepted for filing as of that date; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Respondents' motion for an extension of time is granted. Respondents' response brief shall be served and filed on or before March 16, 2022; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for filing motions for leave to file a non-party brief amicus curiae set forth in the courts January 13, 2022 order is amended as follows. Any non-party that wishes to file a non-party brief amicus curiae must file a motion for leave of the court to file a non-party brief by March 25, 2022. Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.19 (7). A proposed non-party brief must accompany the motion for leave to file it. See BR1 event due on 2-2-2022 Comment: 02-17-2022 Order |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
02-10-2022
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Emily Feinstein
Submit Date: 2-11-2022 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 2-17-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the Petitioners' motion for an extension of time is granted. Petitioners' opening brief, which was received by the clerk of this court on February 14, 2022, is accepted for filing as of that date; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Respondents' motion for an extension of time is granted. Respondents' response brief shall be served and filed on or before March 16, 2022; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for filing motions for leave to file a non-party brief amicus curiae set forth in the courts January 13, 2022 order is amended as follows. Any non-party that wishes to file a non-party brief amicus curiae must file a motion for leave of the court to file a non-party brief by March 25, 2022. Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.19 (7). A proposed non-party brief must accompany the motion for leave to file it. Comment: Respondents' Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
02-09-2022
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Letter from Clerk to Attorney Berg
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
02-08-2022
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: Letter from Attorney Berg
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-13-2022
|
Court Changed to Supreme Court
|
|
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-13-2022
|
Court Order
|
|
|
(continued..)
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the first brief filed in this court must contain, as part of the appendix, a copy of the decision of the court of appeals in this case; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if a party has not previously filed an electronic copy of the briefs filed on behalf of that party in the court of appeals, the party, within 30 days after the date of this order, must provide the clerk of this court with 10 copies of the brief previously filed on behalf of that party in the court of appeals; but if the party has already filed an electronic copy of such briefs, then there is no obligation to provide additional copies of those briefs to the clerk of this court; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any non-party that wishes to file a non-party brief amicus curiae must file a motion for leave of the court to file a non-party brief by March 2, 2022. Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.19 (7). A proposed non-party brief must accompany the motion for leave to file it; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the allowance of costs, if any, in connection with the granting of the petition will abide the decision of this court on review. ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. (dissenting). I would deny the motion to file a reply. This court has seen an unfortunate recent trend of filing such motions.1 I say unfortunate because a reply to a response to a petition for review is outside of this court's established rules. See Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.62(2) and (3) (providing requirements for petition for review and response to petition only) |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-09-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Attorney Zylstra letter dated September 9, 2021 to Sheila Reiff, Clerk; This document is rejected because the Supreme Court does not currently accept this type of document via eFiling. If you have not done so already, please submit this document via US Mail, with the correct number of copies, to be filed with this Court.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-09-2021
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Motion to file Reply in Support of Petition for Review; This document is rejected because the Supreme Court does not currently accept this type of document via eFiling. We have received paper copies in the Clerk's office already, no action necessary.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
09-08-2021
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Luke Berg
Submit Date: 9-8-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-13-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the motion to file a reply is granted, and plaintiffs-appellants-petitioners' reply and appendix are accepted as filed; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for review is granted and that pursuant to Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.62(6), the plaintiffs-appellants-petitioners may not raise or argue issues not set forth in the petition for review unless otherwise ordered by the court; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Wis. Stat. (Rules) 809.62(6) and 809.63, within 20 days after the date of this order the plaintiffs-appellants-petitioners must file a brief in this court; that within 20 days of filing the defendant-respondent, Madison Metropolitan School District, and intervenors-defendants-respondents, Gender Equity Association of James Madison Memorial High School, Gender Sexuality Alliance of Madison West High School, and Gender Sexuality Alliance of Robert M. La Follette High School, must file either a brief or a statement that no brief will be filed; and that if a brief is filed by the defendant-respondent and intervenors-defendants-respondents, within 10 days of filing of the last response brief the plaintiffs-appellants-petitioners must file either a reply brief or a statement that no reply brief will be filed; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in any brief filed in this court the parties shall not incorporate by reference any portion of their court of appeals' brief or petition for review or response; instead, any material in these documents upon which there is reliance should be restated in the brief filed in this court; and (continued..) Motion Response Filed By: Sarah Zylstra Submit Date: 9-10-2021 Comment: Motion to file reply in support of petition for review; Response to Motion to file reply in support of petition for review |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-08-2021
|
Final Publication
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-25-2021
|
Cites
|
|
|
399 Wis. 2d 102
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-25-2021
|
Cites
|
|
|
963 N.W.2d 823
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-25-2021
|
Opinion Ordered Published
|
|
|
Comment: Opinion Ordered Published
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-25-2021
|
Public Domain Citation
|
|
|
Comment: PDC No: 2021 WI App 60
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-16-2021
|
Fee Paid
|
|
|
Comment: Receipt No: 21R 001875
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
08-13-2021
|
||
|
Filed By: Luke Berg
Submit Date: 8-30-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-13-2022 IT IS ORDERED that the motion to file a reply is granted, and plaintiffs-appellants-petitioners' reply and appendix are accepted as filed; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for review is granted and that pursuant to Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.62(6), the plaintiffs-appellants-petitioners may not raise or argue issues not set forth in the petition for review unless otherwise ordered by the court; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Wis. Stat. (Rules) 809.62(6) and 809.63, within 20 days after the date of this order the plaintiffs-appellants-petitioners must file a brief in this court; that within 20 days of filing the defendant-respondent, Madison Metropolitan School District, and intervenors-defendants-respondents, Gender Equity Association of James Madison Memorial High School, Gender Sexuality Alliance of Madison West High School, and Gender Sexuality Alliance of Robert M. La Follette High School, must file either a brief or a statement that no brief will be filed; and that if a brief is filed by the defendant-respondent and intervenors-defendants-respondents, within 10 days of filing of the last response brief the plaintiffs-appellants-petitioners must file either a reply brief or a statement that no reply brief will be filed; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in any brief filed in this court the parties shall not incorporate by reference any portion of their court of appeals' brief or petition for review or response; instead, any material in these documents upon which there is reliance should be restated in the brief filed in this court; and (continued..) Motion Response Filed By: Sarah Zylstra Submit Date: 8-30-2021 Motion Response Filed By: Luke Berg Submit Date: 9-8-2021 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-09-2021
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Sarah Horner for Madison Metropolitan School District
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-09-2021
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
Comment: Sarah Zylstra for Madison Metropolitan School District
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-06-2021
|
Sua Sponte
|
|
|
Filed By: Unassigned District 4
Submit Date: 8-6-2021 Decision: (N) No Action Decision Date: 8-10-2021 IT IS ORDERED that this court takes no action on the appellants letter requesting an amendment to the caption. Comment: Letter RE John and Jane Doe 5 Dismissal of Claims in Circuit Court |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-06-2021
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: RE Dismissal of John Doe 5 and Jane Doe 5
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-22-2021
|
||
|
Judge Panel: Kloppenburg, Blanchard, Nashold
Opinion: Opinion Decision: Affirmed Pages: 25 Written by: Kloppenburg, JoAnne F. Order Text: Order affirmed. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
01-07-2021
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Luke Berg
Submit Date: 1-8-2021 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 1-11-2021 IT IS ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the reply is accepted for filing. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-09-2020
|
Fee Paid
|
|
|
Comment: Receipt No: 20R 002451
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-09-2020
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Petition for Review Appendix: This appendix has been rejected because it must be electronically filed as one document. It is not necessary to electronically file the appendix, but if you wish to do so it must be one document.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
12-09-2020
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Petition for Review Appendix: This appendix has been rejected because it must be electronically filed as one document. It is not necessary to electronically file the appendix, but if you wish to do so it must be one document.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
SC
|
12-09-2020
|
Petition for Review
Petition for Review |
|
|
Filed By: Luke Berg
Submit Date: 12-23-2020 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 3-2-2021 IT IS ORDERED that the petition for review is denied, without costs. REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J., dissents. Motion Response Filed By: Emily Feinstein Submit Date: 12-23-2020 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-20-2020
|
Submitted on Briefs
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
11-04-2020
|
Briefs Received At State Law Library
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-30-2020
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Richard Esenberg
Submit Date: 11-9-2020 Decision: (N) No Action Decision Date: 11-12-2020 No Action |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-30-2020
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Luke Berg
Submit Date: 10-30-2020 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 11-9-2020 IT IS ORDERED that the motion for permission to file a reply is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for injunctive relief pending appeal is denied. |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-28-2020
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Defendants-Respondents' Response and Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal And/Or Temporary Injunction; This document is rejected because this Court does not currently accept this type of document for filing via e-filing, pursuant to Wis. Stat. 809.80. We have received the paper copy of this document already, no further action is necessary.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-26-2020
|
Record and Briefs Sent to District 4
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-23-2020
|
Reply Brief
Reply Brief |
|
|
Filed By: Luke Berg
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-14-2020
|
Court Order
|
|
|
IT IS ORDERED that the respondents shall file a response to the appellants motion no later than October 27, 2020. The respondents may file separate responses or a single joint response.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appellants reply brief remains due on its existing deadline. See MMS event filed on 10-13-2020 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-13-2020
|
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
|
|
|
Filed By: Luke Berg
Submit Date: 10-13-2020 Decision: (D) Deny Decision Date: 11-9-2020 IT IS ORDERED that the motion for permission to file a reply is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for injunctive relief pending appeal is denied. Motion Response Filed By: Barry Blonien Submit Date: 10-28-2020 This motion contains court order(s). |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-12-2020
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Joint Brief of Defendants-Respondents; Corrected brief filed, no action necessary.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-08-2020
|
Certificate of Filing by Mail
|
|
|
Comment: Respondent's brief 10 copies mailed 10-05-2020 (IB)
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
10-08-2020
|
Brief of Respondent(s)
Brief of Respondents (Joint) |
|
|
Filed By: Emily Feinstein
Comment: Separate appendix. Please note that the Trial Court Judge and County appealed from have been added to the cover of all briefs. Please include this information on all future briefs pursuant to Rule 809.19(9). |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-29-2020
|
Motion for Clarification
|
|
|
Filed By: Emily Feinstein
Submit Date: 9-29-2020 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 9-30-2020 IT IS ORDERED that the respondents brief shall be due on October 5, 2020. Comment: or Motion to Extend Time; [original received 10/5/2020] |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-14-2020
|
Non Final Dismissal
|
|
|
Pages: 1
Order Text: ORD that John and Jane Does 6 and 8 are dismissed pursuant to Rule 809.18. Comment: Non Final Dismissal |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-14-2020
|
Caption Amended
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-11-2020
|
Sua Sponte
|
|
|
Filed By: Unassigned District 4
Submit Date: 9-11-2020 Decision: (N) No Action Decision Date: 9-14-2020 No action Comment: Dismiss John and Jane Does 6 and 8? |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-11-2020
|
Letter/Correspondence
|
|
|
Comment: From Attorney Luke Berg; Stating John and Jane Doe 6 and 8 were dismissed in the circuit court
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
09-02-2020
|
Rejected Electronic Document
|
|
|
Comment: Brief of Appellants; this brief is rejected due to an incorrect caption and incorrect party designations. Please e-file a corrected version of your brief - with the caption being identical to that listed on the case. Physical copies have been corrected by the Clerks Office.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
08-31-2020
|
Brief & Appx of Appellant(s)
Brief of Appellant |
|
|
Comment: Note that the caption has been corrected on this brief. Please use the above caption on all future briefs.
Note the party designation on the caption was corrected on the covers of all briefs. Please use the above caption on all future briefs.
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-22-2020
|
Sealed Documents
|
|
|
Comment: #60
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-22-2020
|
Record
|
|
|
Comment: 1-21 to 96-1, ELECTRONICALLY FILED
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-20-2020
|
Caption Amended
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
07-10-2020
|
Other Papers
|
|
|
Comment: CRS; Meredith Seymour; Transcripts filed with CC 7/3/20; CRS
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-26-2020
|
Statement on Transcript
|
|
|
Filed By: Luke Berg
Status: Prev. Filed |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-22-2020
|
Notif. Sent-Filing of NAP & Ct. Record
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-22-2020
|
Fee Paid
|
|
|
Comment: Receipt No: 20R 001207
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-22-2020
|
Notice of Appeal & Court Record
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-17-2020
|
Fee Paid
|
|
|
Comment: Receipt No: 20R 001179
|
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-17-2020
|
Petition for Leave to Appeal
|
|
|
Filed By: Luke Berg
Submit Date: 7-8-2020 Decision: (G) Grant Decision Date: 7-20-2020 IT IS ORDERED that we accept jurisdiction over this appeal, either under WIS. STAT. 808.03 or WIS. STAT. RULE 809.50. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall include argument in their briefs addressing whether the order appealed is a final appealable order. Motion Response Filed By: Emily Feinstein Submit Date: 7-8-2020 Motion Response Filed By: Barry Blonien Submit Date: 7-10-2020 |
||||
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-15-2020
|
Docketing Statement from Appellant
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-12-2020
|
Notice of Appeal filed in Cir. Ct.
|
|
|
OCCD
|
CA
|
06-03-2020
|
Non-Final Order of Circuit Court
|
|